Uroptychus insignis ( Henderson, 1885 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4353.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DF92FEF0-F887-40DB-AC4F-2868707E6224 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4684534 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F287EC-4E45-FFBF-FF4B-8DCC133DE850 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Uroptychus insignis ( Henderson, 1885 ) |
status |
|
Uroptychus insignis ( Henderson, 1885) View in CoL
( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 )
Diptychus insignis Henderson, 1885: 419 (type locality: off Marion Island, Prince Edward Islands, 46°41'S, 38°10'E, 567 m). Uroptychus insignis View in CoL .— Henderson, 1888: 175, pl. 21, figs 1, 1a, 1c [not 1b].— Baba, 2005: 227 (key, synonymies).— Baba et al., 2008: 34 (synonymies).— Ahyong et al., 2015: 111, figs. 3, 4 (part).
Type material. BMNH 1902.10.2.9–14, ov. female lectotype (cl 17.1, pcl 10.6 mm), 6 male paralectotypes (pcl 4.5–10.7 mm), 7 female paralectotypes (pcl 3.1–11.0 mm), off Marion Island, Prince Edward Islands, southern Indian Ocean, 46°41'S, 38°10'E, 567 m, “Challenger” Stn. 145A.
Material examined. AM P97998, 1 female (cl 14.3, pcl 9.0 mm), Kerguelen Islands , 50°06'S, 64°48'E, 489 m, 22 September 2010, Poker II st. 180. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Carapace excluding rostrum wider than long; dorsum smooth, densely setose on chelipeds and carapace, with transverse row of small epigastric spines; lateral margins divergent, spinose; anterolateral spine overreaching outer orbital spine; anterior branchial spine separated from remaining branchial spines by wide unarmed margin (occasionally with 1 or 2 small spines). Rostrum sharply triangular, margins unarmed or with few minute denticles. Sternite 3 anterior margin with deep, V-shaped median emargination. Basal antennal article with small outer spine; ultimate and penultimate articles each with distal spine. Antennal scale extending almost to or slightly overreaching apex of ultimate peduncle article. Ocular peduncle 1.4–1.5 × as long as wide. Crista dentata uniformly and minutely dentate. P2–4 similar; merus with small spines on extensor margin; propodus flexor margin broadened distally and lined with movable spines; dactylus flexor margin lined with strong, obliquely directed, corneous teeth.
Remarks. The known distribution of Uroptychus insignis ( Henderson, 1885) now remains in the southwestern Indian Ocean (Prince Edward Island, Crozet, Kerguelen and Amsterdam islands, Fig. 1 View FIGURE1 ). Ahyong et al. (2015) note no significant morphological differences between specimens from these locations other than allometric differences in cheliped size and spination. Uroptychus insignis and U. macquariae n.sp. are clearly very closely allied. Despite subtle (but consistent) morphological differences between the Macquarie and the Kerguelen Islands forms, they clearly differ genetically with more than 7% sequence divergence, indicating prolonged isolation. Any future attempts to identify new material will likely need to take into account the locality of the collections, particularly if the specimens are small.
Both Uroptychus insignis View in CoL and U. macquariae View in CoL n. sp. most closely resemble U. zeidleri Ahyong & Poore, 2004 View in CoL , from Tasmania (520 m) and U. spinulosus Dong & Li, 2015 View in CoL from a cold seep SW of Taiwan (1121 m). Uroptychus macquariae View in CoL n. sp. can be separated from U. zeidleri View in CoL by the branchial marginal carapace spination, arranged in a single, even, unbroken row in U. zeidleri View in CoL , while in U. insignis View in CoL and U. macquariae View in CoL n.sp., the anterior branchial spine is separated from the remainder by an unarmed interval, or at most with 1 or 2 small, well-spaced spines. Additionally, the dentition of the crista dentata differs (teeth evenly decreasing in size distally in U. zeidleri View in CoL ; teeth uniformly minute in U. insignis View in CoL and U. macquariae View in CoL n.sp.). The only known specimen of U. spinulosus View in CoL is smaller (pcl 3.7 mm) than both Uroptychus insignis View in CoL and U. macquariae View in CoL n.sp., which makes comparisons difficult. The holotype of U. spinulosus View in CoL has an unarmed second article of the antennal peduncle, while it is armed with a lateral spine in both U. insignis View in CoL and U. macquariae View in CoL . The cheliped merus is armed with one single large spine along the mesial margin in U. spinulosus View in CoL , and the lateral hepatic carapace region is unarmed (while it bears 1–2 small spines even in small specimens of both U. insignis View in CoL and U. macquariae View in CoL ).
Distribution. Southwestern Indian Ocean off Prince Edward Island, Amsterdam Island, the Crozet and Kerguelen Islands; 315–1680 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Uroptychus insignis ( Henderson, 1885 )
Schnabel, Kareen E., Burghardt, Ingo & Ahyong, Shane T. 2017 |
Diptychus insignis
Ahyong 2015: 111 |
Baba 2008: 34 |
Baba 2005: 227 |
Henderson 1888: 175 |
Henderson 1885: 419 |