Myrmecium quasimodo, Silva-Junior & Bonaldo, 2019

Silva-Junior, Claudio J. & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2019, Four new species of Myrmecium Latreille, 1824 and complementary description of M. machetero Candiani & Bonaldo, 2017 (Araneae: Corinnidae: Castianeirinae), Zootaxa 4706 (2), pp. 391-400 : 397-400

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4706.2.12

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AA3746AA-1CC2-4195-88AB-4830F384AAAD

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F56A0E-1F29-D279-A0BF-784AFC18FE1A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Myrmecium quasimodo
status

sp. nov.

Myrmecium quasimodo View in CoL sp. nov.

Fig. 5A J View FIGURES 5

Type material. ♂ holotype, Parque Nacional do Jamanxim , 5°26’50.6’’S, 55°54’38.2’’W, Itaituba, Pará, Brazil, 8.XII.2009, leg. N. Abrahim ( MPEG. ARA 36013). Paratypes GoogleMaps : 1♀, Itaituba , 5°34’20.1”S, 57°18’24.3”W, Pará, 30.X.2009, leg. N. Abrahim ( MPGE. ARA 36012) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Parque Nacional da Amazônia , 4°40’29.3”S, 56°26’49.9”W GoogleMaps , Itaituba, Pará, 16.XII.2009, leg. B. Rodrigues ( MPEG. ARA 36014); 1♂, Jacareacanga, 5°53’51.3’’S, 57°41’47.8’’W, Pará, 20.X.2009, leg. N. Abrahim ( MPEG. ARA 36011).

Etymology. The specific name is a noun referring to a fictional character of the 1831 novel “The Hunchback of Notre-Dame” by Victor Hugo, in reference to the characteristic dorsal cymbial hump.

Diagnosis. Males of Myrmecium quasimodo sp. nov. resemble those of M. luepa Candiani & Bonaldo, 2017 by the presence of a conspicuous dorsal cymbial hump ( Fig. 5H View FIGURES 5 ), but differ from the latter by the shorter embolus, which is pointed and with fewer keels. Females resemble those of M. tanguro Candiani & Bonaldo, 2017 by the presence of a semicircular plate in the epigynum, copulatory ducts fused to the secondary spermathecae, and large primary spermathecae, but can be distinguished from the latter species by the secondary spermathecae fused medially ( Figs 5I, J View FIGURES 5 ).

Description. Male (holotype): carapace orange, covered with smaller granules in thoracic region and cephalic region; short, thin white hairs present; long thin black hairs between granules ( Figs 5A, B View FIGURES 5 ); sternum with few granules, red-orange; endites and labium yellowish-orange; chelicerae yellowish-orange. Abdomen light brown, with two dark half-stripes in middle of abdomen, short vitreous brown scutum. Abdominal dorsal scutum fused both anteriorly and laterally to epigastric scutum. Coxae I and II yellowish-white; Fe, Pt, Ti I and II yellowish-brown, with retroventral brown stripe; Ta and Mt I and II brown. Legs III and IV yellowish-brown. Chelicerae: promarginal teeth 3; retromarginal teeth 4. Sternum and carapace fused between legs II and III; coxae II separated from coxae III by more than twice coxa II width; sternal posterior plate T-shaped. Total length 7.16, carapace 4.30 long, 1.00 wide. Eye diameters: AME 0.12, ALE 0.65, PME 0.11, PLE 0.10. Leg measurements: I—femur 2.77 / tibia 2.72 / metatarsus 2.29; II—femur 1.75/ tibia 1.62 / metatarsus 1.30; III— femur 1.62 / tibia 1.33 / metatarsus 1.46; IV—femur 2.90 / tibia 2.24 / metatarsus 2.54. Leg spination: I—tibia vp0-0-0-1-0, vr0-0-1-1-0; metatarsus vp1-0-1-0-0, vr1- 0-1-0-0. II—tibia vp1-0-1-0-0, vr1-0-1-0-0; metatarsus vp1-0-0-1-0, vr1-0-1-0-0. III—tibia p0-0-0-0-0, r0-0-0-0-0, vp0-1-0-1-0, vr0-1-0-1- 0; metatarsus p0-0-0-0-0, r0-0-0-0-0, vp1-0-0-0-0, vr1-0-0-0-0. IV—tibia p0-0-0-0-0, r0- 0-0-0-0, vp0-0-0-1-0, vr0-0-0-0-0; metatarsus p1-0-0-0-0, r1-0-0-0-0, vp1-0-0-0-0, vr1-0-0-0-0. Palp. Tibia longer than wide, ventral excavation present, RTA medium-sized in relation to tibia, flattened and pointing apically; first fold of reservoir reaching middle of tegulum, second fold basal, third fold accentuated, retrolateral; distal sector sinuous. Tegular neck before embolus insertion present ( Figs 5G, H View FIGURES 5 ).

Female: Habitus in Figs 5 View FIGURES 5 D–F. Chelicerae: promarginal teeth 3; retromarginal teeth 4. Total length 8.16, carapace 8.46 long, 1.16 wide. Eye diameters: AME 0.12, ALE 0.62, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10. Leg measurements: I—fe- mur 2.70 / tibia 2.68 / metatarsus 2.12; II—femur 1.66/ tibia 1.62 / metatarsus 1.31; III— femur 1.90 / tibia 1.44 / metatarsus 1.38; IV—femur 2.73 / tibia 2.25 / metatarsus 2.42. Leg spination: I—tibia vp0-0-0-1-0, vr0-0-1-1- 0; metatarsus vp1-0-1-0-0, vr1-0-1-0-0. II—tibia vp1-0-1-0-0, vr1-0-1-0-0; metatarsus vp1-0-0-1-0, vr1-0-1-0-0. III—tibia p0-0-0-0-0, r0-0-0-0-0, vp0-1-0-1-0, vr0-1-0-1- 0; metatarsus p0-0-0-0-0, r0-0-0-0-0, vp1-0-0-0-0, vr1-0- 0-0-0. IV—tibia p0-0-0-0-0, r0-0-0-0-0, vp0-0-0-1-0, vr0-0-0-0-0; metatarsus p1-0-0-0-0, r1-0-0-0-0, vp1-0-0-0-0, vr1-0-0-0-0. Epigynum: Copulatory openings positioned laterally, apertures oriented antero-laterally. Secondary spermathecae fused medially, neck short, primary spermathecae globular; glandular knob present ( Figs 5I, J View FIGURES 5 ).

Material examined. Only the types.

Distribution. Known from southwestern State of Pará, Brazil ( Map 2 View MAP 2 ).

MPEG

Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Corinnidae

Genus

Myrmecium

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF