Protosmylinae Krüger, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4980.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4D00067-F4F3-4BC5-9CDA-6532773B56B0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5915222 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F07D0C-0439-FFF7-F095-7E5AFB9404D2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Protosmylinae Krüger, 1913 |
status |
|
Subfamily Protosmylinae Krüger, 1913
Type genus. Protosmylus Krüger, 1913 View in CoL (= Osmylidia Cockerell, 1908 View in CoL ).
Emended diagnosis (based on wings). Wings may be distinguished from those of other subfamilies of Osmylidae View in CoL by a combination of the following.
Forewing: Subcostal veinlets almost always simple (very rarely some forked) [ Osmylinae : mostly forked]; trichosors along almost entire wing margin [ Gumillinae : restricted to apical region]; one subcostal crossvein, positioned basally [Porisminae: numerous along entire subcostal space]; all or nearly all crossveins in radial space forming three to four gradate series (except some Lysmus View in CoL ) [all or nearly all crossveins ( Gumillinae , Porisminae, Eidoporisminae ) or proximal crossveins (other subfamilies) irregularly arranged]; M forked at level or only slightly proximad termination of A1 [ Osmylinae , Kempyninae : much distad; Stenosmylinae , Porisminae, Eidoporisminae : much proximad]; between CuA, CuP ≤ 5 crossveins (up to 8 in some Lysmus View in CoL ) [ Spilosmylinae : about 10 or more]; CuA pectinate, with 2–6 branches; CuP with 3–7 pectinate branches (up to 9 in some Lysmus View in CoL ) [ Spilosmylinae : 8–15].
Hind wing: MP lacks anteriorly directed basal spur-like process [ Spilosmylinae : present]; CuP relatively short, shallowly (not pectinately) branched or simple [ Kempyninae , Osmylinae , Stenosmylinae , Porisminae, Eidoporisminae : long, pectinately branched].
Genera included. Ten genera: † Sogjuta Martynova, 1958 View in CoL (Early to Late Jurassic, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia), sit. nov.; † Juraheterosmylus Wang et al., 2010 View in CoL (late Middle / early Late Jurassic, China); † Jurosmylus Makarkin & Archibald, 2005 View in CoL (Late Jurassic, Kazakhstan); † Protosmylina Jepson et al. 2009 View in CoL (Early Cretaceous, England); † Osmylidia View in CoL (= Protosmylus, Priabonian, Baltic View in CoL amber, syn. nov.), and † Pseudosmylidia Makarkin, 2017 View in CoL (Priabonian, North America and Europe); Heterosmylus Krüger, 1913 View in CoL , Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 View in CoL , and Lysmus Navás, 1911 View in CoL (extant, all southeastern Asia); Paryphosmylus Krüger, 1913 View in CoL (extant, Ecuador).
Remarks. The venation of some species of Lysmus is very similar to that of the Spilosmylinae , e.g., L. harmandinus Navás, 1910 (see Makarkin 1985: Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ; Winterton et al. 2019: Fig. 34). Moreover, this genus had long been considered a member of the Spilosmylinae . Lysmus , however, lacks an important synapomorphy of Spilosmylinae , the presence of an anteriorly directed basal spur-like process in the hind wing MP. Also, the male genitalia of Lysmus are typical for Protosmylinae (see Wang 2010).
According to Article 40.1 of ICZN, a family-group name is not replaced with a new family-group name when the name of its type genus is considered to be a junior synonym of another genus. Hence, Protosmylinae retains this name following designation of Protosmylus as a junior synonym of Osmylidia .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.