Actinoseris d’Orbigny, 1849
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2013n1a2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4815117 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F487D7-FFEC-FFB4-FD3B-82B7FC2174BB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Actinoseris d’Orbigny, 1849 |
status |
|
Genus Actinoseris d’Orbigny, 1849 View in CoL
TYPE SPECIES. — Actinoseris cenomaniensis d’Orbigny, 1849 , by monotypy. The type species is valid as combined description of genus and species.
RANGE. — Hauterivian to Cenomanian.
DIAGNOSIS. — Solitary patellate corallum. Calicular outline circular. Septa compact. Microstructure of septa unknown. Septa in cross section externally slightly thicker, and slightly thinner towards the centre of the calice.Septal maximum thickness 250 µm. Symmetry of septa radial and regularly hexameral. Cycles of septa regular. Septal cycles differ in length, almost not in thickness. First three septal cycles extended to the centre of the calice, later cycles are shorter. Septa of younger cycles often and regularly connected to septa of preceeding ones. Septal upper border smooth (probably due to preservation), lateral face with numerous fine thorns, inner margin unknown. Pali or paliform lobes absent. Costae present. Costae ornamented with fine granules on their surface. Synapticulae present, irregularly distributed. Columella composed of a group of isolated granules. Endotheca unknown. Wall present, compact, structure unknown.
REMARKS
For the type species, only the complete type specimen and thin sections of topotypical specimens were available. The structure of the synapticulae and the endotheca could not be observed because no longitudinal thin sections could be prepared and because the type specimen is eroded and barely shows ornamentation. Species other than the type species show a regular dentation of the septal upper margin and vertical lines of granulae on the septal lateral face corresponding to the dentations. The existence of fulturae is possible, but could not be proven with the available material; they are reported by Alloiteau (1957: 339). The endotheca is absent in species other than the type species, although Alloiteau (1957:339) claimed it existed. Alloiteau obviously had more material on hand, but it could not be found at the MNHN. The type locality has been inaccessible for a long time and does not allow re-collection.
Actinoseris cannot be assigned to the Funginellidae View in CoL as formerly proposed. Funginella d’Orbigny, 1849 View in CoL was long considered congeneric with the genera of the Asteroseriidae View in CoL assuming that F. neocomiensis d’Orbigny, 1850 is the type species (for instance Beauvais 1982: II, 117). Hence, the type species is Cyclolites haueri Michelin, 1847 View in CoL , as designated by Wells (1936). The genus cannot be assigned to the Siderastraeidae because of the comparably lower density of ornamentation of the lateral faces of septa and lower number of synapticulae.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Actinoseris d’Orbigny, 1849
Löser, Hannes 2013 |
Funginellidae
Alloiteau 1952 |
Asteroseriidae
Alloiteau 1952 |
Siderastraeidae
Vaughan & Wells 1943 |
F. neocomiensis d’Orbigny, 1850
d'Orbigny 1850 |
Actinoseris
d'Orbigny 1849 |
Funginella d’Orbigny, 1849
d'Orbigny 1849 |
Cyclolites haueri
Michelin 1847 |