Celaenorrhinus taiwanus Matsumura, 1919
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3881.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C1E7F95E-B3FC-4D14-A46E-A93B1556E664 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6137277 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F6E414-FFA2-FB3E-FF4E-FD7F921BFDF3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Celaenorrhinus taiwanus Matsumura, 1919 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Celaenorrhinus taiwanus Matsumura, 1919 View in CoL stat. rev.
Figs. 5–6 View FIGURES 1 – 20 , 35–40 View FIGURES 35 – 40
Celaenorrhinus taiwanus Matsumura, 1919: 686 View in CoL , pl. L, fig. 22 (Type locality: Taiwan). Celaenorrhinus maculosa taiwanus: Evans, 1949: 93 View in CoL .
Celaenorrhinus maculosus taiwanus: Shirôzu, 1960: 383 ; Chou, 1994: 703; Hsu et al, 2006: 326.
Diagnosis. Forewing length 24 mm. Wings brown. Forewing upperside with subapical spots in R4 smaller than spots in space R3 and R5, latter two spots equal in size; cell spot and spot in space CuA1 overlapped; spot in space M3 is smaller than that in CuA2; two spots in CuA2 almost rounded, lower spot slightly larger; forewing underside basal striping much reduced and faint. Hindwing upperside with the spot in space Rs small and faint.
Male genitalia ( Figs. 35–40 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ). Gnathos well developed, densely covered with spines; valva nearly rectangular, dorso-distal part of valva narrow and small bifid; aedeagus robust; cornuti well developed and curved; juxta deeply quadrifurcated and branches equal.
Material examined. 2♂, Puli, Nantou County, Taiwan, VII-1974, Igarashi Suguru; 1♂, Qingquan, Xinzhu County, Taiwan, 10-VII-1991, Igarashi Suguru; 1♂, Taipingshan, Taiwan, 27–30-VIII-1926, Kato Masayo; 1♂, Jiayi County, Taiwan, 10-VIII-1925, Kato Masayo; 1♂, Xinzhu County, Taiwan, 30-VI-1988, Ra [Luo].
Distribution ( Fig. 68). China ( Taiwan).
Remarks. Matsumura (1919) described taiwanus as a distinct species. Evans (1949) treated it as a subspecies of C. maculosus , and the subsequent authors have followed the treatment ( Shirôzu, 1960; Chou, 1994; Hsu et al., 2006). We examined 6 specimens, as well as referring to Shirôzu, 1960, fig. 419, pl. 905–907. Its wing patterns and male genitalia are rather constant, and show that it and the so-called nominate subspecies are significantly prominent in the following characteristics: forewing underside, basal striping much reduced in taiwanus (very developed in maculosus ); cell spot and spot in space CuA1 overlapped in taiwanus (separated in maculosus ); hindwing upperside with spot in space Rs small and faint in taiwanus (large and distinct in maculosus ); valva with distal end vertical, narrow and small U-shaped at the tip in taiwanus (distal end oblique, shallowly V-shaped at the tip in maculosus ); juxta branches equal in length, with lined mid-basal ridge in taiwanus (lateral branches less than 1/2 length of two middle branches, spherical mid-basal process in maculosus ). So, we agree with Matsumura that it is a good species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Celaenorrhinus taiwanus Matsumura, 1919
Huang, Zhen-Fu, Chiba, Hideyuki, Fei, Wen & Fan, Xiao-Ling 2014 |
Celaenorrhinus maculosus taiwanus: Shirôzu, 1960 : 383
Hsu 2006: 326 |
Chou 1994: 703 |
Shirozu 1960: 383 |
Celaenorrhinus taiwanus
Evans 1949: 93 |
Matsumura 1919: 686 |