Rubus neovicarius M. Idrees, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7011148 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF287E-FFDA-FFCE-A9D5-8ED6FF2EFAE9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus neovicarius M. Idrees |
status |
nom. nov. |
13. Rubus neovicarius M. Idrees View in CoL , nom. nov.
Replaced name: Rubus vicarius Focke ex Sargent (1911: 56 ; ad int. 31 July) nom. illeg., non Sudre (1902:12)
≡ Rubus idaeus f. vicarius Focke (1911b: 211 View in CoL ; ad int. June)
Type (holotype):— CHINA. Western Szechuan [Sichuan]: Washan , thickets, alt. 1500-2100 m, July & Sept. 1908, E.H. Wilson 948 (barcode A00133761!, isotypes: BM000622283!, NY00429721!, US01107715!) . [Image available at https://kiki.huh.harvard.edu/databases/specimen_search.php?mode=details&id=136712].
Etymology: —The specific epithet derives from the prefix neo -, meaning new, and multisetosus , the epithet used by Focke (1911).
Note:—According to Art. 53.1 of the ICN, Rubus vicarius Focke ex Sargent (1911: 56) is an illegitimate later homonym of R. vicarius Sudre (1902: 12) . A new replacement name, Rubus neovicarius M. Idrees , is therefore proposed here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rubus neovicarius M. Idrees
Idrees, Muhammad & Zhang, Zhiyong 2022 |
Rubus idaeus f. vicarius
Focke, W. O. 1911: 211 |