Micronotus, Hancock, 1902
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5082.2.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF3FD783-72C8-4C39-8AF5-20FADD9F41BF |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5786262 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F587BB-FF86-FFC1-639B-FF01FA4C76E9 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Micronotus |
| status |
|
Key to Micronotus View in CoL species
1. Mid-femur without conspicuous carinae. Pronotum without exceeding the apex of the abdomen and the hind femur ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 2B View FIGURE 2 , 4B View FIGURE 4 , 5B View FIGURE 5 ); pronotal disc with a wavy midline from anterior to the posterior edge ( Figs. 1A View FIGURE 1 , 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 )............ ... 3
‒ Mid femur conspicuously carinate. Pronotum exceeding the apex of the abdomen and hind femur ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ); pronotal disc with a small hump at the level of the prozone, thereafter no additional undulations ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 )..................... M. asperulus View in CoL
2. Ocelli conspicuous, as wide as the antennal pedicelus ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). Hind wings reduced, especially to the female. Fastigium rounded, slightly protruding in the middle of the eyes in lateral view ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 )...................... M. quadriundulatus View in CoL
‒ Ocelli of medium size, as wide as half the width of the antennal pedicelus ( Figs. 4C View FIGURE 4 and 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Hind wings moderately developed, failing to reach the pronotal apex. Fastigium conical, protruding conspicuously from the middle of the eyes in lateral view ( Figs. 4A View FIGURE 4 and 5A View FIGURE 5 )........................................................................ M. andeanum n. comb.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.