Encrasicholina gloria, Hata & Motomura, 2016

Hata, Harutaka & Motomura, Hiroyuki, 2016, Two new species of the genus Encrasicholina (Clupeiformes: Engraulidae): E. intermedia from the western Indian Ocean and E. gloria from the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and Mediterranean, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 64, pp. 79-88 : 80-86

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4504409

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D6D1C4DE-58A2-4885-A199-D3CB0E3774A8

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/49DEA731-B4EC-4857-AE66-534B07601D3A

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:49DEA731-B4EC-4857-AE66-534B07601D3A

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Encrasicholina gloria
status

sp. nov.

Encrasicholina gloria View in CoL , new species

[New English name: Red Sea anchovy] ( Figs. 2–5 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig ; Tables 1, 2)

Material examined. Holotype: MNHN 1966-0646 About MNHN , 53.3 mm SL, Suez Bay , Egypt, 29°54’00”N, 32°31’12”E, 16 January 1929, R. P. Dollfus GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 13 specimens, 48.9–72.0 mm SL. BMNH 1984.5.16.9–15, 5 specimens, 56.4–62.2 mm SL, Khasab, Oman, P. Cornelius; HUJ 20531, 67.9 mm SL, Jaffa , Israel; HUJ 20269, 3, 64.2–72.0 mm SL, KAUM–I . 80906, 65.1 mm SL, off coast between Tel Aviv and Ashdod , Israel; MNHN 1942-0049 About MNHN , 3 About MNHN , 48.9–57.2 mm SL, off Saudi Arabia, 1929, R . P. Dollfus.

Diagnosis. A species of Encrasicholina with the following combination of characters: dorsal and anal fins with two unbranched rays; pseudobranchial filaments 21–25; gill rakers 22–26 (modally 22, 24) in upper series on 1st gill arch, 29–33 (30, 31) in lower series, 51–59 (54) in total; gill rakers 15–16 (16) in upper series on 2nd gill arch, 26–29 (26) in lower series, 42–45 (42) in total; gill rakers 12–14 (12) in upper series on 3rd gill arch, 14–15 (14) in lower series, 26–29 (26) in total; gill rakers 9–11 (11) in upper series on 4th gill arch, 10–12 (11) in lower, 19–23 (22) in total; prepelvic scutes 3–6 (4); posterior tip of upper jaw not reaching to anterior margin of preopercle; length of first unbranched dorsal-fin ray 6.8–7.9% of SL.

Description. Data for the holotype are presented first, followed by paratype data in parentheses. Body cylindrical, elongate; greatest body depth at dorsal-fin origin. Dorsal profile of head and body slightly convex from snout tip to dorsal-fin origin, straight along dorsal-fin base. Ventral profile of head and body slightly convex from lower-jaw tip to pelvicfin insertion, slightly convex to straight from pelvic-fin origin to anal-fin origin, almost straight along anal-fin base. Dorsal and ventral profiles of caudal peduncle slightly concave. Belly slightly rounded, covered by 5 (3–6) sharp needle-like scutes anterior to insertion of pelvic fins. Postpelvic and predorsal scutes absent. Anus situated just anterior to anal-fin origin. Caudal peduncle compressed, its depth greater than eye diameter. Head rather large, compressed. Snout length less than eye diameter, tip rounded. Interorbital width less than orbit diameter. Mouth large, inferior, ventral to body axis, extending backward beyond posterior margin of eye. Lower jaw slender, longer than upper jaw, 115.5% (105.4–115.5%) of upper-jaw length, 65.3% (61.1–72.1%) of head length. Posterior tip of maxilla blunt, scarcely projecting beyond second supra-maxilla, not reaching to anterior border of preopercle. Single rows of conical teeth on jaws and palatines. Small conical teeth on vomer. Eye large, round, covered with adipose eyelid, lateral on head, located dorsal to horizontal through pectoral-fin insertion, visible in dorsal and ventral views; pupil round. Orbit elliptical. Nostrils close to each other, positioned anterior to anterior margin of orbit and above horizontal through midline of body. Posterior margin of preopercle smooth. Subopercle with rounded posterior margin. Opercular membrane without serrations. Interorbital space flat. Pseudobranchial filaments present, length of longest filament less than eye diameter. Posterior frontal fontanelles on top of head near occiput open. Gill rakers long, slender, rough, visible from side of head when mouth open. Distance between pectoral-fin and pelvic-fin insertions slightly shorter (slightly longer in some paratypes) than distance between dorsal-fin origin and anal-fin origin. Isthmus muscle short, not reaching anteriorly to posterior border of gill membrane, preceded by exposed urohyal between gill membranes. Exposed urohyal with two small fleshy lobes laterally. Gill membrane not broadly joined over isthmus. Scales thin, cycloid, deciduous, except for prepelvic scutes. Scales absent on head. Lateral line absent. Scales absent on fins except for broad triangular sheath of scales on caudal fin. Pectoral-fin axillary scale shorter than pectoral fin (absent in most paratypes, probably lost when collected or during storage). Pelvic-fin axillary scale absent in holotype and some paratypes (when present smaller than pectoral-fin axillary scale). Dorsal-fin origin posterior to vertical through base of last pelvic-fin ray, positioned approximately at mid body. Dorsal-fin base short, its length 69.2% (70.9–88.4%) of analfin base length. Dorsal and anal fins with two anteriormost rays unbranched. First dorsal-fin ray and first anal-fin ray rather long. Two anteriormost dorsal-fin and anal-fin rays closely spaced. Anal-fin origin posterior to vertical through base of last dorsal-fin ray; posterior tip of depressed anal fin falling short of caudal-fin base. Uppermost pectoral-fin ray unbranched, inserted below midline of body. Posterior tip of pectoral fin falling short of pelvic-fin origin; pectoral-fin rays damaged in holotype (1st or 2nd rays longest in some paratypes). Pelvic fin shorter than pectoral fin, insertion anterior to vertical at dorsal-fin origin. Posterior tip of depressed pelvic fin not reaching to anus, reaching vertical through base of 6th (6th–8th) dorsal-fin ray.

Colour of preserved specimens. Head and body almost uniformly pale brown, with a dull silver-gray, longitudinal band, its width slightly broader than pupil diameter, from just posterior to upper opercular margin to caudal-fin base. Few black melanophores scattered on occipital, upper part of opercle, and silver longitudinal band.

Distribution. Currently known only from the Persian Gulf (Khasab, Oman), the Red Sea ( Egypt and Saudi Arabia) and the eastern Mediterranean ( State of Israel) ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). The distribution of specimens in the Mediterranean is considered to represent Lessepsian migration.

Etymology. The specific name gloria is derived from the Latin meaning “glory”, in reference to the brilliant silver stripe along the body.

Comparisons. Eight nominal species have been attributed to the genus Encrasicholina ( Whitehead et al., 1988; Hata & Motomura, 2015). Encrasicholina intermedia new species and E. gloria new species are easily distinguished from all congeners, except for E. punctifer Fowler, 1938 , and Stolephorus buccaneeri Strasburg, 1960 , by having a short upper jaw, its posterior tip not reaching to the anterior border of the preopercle (vs. posterior tip of upper jaw reaching or extending beyond the anterior border; Hardenberg, 1933, 1934; Wongratana, 1983; Whitehead et al., 1988; Wongratana et al., 1999; Hata et al., 2012; Hata & Motomura, 2015). The first dorsal-fin ray length also can be used for distinguishing the three species from E. devisi (0.4–1.7% SL) and E. macrocephala (0.6–1.3% SL; Hata & Motomura, 2015; this study).

Encrasicholina intermedia , E. gloria , and E. punctifer [with its junior synonym Stolephorus buccaneeri ( Wongratana, 1983; Whitehead et al., 1988; Wongratana et al., 1999; this study)] resemble each other in sharing two unbranched rays in the dorsal and anal fins, a short upper jaw with its posterior tip not reaching to the anterior border of the preopercle, and an exposed urohyal with two small fleshy lobes. They can be distinguished from each other by the numbers of gill rakers on the first to fourth gill arches ( Table 1; Fig. 3 View Fig ). Encrasicholina gloria is also distinguished from the other two species in having a longer 1st unbranched dorsal-fin ray [6.8–7.9% (mean 7.3%) SL vs. 3.8–6.8 % (5.4%) in E. punctifer and 4.7–5.8% (5.4%) in E. intermedia ; Table 2; Fig. 4 View Fig .].

Comparative material examined. Encrasicholina punctifer (137 specimens, 21.9–95.5 mm SL): ANSP 68308, holotype of E. punctifer , 29.9 mm SL, ANSP 68309, 12 paratypes of E. punctifer , 23.4–31.9 mm SL, Fare Bay, Huaheine Island, Society Islands, French Polynesia, 17 April 1937; ANSP 82384, 10 of 19, 24.3–27.7 mm SL, Bora Bora Island, Society Islands, French Polynesia, 21 April 1937; BMNH 1965.10.19.39–40, 2, 37.4–51.5 mm SL; ca. 32 km northwest of Iriomote Island, Japan, 11 June 1965; BMNH 1967.11.10.1, 40.3 mm SL, taken from mouth of Coryphaena hippurus captured off Haputo, Guam, 8 August 1967; BMNH 1967.11.13.905–906, 2, 39.2–41.8 mm SL, Singapore, 13 July 1963; BMNH 1970.5.27.1–3, 2 of 3, 40.3–51.7 mm SL, taken from stomach of tuna captured off Apia Harbour, Upolu Island, Samoa; BMNH 1971.8.26.7–8, 1 of 2, 30.1 mm SL, Suruga Bay, Japan, 1967; BMNH 1971.8.26.9–10, 2, 28.2– 19.9 mm SL, between Starbuck Island and Malden Island, Kiribati, 04°57’S, 155°07’W, 3 October 1969; BMNH 1972.9.7.32–33, 2, 53.2– 43.9 mm SL, Fuellerborn Harbour, New Britain Island, Papua New Guinea, 7 April 1972; BMNH 1976.4.27.18, 55.7 mm SL, Hong Kong; BMNH 1978.8.17.7–8, 2, 51.8–54.2 mm SL, Pomona, Queensland, Australia; BMNH 1988.8.1.74–86, 11, 51.1–61.8 mm SL, Hainan Island, China, 22 April 1988; KAUM–I. 6673, 52.7 mm SL, off Chiringa Island, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan, 31°16’38”N, 130°40’18”E, 25 m, 3 October 2007; KAUM–I. 7374, 53.5 mm SL, off Chiringa Island, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan, 31°16’38”N, 130°40’18”E, set net, 25 m, 28 November 2007; KAUM–I. 7398, 55.2 mm SL, off Tsushiro, Uchinoura Bay, Koyama, Kimotsuki, Kagoshima, Japan, 31°17’N, 130°41’E, set net, 40 m, 29 October 2007; KAUM–I. 10445, 95.5 mm SL, off Kaimon, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan, 31°10’20”N, 130°32’56”E, set net, 50 m, 25 June 2008; KAUM–I. 22921, 57.5 mm SL, mouth of Bang Pakong River, Chachoengsao, Thailand, 13°27’N, 100°57’E; KAUM–I. 41056, 54.1 mm SL, KAUM–I. 41057, 53.2 mm SL, KAUM–I. 41058, 53.1 mm SL, east of Sakinoyama, Kataura, Kasasa, Minami-satsuma, Kagoshima, Japan, 31°25’44”N, 130°11’49”E, 27 June 2009, 27 m; KAUM–I. 59680, 80.0 mm SL, KAUM–I.59681, 73.9 mm SL, off Phuket, Thailand; KAUM–I. 60391, 65.6 mm SL, KAUM–I. 60396, 68.4 mm SL, KAUM–I. 60419, 78.6 mm SL, KAUM–I. 60426, 81.9 mm SL, KAUM–I. 60430, 74.9 mm SL, KAUM–I. 60441, 79.7 mm SL, KAUM–I. 60442, 79.8 mm SL, East China Sea; MNHN 1959-0535, 53.7 mm SL, Manila, Luzon, Philippines, 14°36’00”N, 120°58’59”E; NSMT-P. 63820, 9, 51.0– 58.6 mm SL, NSMT-P. 63833, 52.1 mm SL; NSMT-P. 68755, 71.2 mm SL, Nha Trang, Khánh Hòa, Vietnam; USNM 177742, holotype of Stolephorus buccaneeri , 51.0 mm SL, USNM 177743, 19 paratypes of S. buccaneeri , 42.2–54.5 mm SL, ca. 1.8 km west of Lehua Island off Niihau Island, Hawaiian Islands, 15 Sept. 1958, Noboru Tsue and crew of M/V BUCANEER OF HONOLULU; USNM 177744, 8 paratypes of S. buccaneeri , 37.6–48.3 mm SL, taken from stomach of Euthynnus affinis captured from 1.6 km off Makua, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands, 10 Sept. 1958, M/V MAKUA OF HONOLULU; USNM 417167, 26 of 111, 21.9–70.2 mm SL, east of Agrihan Island, Northern Mariana Islands, 19°02’00”N, 148°25’00”E, 7 Nov. 1971, trawl, 50 m; YCM-P. 39398, 2, 34.9–35.8 mm SL, Atetsu Bay, Amami Island, Kagoshima, Japan, 4 September 1999; ZMA 108.384, 71.3 mm SL, Pidjot Bay, Lombok, Indonesia, 24–26 March 1899; ZMA 108.399, 2, 47.7–59.2 mm SL, Bitung, Sulawesi, Indonesia, 3 December 1909. Examined specimens of other species of Encrasicholina were listed in Hata & Motomura (2015).

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF