Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893

Olmi, Massimo, Copeland, Robert S., Guglielmino, Adalgisa & Icipe, 2015, An updated checklist of Dryinidae, Embolemidae and Sclerogibbidae (Hymenoptera) of Kenya and Burundi, with descriptions of thirteen new species, Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 55 (1), pp. 333-380 : 366

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5304733

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D751AC5C-5C26-4A5D-8A6C-0FF088E518ED

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EFFF5C-FFC2-FF94-FEBA-53D5FD12FC2A

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893
status

 

Genus Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893

ACHTERBERG & KATS (2000) considered Ampulicomorpha Ashmead, 1893 , and Embolemus Westwood, 1833 (Embolemidae) , synonyms. We agree that it is sometimes difficult to assign a male to Ampulicomorpha or Embolemus , because the length and the pigmentation of the veins enclosing the 1SDC cell (and mainly the posterior vein, near 1A vein) are sometimes variable (1SDC closed or open is the only character used for separating the males of the two above genera). However, females are not a problem, because they are brachypterous or micropterous in Embolemus and macropterous in Ampulicomorpha . For the present, we prefer to continue to consider both genera valid, because in most cases they are easily separated and a recent paper by OLMI et al. (2014), based on biology and fossils of Embolemidae , seems to confirm the separation of the two above genera. We agree with ACHTERBERG & KATS (2000) that ‘certainty about this problem will be gained after a thorough analysis of both sexes of the species involved, preferably including DNA analysisʼ.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Embolemidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF