Limnochares danielei Gerecke & Smit
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170186 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6267664 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F7DE69-B05C-FFF2-FEF6-FD9FFDE48313 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Limnochares danielei Gerecke & Smit |
status |
sp. nov. |
Limnochares danielei Gerecke & Smit , sp. nov.
Type series: Holotype male, Cyprus, South of Prodromos, unnamed creek at crossing with road E 804, 22.04.2002 leg. H. Smit, slide mounted together with a paratype male in Hoyers medium ( ZMAN); paratypes (same site and date): one male, slide mounted together with the holotype, one male, two females, slide mounted in Hoyers medium; three males, five females undissected, in Koenikes fluid ( ZMAN).
Diagnosis: Idiosoma L 1500–2000, dorsum bearing five pairs of rodshaped sclerites and, in the posterior part, one unpaired transverse or triangular sclerite; frontal shield short and robust (L/H ratio 1.9–2.1); Cx1+2 ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A E) enlarged (L/ W 1.3 –1.6), anterolateral edge with a digitiform, densely setose extension, coxal setae rather long; genital field ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A F) with 33–44 pairs of acetabula; genital setae in both sexes not arranged in groups; excretory pore surrounded by a sclerotized ring; palp ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. A – F G) fivesegmented with a relatively long P4 (L 25, L ratio P2/P 4 in females 1.8, in males 2.2).
Description: General morphology as in L. azubi , but all specimens with a sclerotized ring surrounding the excretory pore (if no details are given, morphology as described for L. azubi ).
Males (n = 2): Idiosoma L 1600; frontal sclerite L/W 250–290/135–140; anterodorsal sclerites L 120–150, 190–200; posterodorsal sclerite diameter 60–100; Cx1 maximum L/ anterior margin W 290/180–190 (1.5–1.6); Cx3/4 maximum L/anterior W (excluding the subcutaneous apodemes) 370–385/190–195 (2.0); leg IV measurements (L/H) of one paratype: IVL4 175/55 (3.2), IVL5 200/55 (3.6), IVL6 190/50 (3.8); Ac number 70–78, genital setae number 22–26; gnathosoma L 210–240, H 130, W 165, mouth disc diameter 55–60; chelicera basal segment L/H 210/45, claw L 32 (L/H ratio 5.4, basal segment/claw L ratio 6.6); palp segments L/H P 1 10/25, P2 55/40, P3 40/35, P 4 25/25, P 5 25/9, total L 155.
Females (n = 2): Idiosoma L 1500–2000; frontal sclerite L/W 300–310/150–160; anterodorsal sclerites L 115–185, 105–165; Cx1 maximum L/anterior margin W 310–335/205–230 (1.5); Cx3/4 maximum L/anterior W (excluding the subcutaneous apodemes) 400–460/205–230 (2.0); leg IV measurements (L/H) of one paratype: IVL4 200/70 (2.9), IVL5 230/60 (3.8), IVL6 220/60 (3.7); Ac number 87–89, genital setae number 19–24; gnathosoma L 250–275, H 140, W 170, mouth disc diameter 65; chelicera basal segment L 250, claw L 35 (basal segment/claw L ratio 7.2); palp segments L/H P 1 12/27, P2 62/42, P3 48/37, P 4 35/26, P 5 27/10, total L 184.
Deutonymph: Unknown.
Dervivatio nominis: Named after our friend and colleague Daniele Benfatti (1957–2004).
Discussion: This species is obviously closely related to L. azubi . Common characters that separate both species from L. aquatica are the shape and arrangement of the dorsal sclerites, the presence of a setose anterior extension of Cx1, and the relatively low number of acetabula. Limnochares danielei differs from L. azubi in the relatively enlarged anterior coxal plates (L/W <1.7, in L. azubi 1.7–2.1) with longer setae, and a longer, more inflated P4 (L 25–35, in L. azubi 14–20). Furthermore, all specimens have the excretory pore surrounded by a sclerotized ring, while in L. azubi a structure of this type was found only in one exceptional case, presumably a specimen that had undergone an additional adult moult this specimen differs in having a very high number of 155 acetabula whereas all other specimens of both L. azubi and L. danielei have fewer (<100). Limnochares danielei , like L. azubi , differs from the American species, L. anomala , in the presence of a setose projection on Cx1.
ZMAN |
Instituut voor Taxonomische Zoologie, Zoologisch Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |