Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5304733 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D751AC5C-5C26-4A5D-8A6C-0FF088E518ED |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EFFF5C-FFC2-FF94-FEBA-53D5FD12FC2A |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893 |
status |
|
Genus Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893
ACHTERBERG & KATS (2000) considered Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893 , and Embolemus Westwood, 1833 (Embolemidae) , synonyms. We agree that it is sometimes difficult to assign a male to Ampulicomorpha or Embolemus , because the length and the pigmentation of the veins enclosing the 1SDC cell (and mainly the posterior vein, near 1A vein) are sometimes variable (1SDC closed or open is the only character used for separating the males of the two above genera). However, females are not a problem, because they are brachypterous or micropterous in Embolemus and macropterous in Ampulicomorpha . For the present, we prefer to continue to consider both genera valid, because in most cases they are easily separated and a recent paper by OLMI et al. (2014), based on biology and fossils of Embolemidae , seems to confirm the separation of the two above genera. We agree with ACHTERBERG & KATS (2000) that ‘certainty about this problem will be gained after a thorough analysis of both sexes of the species involved, preferably including DNA analysisʼ.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |