Acrobelione halimedae, Boyko & Williams & Shields, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5217688 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F54574-FF8F-FF92-4DCE-FE67FBA499B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acrobelione halimedae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Acrobelione halimedae View in CoL n. sp.
Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3
Material examined. Singapore: Mature non-ovigerous holotype female (7.5 mm), ex right branchial chamber of female Austinogebia spinfrons (8.6 mm CL), Sta. 6, Pulau Tekong (type locality) ( ZRC 1990.4330 View Materials ).
Etymology. This species is named for the tapered and marginally constricted lateral plates and pleopods that are reminiscent of the “segmented” appearance of species in the algal genus Halimeda J. V. Lamoroux, 1812 (e.g., H. cylindracea Descaisne, 1842 ) with subquadrate or cylindrical plates. In Greek mythology, Halimeda was a Nereid, the daughter of Nereus and Doris.
Distribution. Singapore.
Host. Austinogebia spinfrons (Haswell, 1881) (type host).
Description. Female ( Fig. 3 A, B View FIGURE 3 ), body length 8.0 mm, maximal width 6.4 mm, head length 1.5 mm, head width 1.9 mm. No body pigmentation. Pereon weakly sinistral (15°) with coxal plates and pereomeres of right side slightly larger on segments 1–4 ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ). Head slightly wider than long, with thin frontal lamina ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ), deeply embedded medially in first pereomere; eyes lacking.
Antennules of three articles each, antennae of four articles each ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ).
Maxilliped with rounded distal end and subacute recurved spur; palp present as setose, non-articulated lobe ( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 ).
Barbula with 2 pairs of irregular lateral projections with numerous short, finger-like marginal lobes; medial margin with few finger-like, short fleshy projections ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ).
First oostegite anterior lobe rounded, external posterior face with patch of irregular low, fleshy lobes, inner ridge with numerous small rounded projections along ¾ of length; distal lobe subtriangular, slightly recurved ( Fig. 3F, G View FIGURE 3 ). Fourth and fifth oostegites with fringe of setae on posterior margin ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ).
Pereon composed of 7 pereomeres ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ), first 2 markedly curved and rounded at lateral margins, third and fourth nearly laterally straight, rounded at lateral margins except for one side of pereomere 7 which has a posterolateral point ( Fig. 3J View FIGURE 3 ), last 3 slightly curved posteriorly at truncate lateral margins; broadest across pereomere 4, gradually tapering anteriorly and posteriorly; Pereomere 1 with convex posterior margin; posterior margins of pereomeres 2 and 3 nearly straight; posterior margins of pereomeres 4–7 convex ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ). Pereomeres 1–4 with rounded coxal plates, no dorsolateral bosses. Pereomere 4 bilobed laterally, remainder undivided with rounded coxal plates.
First pair of pereopods near anterolateral margin of head; pereopods evenly spaced. Pereopods subequal in size ( Fig. 3H, I View FIGURE 3 ), carpi and meri fused, small tubercles present on lateral faces of some ischia; basis with ridge of larger tubercles ( Fig. 3H, I View FIGURE 3 ).
Pleon with 5 distinct pleomeres plus small pleotelson ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ), pleomeres resembling posterior three pereomeres, but with tapered lateral plates. Lateral plates present distally on pleomeres as elongate, tapered lobes with numerous constrictions along length ( Fig. 3 A, J, K View FIGURE 3 ); lateral region of pleomeres with few, low warty lobes on margins and surface ( Fig. 3 A, K View FIGURE 3 ). First five pleomeres with pair of tapered, elongate, biramous pleopods with lateral constrictions as seen in lateral plates ( Fig. 3L View FIGURE 3 ); pleopods extending beyond lateral plates and visible in dorsal view, mostly on left side of body ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ), all endopods and exopods subequal in size and shape ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ).
Pleotelson not easily seen in dorsal view ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ), bearing pair of uniramous uropods with endopod and exopod subequal in size, both resembling lateral plates and pleopods in having numerous marginal constrictions ( Fig. 3 A, L View FIGURE 3 ).
Male unknown.
Remarks. All species of Acrobelione have females with the barbula possessing lateral projections with numerous short, finger-like lobes on the margins, and lateral plates and pleopods with numerous constrictions along their lengths, as well as pereopods with scattered tubercles on the ischia and a ridge of pronounced tubercles on the bases. This new species is most similar to A. langi ( Van Name, 1920) (see also Bourdon 1981b) but differs from it in the shape of the female’s head (flat frontal margin in A. halimedae n. sp. vs. distinctly medially produced in A. langi ) and the overall body shape (nearly circular in A. halimedae n. sp. vs. ovate in A. langi ). The material (2 females and 2 males) of A. langi examined by Bourdon (1981b) came from hosts collected at the same time and from the same locality as the unique holotype but were not seen by Van Name (1920) and are not type specimens. Acrobelione anisopoda Bourdon, 1981b was described from an immature female and mature male (type host and locality: Gebiacantha talismani (Bouvier, 1915) from off Príncipe, Gulf of Guinea); both show characters of species in Acrobelione , but the female does not have well developed tubercles on the pereopods nor laterally constricted lateral plates or pleopods. However, these differences may be due to the specimen’s immaturity. A key to species in the genus based on mature females is given below, including type host and type locality data.
Although not common, Acrobelione has species known from both gebiidean and axiidean hosts (An et al. 2009). However, Bourdon (1981b) erred when he listed Acrobelione reverberii ( Restivo, 1970) as occurring on U. pusilla because the 66 individuals said by Bourdon (1981b: 120, footnote) to be from this upogebiid host are clearly stated by Restivo (1968) to be from C. truncata . Likewise, the listing by Markham (2001) of A. reverberii occurring on U. pusilla is erroneous; his supposed source for that data ( Restivo, 1970) does not list any host other than Callianassa truncata . Restivo (1968), although listing a “nuova specie” from U. pusilla , also lists one from C. truncata , and this is the correct data that should be associated with A. reverberii .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |