Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819
Raines, Bret & Huber, Markus, 2012, 3217, Zootaxa 3217, pp. 1-106 : 66
publication ID |
11755334 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5250701 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187DA-6F16-FFCD-A394-881BFE4AFA54 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819 |
status |
|
Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819 View in CoL
Figures 34 A–F
Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819: p. 96 View in CoL .
Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819 View in CoL — Huber, 2010: p. 282, figs. 10–12.
Chama imbricata Broderip, 1835, p. 304 View in CoL , pl. 39, fig. 2, non Lamarck, 1801
Chama imbricata Broderip, 1835 View in CoL — Oliver, 1992: p. 105, pl. 26.
Chama savignyi Jousseaume View in CoL in Lamy, 1921: p. 238 — Huber, 2010: p. 676.
Chama plinthota Cox, 1927: p. 98 View in CoL . (nom. nov.)
Chama plinthota Cox, 1927 View in CoL — Lamprell & Whitehead, 1992: pl. 24, fig. 152; Brook & Marshall, 1998: p. 213; Spencer et al., 2011: p. 1.
Chama ratoi Boshoff, 1965 p. 151 View in CoL , pl. 4, fig. 2— Kilburn, 1973: p. 708.
Chama View in CoL — Luke, 1995: p. 107. (Lot M 1452 in part)
Material examined. Several single valves (up to 47 mm in length) (BK), including valves collected by the 1957/58 Downwind Expedition ( SIO Benthic Collection, M1452), plus specimens from the Marquesas Islands ( MHU).
Diagnosis. Shell medium to large, occasionally subcircular but usually oblong. The LV is the lower attached valve. Specimens are usually dextral with the umbo pointing anteriorward, but occasionally sinistral with the umbo pointing posteriorward. Exterior surface of commarginal lamellose, and typically covered by incrustations. Typical dorsal ridge. Hinge strongly curved with broad folds and deep teeth. Color extremely variable from yellowish brown to greyish purple. In fresh specimens with the typical vertical or radial dark brown to orange marks below the dorsal ridge, continuing on the lower valve. Margins smooth.
Remarks. Some of the worn Chama material identified by Luke (1995) from the SIO Benthic Collection, M1452 ( Figs. 34 C–F) approaches the shape and ridge, but a firm identification is obviously impossible.
Chama croceata is often erroneously referred to as the preoccupied C. imbricata Broderip, 1835 , or its nom. nov. C. plinthota Cox, 1927 , as well as C. ratoi Boshoff, 1965 , described from Mozambique, and C. savignyi Jousseaume in Lamy, 1921, described from the Red Sea. However, all have proved to be consistent with the type material of C. croceata . Huber (2010: 676) clarified C. croceata type locality as the Red Sea.
The 47.3 mm specimen represents the largest bivalve ever found on Easter Island. Elsewhere, C. croceata grows to 100 mm.
Habitat. Occasionally found at several locations around EI, in sand and rubble, from 30–80 m.
Distribution. Chama croceata is known from the Red Sea to the Kermadec Islands, including the Marquesas Islands, Australia, and Norfolk Island, but is not known from the Hawaiian Islands. Easter Island is now considered a range extension— E5.
SIO |
Scripps Institution of Oceanography |
MHU |
Makerere University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chama croceata Lamarck, 1819
Raines, Bret & Huber, Markus 2012 |
Chama croceata
Huber, M. 2010: 282 |
Chama plinthota
Spencer, H. G. & Willan, R. C. & Marshall, B. & Murray, T. J. 2011: 1 |
Brook, F. J. & Marshall, B. A. 1998: 213 |
Chama
Luke, S. R. 1995: 107 |
Chama imbricata
Oliver, P. G. 1992: 105 |
Chama ratoi
Kilburn, R. N. 1973: 708 |
Chama plinthota
Cox, L. R. 1927: 98 |
Chama savignyi
Huber, M. 2010: 676 |
Lamy, E. 1921: 238 |
Chama imbricata
Broderip, W. J. 1835: 304 |
Chama croceata
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de 1819: 96 |