Daphnella inangulata, Li & Li, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2013.861939 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4337248 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F087E8-FFBA-FFC2-579B-414FAA37FEDD |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Daphnella inangulata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Daphnella inangulata View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figure 1B View Figure 1 )
Type material
Holotype: SCS. 1 spec, 20°15 ′ N, 109°30 ′ E, sandy mud, 31 m, 28 January 1959, Registry number MBM-Li, deposited in MBMCAS. GoogleMaps
Description
Shell large, fusiform, with tall spire, spire with height about as long as combined height of aperture and siphonal canal. Body whorl obviously enlarged, suture narrow, distinct. Spiral whorls eight, including five teleoconch whorls, cancellated by sinuous fine axial and spiral ribs; and three protoconch whorls, worn to a certain extent, especially the first two protoconch whorls, the last whorl with less cancellate sculpture. Overall sculpture of dense axial and spiral ridges, rendered cancellate and granulose by crossing of even denser axial ribs. With large, wide, sinuous aperture, base of columella slightly foreshortened; siphonal canal wide, fusiform, not indented. Outer lip thin, with weakly notched edge; anal sinus openly, very widely concave, presenting a converse L subsutural. Uniformly light yellowish brown.
Etymology
“in-”, Latin, non, lack. The specific name refers to the close similarity of the new species with Daphnella angulata .
Distribution
Only known from the type locality SCS, China .
Remarks
The species is very similar to Daphnella angulata Habe and Masuda, 1990 , but differs from the latter by the shell shape. In Higo et al. (2001): fig. G. 3856), the figures of the holotype of D. angulata show that the angle on the spire is above the middle on spire whorls, instead of the base as in our specimen; the spire whorls of the present type specimen are not shouldered as those in the holotype of D. angulata ; the spiral ridges of the present specimen are coarser than those of the holotype of D. angulata . Additionally, our specimen is more biconical in shape than the holotype of D. angulata .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |