Schizoporella errata ( Waters, 1878 )

Tompsett, Scott, Porter, Joanne S. & Taylor, Paul D., 2009, Taxonomy of the fouling cheilostome bryozoans Schizoporella unicornis (Johnston) and Schizoporella errata (Waters), Journal of Natural History 43 (35 - 36), pp. 2227-2243: 2234-2238

publication ID

http://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930903090140

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F587A2-FF82-FF91-FE0E-53FB4CD5FC8C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Schizoporella errata ( Waters, 1878 )
status

 

Schizoporella errata ( Waters, 1878)  

( Figures 3A–F View Figure 3 , 4A–F View Figure 4 )

Eschara spongites Pallas, 1766   (partim), p. 45.

Lepralia spinifera Busk, 1854   (partim), p. 69, pl. 91, figs 1,2.

Lepralia spinifera   c) L. serialis Heller, 1867, p. 104   .

Lepralia spinifera   d) L. spongites Heller, 1867, p. 104   .

Lepralia errata Waters, 1878, p. 11   , pl. 1, fig. 9.

Lepralia errata, Stadium Hemeschara Waters, 1879, p. 39   , pl. 10, fig. 5.

Schizoporella unicornis (Johnston)   : Waters, 1909 (partim), p. 143, pl. 12, figs 12, 13. Schizoporella errata (Waters)   : Calvet, 1902, p. 23; Gautier, 1962, p. 149, fig. 151; Ryland, 1965, p. 64, fig. 31a,b; Hastings, 1967, p. 336; Hayward and Ryland, 1999, p. 212.

Schizoporella unicornis var. errata (Waters)   : Calvet, 1927, p. 16.

Schizopodrella violacea Canu and Bassler, 1930, p. 40   , pl. 4, figs 1–14.

Schizopodrella errata (Waters)   : Canu and Bassler, 1930, p. 39; Barroso, 1935, p. 373, figs 1, 2.

Material

Lectotype (here chosen). MM H1186.3113, Bay of Naples , specimen labelled ‘ Stadium Hemeschara   , boiled in potash’, figured by Waters (1879, p. 39, pl. 10, fig. 5) ( Figure 3A–F View Figure 3 herein).  

Other material (topotypic). NHM 2009.1.26.1, ( Figure 4A View Figure 4 ). Bleached, Nisida Harbour, Naples, Italy and NHM 2009.1.26.2, ( Figure 4B–F View Figure 4 ). Bleached, Nisida Harbour, Naples, Italy.

Description

Colony encrusting, multiserial, unilamellar or multilamellar as the result of frontal budding, sometimes tubular (“hemescharan”) growing around arborescent epibiota such as hydroids. Colour varying from white (at growth tips) to red and purple/ brown in the older, multilamellar regions.

Basal autozooids longer than wide, 381–558 µm (mean 494 µm, SD 43 µm, n = 31) long by 263–508 µm (mean 371 µm, SD 71 µm, n = 31) wide, almost as wide as long at row bifurcations, surrounded by a distinct suture line; areolar pores deep. Frontally budded autozooids less consistent in shape, often more rounded. Frontal shield in basal zooids slightly convex, more so in frontally budded zooids. Pseudopores present everywhere apart from area distal of primary orifice, polygonal in early ontogeny ( Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ), later reduced by secondary calcification, becoming occluded before frontal budding. Primary orifice broad, 125–172 µm (mean 147 µm, SD 11 µm; n = 25) long by 125–181 µm (mean 154 µm, SD 15 µm; n = 26,) wide. Anter broad, D-shaped, sinus (poster) U-shaped, broader than deep. When the operculum is removed, the edge of primary orifice adjacent to the condyles runs slightly distally from sinus to proximolateral corners (i.e. slopes upwards). Condyles small with acute tips.

Adventitious avicularia generally single, developing proximolaterally to the primary orifice and orientated distolaterally from midline, small (mean 137 µm, SD 19 µm, n = 10). Rostrum pointed distally with concave sides and hooked tip. Opesia rounded, deeply D-shaped, no columella. Mandible with curved tip. Avicularia occasionally develop proximal to orifice and occupy a large proportion of frontal shield. Larger than regular adventitious avicularia but with similarly shaped rostrum and opesium. Mandible orientated proximally.

Ovicells not present in type specimen. In topotype material ovicells are globular, rounded, recumbent on the distal zooid, and have surfaces completely covered by pores but lacking radial ridges.

Remarks

Like S. unicornis   , the introduction of S. errata   is somewhat confused. Waters (1878) first mentioned the name in a study of cheilostome opercula. A more thorough and recognizable description was subsequently provided by Waters (1879), in which reference was made to a particular specimen described as “Stadium, Hemeschara   ” (i.e. with a tubular colony-form). It is very likely that Waters was referring to the same material in both publications. Hastings (1967) revised the synonymy of S. errata   and attempted to designate a lectotype. However, she listed this putative lectotype under the Manchester Museum catalogue number HII86, a catalogue number prefix used for the entire Waters Collection at the museum. Fortunately, a specimen matching the descriptions of Waters (1879) and Hastings (1967) was found in the MM and has been examined by SEM.

The description by Waters (1879: 39) of this species reads:

“(A)n encrusting piece, measuring 9 × 10 mm. It consists of a regular layer of straightsided zooecia over which two successive layers of superficial zooecia are spreading. The superficial zooecia are larger, irregular in shape and orientation and more rounded in outline...”

This description draws attention to the notable differences in zooidal morphology at different astogenetic and ontogenetic stages. This has no doubt been a cause of taxonomic confusion in past descriptions, which have often focused on zooids from any of the following three growth stages: (1) basal zooids of the unilaminar “primogenial” stage; (2) frontally budded zooids at early ontogenetic stages with minimal secondary calcification; or (3) frontally budded zooids at late ontogenetic stages with heavy secondary calcification of the frontal shield.

The true identities of S. errata- like specimens from places distant from the type locality remain open to question. The ability of S. errata   to foul man-made structures, such as gas rigs ( Relini et al. 1998) and ships ( Ryland 1965; Gordon and Mawatari 1992) has no doubt mediated its transfer to ports around the world, where it has become highly invasive ( Hayward and McKinney 2002). Furthermore, the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 may have played a role in its transfer between the Mediterranean and the Red Seas ( Eitan 1972). However, as highlighted by Winston (2005), it is possible that S. errata   is part of a species complex that includes S. pungens (Canu and Bassler, 1928)   and S. isabelleana (d’Orbigny, 1842)   . To complicate this issue further a subspecies called S. unicornis floridana (Osburn, 1914)   has been recognized in a number of works ( Maturo 1957; Banta 1971, 1972; Soule at al. 1995). The origin of this species complex may have predated anthropogenic exchange, with species morphologically similar to S. errata   being present in the Pliocene deposits of North Carolina and Jamaica ( Taylor and Foster 1998). Redescription of the type material here should aid in deciding whether fossil material and that of S. pungens   belongs to the same species. Fossil material of S. errata   has not been found in any of the European deposits during the course of our investigation. Therefore, it may be the case that this species has been introduced anthropogenically or otherwise into the Mediterranean in recent times. However, because of high levels of intracolonial morphological plasticity, it is likely that the true identity of the Recent S. errata   complex will only be confirmed using molecular techniques.

Compared to S. unicornis   , S. errata   differs in the shape of the primary orifice. In S. unicornis   the edge of the primary orifice adjacent to condyles is directed proximally from the sinus towards the proximolateral corners of the orifice, whereas in S. errata   it is directed slightly distally. In addition, the structure of the pseudopores differs, forming within shallow polygonal, almost octagonal, recesses in the early ontogeny of S. errata   but not S. unicornis   . Also diagnostic of S. unicornis   are the scalloped ridges around the edges of the ovicells and imperforate central region. Schizoporella unicornis   does not undergo frontal budding, unlike S. errata   .

No ancestrulae were apparent in either the lectotype or associated material. However, according to Ryland (1965) and Hayward and Ryland (1999), these are tatiform and have eight oral spines.

MM

University of Montpellier

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Bryozoa

Class

Gymnolaemata

Order

Cheilostomatida

Family

Schizoporellidae

Genus

Schizoporella

Loc

Schizoporella errata ( Waters, 1878 )

Tompsett, Scott, Porter, Joanne S. & Taylor, Paul D. 2009
2009
Loc

Schizopodrella violacea

Canu F & Bassler RS 1930: 40
1930
Loc

Schizopodrella errata (Waters)

Barroso MG 1935: 373
Canu F & Bassler RS 1930: 39
1930
Loc

Schizoporella unicornis var. errata (Waters)

Calvet L 1927: 16
1927
Loc

Schizoporella unicornis (Johnston)

Hayward PJ & Ryland JS 1999: 212
Hastings AB 1967: 336
Ryland JS 1965: 64
Gautier YV 1962: 149
Calvet L 1902: 23
1902
Loc

Lepralia errata

Waters AW 1879: 39
1879
Loc

Lepralia errata

Waters AW 1878: 11
1878
Loc

Lepralia spinifera

Heller C 1867: 104
1867
Loc

Lepralia spinifera

Heller C 1867: 104
1867