Koreacyclopina wellsi, Karanovic, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.14 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6B276081-8960-4AED-B0AE-B907F9109D54 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5572505 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187DA-FFFF-8E25-689C-FD05FAF9FE22 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Koreacyclopina wellsi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Koreacyclopina wellsi sp. nov.
Type locality. Korea, East Coast , Uljin, beach, intertidal sand, 36°18.309’N 129°22.648’E GoogleMaps .
Specimens examined. Holotype female dissected on one slide, allotype male dissected on one slide, four paratypes (three females and one male) dissected on one slide each, two paratypes (one female and one male) in alcohol, and two paratype females on one SEM stub (together with other specimens of Koreacyclopina wellsi and with specimens of Heterocyclopina koreaensis ; row no. 1), all collected from the type locality, 6 May 2016, leg. T. Karanovic.
Two paratypes (one female and one male) dissected on one slide each, five female paratypes on one SEM stub (together with other specimens of Koreacyclopina wellsi and with specimens of Heterocyclopina koreaensis ; row no. 3), and 15 paratypes (nine females, three males, and three copepodids) in alcohol, all collected from Korea, West Coast, Wido Island, beach, intertidal sand, 35°35.089’N 126°15.196’E, 12 April 2013, leg. T. Karanovic GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species is named in honour of the late Prof. John Wells, in recognition of his contributions to the taxonomy of cyclopinid copepods ( Wells 1965, 1967), which perhaps remained in the shadow of his colossal contributions to the taxonomy and systematics of harpacticoid copepods ( Wells 2007).
Description. Female (based on holotype and 12 paratypes). Body length, from 525 to 540 μm. Colour of preserved specimens yellowish and nauplius eye not visible. Integument on all somites smooth ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 , 9 View FIGURE 9 ), with very little bacterial cover, minute spinules only on anal somite and caudal rami, cuticular pores on all somites, and sensilla on all but penultimate somite; hyaline fringes of prosomites smooth, of ursomites serrated. Habitus ( Figs. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 9A View FIGURE 9 ) relatively slender in dorsal view, but with pronounced distinction between prosome and urosome (especially in lateral view), prosome ovoid, about 1.3 times as long as urosome, greatest width in dorsal view at posterior end of cephalothorax. Body about 3.3 times as long as wide in dorsal view and cephalothorax twice as wide as genital double-somite. First pedigerous somite not fused to cephalothorax, but completely covered with posterior extension of cephalothoracic shield (see Fig. 8C View FIGURE 8 ). Pedigerous somites without lateral expansions. Rostrum ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ) well-developed, membranous, very broad. Cephalothorax ( Figs. 8A, B, C View FIGURE 8 , 9A, B, C View FIGURE 9 ) 1.3 times as long as wide, about twice as long as free prosomites combined, representing around 38% of body length. Second to fourth prosomites ( Figs. 8D, E View FIGURE 8 , 9D, E View FIGURE 9 ) progressively shorter and narrower towards posterior end, and with fewer cuticular organs.
First urosomite ( Figs. 9F View FIGURE 9 ) shortest, laterally expanded in posterior part.
Genital double-somite ( Figs. 8F View FIGURE 8 , 9G View FIGURE 9 , 11A, B, C View FIGURE 11 ) about 1.15 times as long as wide in ventral view, widest anterior part 1.4 times as wide as posterior margin; anterior part (second urosomite) with one pair of narrowly spaced dorsal sensilla, dorsal median pore, and one pair of lateral pores next to sixth legs; posterior part (third urosomite) with one pair of narrowly spaced dorsal sensilla, one pair of lateral sensilla, and two pairs of widely spaced ventral pores. Median copulatory pore inside large depression, small, triangular, covered by large triangular flap formed by glued spermatophores. Copulatory duct short, narrow, rigidly sclerotized, directed anteriorly and extended anteriorly past seminal receptacles. Seminal receptacles very small, ovoid, spaced widely and forming cross-like structure with copulatory duct, slightly less rigidly sclerotized than copulatory duct, without internal folds. Oviducts not rigidly sclerotized and therefore not clearly visible. Genital aperture situated laterally, covered by reduced sixth legs. Fourth urosomite ( Figs. 9G View FIGURE 9 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) with sensilla and pores as in third urosomite, except ventralmost pair of pores more narrowly spaced. Fifth urosomite ( Fig. 8G View FIGURE 8 , 9H View FIGURE 9 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) with one pair of widely spaced ventral pores and one pair of lateral pores. Sixth urosomite ( Figs. 8H View FIGURE 8 , 9H View FIGURE 9 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) with one pair of large dorsal sensilla, one pair of lateral sensilla, one pair of dorsal pores, one pair of ventral pores, two diagonal rows of minute spinules in narrow and deep anal sinus; anal operculum very short, narrow, covered by posterior margin of fifth urosomite.
Caudal rami ( Figs. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 9A, H View FIGURE 9 , 10A View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) cylindrical, about six times as long as wide, narrowest in central part, narrowly spaced on anal somite, slightly diverging posteriorly, with pair of ventrolateral pores around midlength, minute spinules at base of lateral and outer apical setae, posterior ventral row of large spinules, and seven setae. Almost all setae broken in all examined specimens, so their size could only be estimated from width of remaining basal part; all except dorsal seta uniarticulated at base; dorsal seta inserted close to median posterior corner, biarticulated at base; anterior lateral seta minute, hardly larger than some sensilla, inserted at about two fifths of ramus length; posterior lateral inserted dorsolaterally at about three quarters of ramus length; principal apical setae with breaking planes.
Antennula ( Figs. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 9A View FIGURE 9 , 10D View FIGURE 10 , 11D, E View FIGURE 11 ) reaching two thirds of cephalothoracic shield with its distal tip, stout, cylindrical but tapering towards distal end, 13-segmented but second segment with signs of incomplete segmentation along posterior margin, with most setae smooth and slender and both aesthetascs short and slender, row of small spinules only on first segment; armature formula 3.12.3.5.1.1.1.1.1+ae.2.2.6+ae; one large seta on tenth and one on thirteenth segment with breaking planes, only two subapical setae on thirteenth segment biarticulated; second segment largest and longest, about 0.9 times as long as wide; tenth segment second longest, about 1.1 times as long as wide; thirteenth segment 1.7 times as long as wide, about as long as eleventh and twelfth segments combined.
Antenna ( Figs. 10F View FIGURE 10 , 11F View FIGURE 11 ) slender, cylindrical, five-segmented, composed of short coxa, long basis, and even longer three-segmented endopod; coxa half as long as wide, unarmed and unornamented; basis 2.6 times as long as wide, with longitudinal row of minute spinules along outer margin, several large spinules on inner margin, one inner and two outer (expodal) slender and smooth setae; first endopodal segment 0.7 times as long as basis, 2.2 times as long as wide, with spinules along outer convex margin, and with single inner seta; second endopodal segment slightly longer and more slender than first endopodal, with several longitudinal rows of small spinules along outer margin, and five setae on inner margin (one lateral and four subapical; one subapical seta spiniform, other slender); third endopodal segment slightly shorter than first endopodal, 3.2 times as long as wide, with tuft of spinules on outer distal corner, four strong prehensile apical setae, one slender apical seta, and two slender subapical setae.
Mandibula ( Figs. 10B, F View FIGURE 10 , 12A View FIGURE 12 ) as in previous species, except last exopodal segment with three setae, last endopodal segment longer, dorsalmost tooth on cutting edge shorter, most teeth on cutting edge multicuspidate, cutting edge with more spinules, and basis, endopod, and exopod with large spinules.
Maxillula ( Figs. 10B View FIGURE 10 , 12B, C View FIGURE 12 ) as in previous species, except with extra slender seta on endopod, and also distal part of endopod more elongated (and consequently lateral setae inserted more proximally).
Maxilla ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ) more tapering distally than in previous species but also 2.6 times as long as wide, unornamented, segmentation as in previous species, armature as in previous species, except proximal coxal endite with only two setae, third endopodal segment with only two setae, and distal basal seta (spine?) not fused to basis.
Maxilliped ( Figs. 10C View FIGURE 10 , 12E View FIGURE 12 ) as in previous species, except syncoxa with spinules along outer margin, third endopodal segment more elongated (2.3 times as long as wide and 0.8 times as long as second endopodal), and third endopodal segment with single prehensile seta (in total only four prehensile setae on endopod).
Swimming legs ( Figs. 10G, H View FIGURE 10 , 13A, B, C, D, E, F View FIGURE 13 ) segmentation, ornamentation, and most armature as in previous species, except second endopodal segment of fourth leg with two inner setae; third endopodal segment of fourth leg nearly 1.9 times as long as wide.
Fifth leg ( Figs. 8F View FIGURE 8 , 10E View FIGURE 10 , 13G View FIGURE 13 ) segmentation and most armature and ornamentation as in previous species, except each segment with anterior cuticular pores, and second segment with additional outer spine.
Sixth leg ( Fig. 9G View FIGURE 9 ) as in previous species, except slender seta much shorter.
Male (based on allotype). Urosome ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ) as in previous species slightly more slender than in female, and second and third urosomites fully articulated, but ornamentation as in female; genital somite slightly longer than in previous species.
Caudal rami ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ) significantly shorter than in female (about 4.3 times as long as wide), but armature and ornamentation without significant differences.
Antennula ( Fig. 14B View FIGURE 14 ) shape, segmentation, geniculation, ornamentation, and most armature as in previous species, except ultimate segment comparatively shorter, and armature formula 1.1.7.2.2.2+ae.3.1.3+ae.4+ae.1.2.2.1+a e.10+2ae.
Antenna, mandibula, maxillula, maxilla, and maxilliped as in female.
Swimming legs ( Fig. 14C, D, E, F View FIGURE 14 ) as in female, except third exopodal segment of second leg with distal spine fused with segment, short, and smooth.
Fifth leg ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ) segmentation and most armature as in female, except second segment with two extra inner setae and apical seta much longer.
Sixth leg ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ) as in previous species, but outer seta twice as long as central seta and inner spine.
Variability. One female from Wido with lateral pore on third pedigerous somite situated more anteriorly (almost in line with two central lateral sensilla). Flap formed by fused spermatophores remarkably uniform.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |