Rubus megalothyrsus Cardot (1917: 293)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7009302 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF287E-FFDD-FFC9-A9D5-8BE6FE01F835 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus megalothyrsus Cardot (1917: 293) |
status |
|
11. Rubus megalothyrsus Cardot (1917: 293) View in CoL
Type (lectotype designated here):— CHINA. Kwangtung (Guangdong), Aug. 1887, C. Ford 73 (barcode K000737645!). [Image available at http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000737645] .
Note:— In the protologue, Cardot (1917) provided two collections: “ China: Kwangtung [Guangdong] (Ford 73)”, and “ Province de Kiangsi [Jiangxi], haies autour de Kin-Kiang, 1868 (David 781)” but did not indicate the holotype specimen. We locate one specimen of “ Ford 73 ”, deposited in K (barcode 000737645), and 4 duplicate specimens of “ David s.n. ” kept in P (barcode 00746137, 00746138, 00746139, 00746140) but without collection number, so it cannot be select as the lectotype. We designate the sheet “ Ford 73 ” in K (barcode 000737645) as the lectotype (Art. 9.12 of ICN), since it is morphological complete with the presence of stem, leaves, flower, and inflorescence that fully correspond with the protologue .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |