Enigmatochromis, Lamboj, Anton, 2009

Lamboj, Anton, 2009, A new dwarf cichlid genus and species (Teleostei, Cichlidae) from Guinea, West Africa, Zootaxa 2173, pp. 41-48 : 42-44

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.275090

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CD855E3D-F564-4F8D-B2A6-5E40411C08C5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6214561

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/945A98EC-0FF1-482F-9790-0A0DCDFE7DBD

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:945A98EC-0FF1-482F-9790-0A0DCDFE7DBD

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Enigmatochromis
status

gen. nov.

Enigmatochromis View in CoL new genus

( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 & 2 View FIGURE 2 .; Table 1)

Type species. Enigmatochromis lucanusi , new species by original designation.

Diagnosis. The new genus is distinguished from all other chromidotilapiine genera by a unique combination of characters. It posseses twelve scales around the caudal peduncle vs. (13 or 14 scales) in Limbochromis Greenwood 1987 , (14–16 scales) in Chromidotilapia, Boulenger 1898 , and (16 scales) in Benitochromis Lamboj 2001 , Pelvicachromis Thys van den Audenaerde 1968 and Thysochromis Daget 1988 . Among the remaining chromidotilapiine genera with twelve circumpenducular scales this new genus is further distinguished from Congochromis Stiassny & Schliewen 2007 and Nanochromis Pellegrin 1904 by: an infraorbital series containing a lachrymal and three additional tubular bones, and a gap between the 2nd and 3rd tubular infraorbitals (vs. lachrymal and one tubular bone), plus the lateral line is clearly separated from the dorsal-fin base (vs. posterior part contiguous with the dorsal-fin base). It is distinguished from Divandu Lamboj & Snoeks 2000 by: an infraorbital series with a lachrymal and three additional tubular bones and a gap between the 2nd and 3rd tubular infraorbitals (vs. four tubular bones), only four openings of the laterosensory system in the lachrymal bone (vs. five), the first ray of pelvic fin in adult females is of equal length or longer than second ray of this fin (vs. first ray always longer), being a pair-bonding cave breeder (vs. a mouthbrooder), and by well developed sexual dichromatism (vs. weakly developed). Finally it is distinguished from Parananochromis Greenwood 1987 by: an infraorbital series with a lachrymal and three additional tubular bones with a gap between the 2nd and 3rd tubular infraorbitals (vs. four tubular bones in some species of Parananochromis ), juveniles with 3 or 4 rows of irregular dark brown to black dots on body (vs. maximum of 2 rows), and the first ray of pelvic fin in adult females of equal length or longer than the second ray of this fin (vs. second ray slightly longer or of equal length).

Etymology. Enigma from enigmatic, refers to the somewhat intermediate characters between Pelvicachromis and Parananochromis in possessing pigmentation similarities to the first, but anatomical similarities to the second genus; and chromis – a common ending for African cichlid fishes. Gender masculine.

% of caudal peduncle depth

Caudal peduncle length 74.4 71.7 7.0 58.7–86.3

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF