Porcellio pseudornatus, Taiti & Rossano, 2015
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2015.1009512 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DCBF3103-1463-4A32-9BC0-A4CFE8B762AE |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4337130 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F88793-6B77-6449-3A2C-FE46FEEDFEFA |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Porcellio pseudornatus |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Porcellio pseudornatus View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figures 23–25 View Figure 23 View Figure 24 View Figure 25 )
Material examined
Holotype: ♂, St. 5, under stones near beach, leg. S. Taiti and C. Rossano, 1 May 2004 ( MZUF 9510 View Materials ) . Paratypes: 7 ♂♂, 10 ♀♀, same data as holotype ( MZUF 9510 View Materials ) ; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, same data as holotype ( SMNS 15674 View Materials ) ; 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀, St. 2, under stones at base of cliff, leg. S. Taiti and C. Rossano, 1 May 2004 ( MZUF 9511 View Materials ) ; 1 ♀, St. 7, leg. S. Taiti, 29 April 2004 ( MZUF 9512 View Materials ) ; 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, St. 9, under stones in meadow, leg. S. Taiti, 28 April 2004 ( MZUF 9513 View Materials ) ; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, St. 14, Phillyrea wood, leg. S. Taiti, 27 April 2004 ( MZUF 9514 View Materials ) ; 1 ♂, same locality, leg. S. Taiti and C. Rossano, 27 September 2005 ( MZUF 9515 View Materials ) ; 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀, St. 16, along road margin under stones, leg. S. Taiti, 28 April 2004 ( MZUF 9516 View Materials ) ; 2 ♀♀, St. 17, leg. S. Taiti, 29 April 2004 ( MZUF 9517 View Materials ) .
Other material examined
1 ♂, 1 ♀, Al Hoceima, near road under stones, leg. C. Rossano, 4 May 2004 ( MZUF 9518 View Materials ) .
Description
Maximum length: ♂, 22 mm; ♀, 23 mm. Body outline as in Figure 23A View Figure 23 . Colour brown-grey with pale marginal parts of frontal lateral lobes and epimera of pereon and pleon; sometimes with two paramedian yellowish round spots on pereonites 5–7 and pleonites 2–4; antennae uniformly grey, pereopods and pleopod 1–2 exopods pale, pleopod 3–5 exopods dark. Dorsal surface of cephalon, pereon and pleon distinctly granulated with many scattered short triangular scale-setae ( Figure 22B View Figure 22 ); numerous gland pores in rounded fields disposed near the anterior corner of pereonite 1 and more or less in the middle of pereonites 2–7 close to the lateral margins of the segments ( Figure 22A, E View Figure 22 ); noduli laterales small, the ones on pereonites 1–4 inserted about twice more distant from the lateral margin than those on pereonites 5–7 ( Figure 23A View Figure 23 ). Cephalon ( Figure 22C, D View Figure 22 ) with no suprantennal line; large rounded lateral lobes obliquely bent downwards and distinctly protruding frontwards, median lobe widely rounded, often slightly incised at the apex; eye with about 30 ommatidia. Pereonites 1–3 with hind margin slightly concave at sides, more distinct on pereonite 1; pereonites 3–7 with posterior corners bent backwards and progressively more acute. Pleonites 3–5 with falciform epimera ( Figure 23A, F View Figure 23 ); tips of pleonite 5 epimera reaching 2/3 of telson length. Telson ( Figure 23F View Figure 23 ) about twice as wide as long with a triangular distal part. Antennule ( Figure 23G View Figure 23 ) with first article distinctly longer than second and third; third article with a tuft of short aesthetascs near the apex. Antenna ( Figure 23H View Figure 23 ) reaching back or slightly surpassing the posterior margin of pereonite 3; fifth article of peduncle shorter than flagellum; first flagellar article about twice as long as second. Mandibles ( Figure 24A, B View Figure 24 ) with molar penicil dichotomized and a line of eight free penicils. Maxillule ( Figure 24C View Figure 24 ) outer branch with 4 + 6 teeth, all simple; inner branch with a distinct posterior point and two long and thin penicils. Maxilla ( Figure 24D View Figure 24 ) bilobate with setose apex, inner lobe quadrangular, much smaller than outer one; two long setae on the margin between the two lobes. Maxilliped ( Figure 24E View Figure 24 ) endite with two small triangular setae on distal margin and no penicil; first article of palp with two strong setae. Pleopodal exopods 1 and 2 with monospiracular covered lungs ( Figure 25C, D View Figure 25 ). Uropod ( Figure 23A, F View Figure 23 ) with a triangular depression on protopodal outer margin, not visible in dorsal view.
Male: Uropodal exopods ( Figure 23F View Figure 23 ) flattened, elongated and much longer than in females (4 times as long as wide in males, less than 3 times in females). Merus and carpus of pereopod 1 ( Figure 25A View Figure 25 ) to 4 and, to a lesser extent, 5 with a brush of pointed setae. Pereopod 7 ( Figure 25B View Figure 25 ) ischium distally enlarged with a transversal depression and a setose area on rostral surface; sternal margin slightly convex; carpus with a large rounded lobe on distal half of tergal margin. Pleopod 1 ( Figure 25C View Figure 25 ) exopod with long medial lobe with parallel sides, oblique and sinuous distal margin with three strong setae at apex, and some short setae along the medial margin; endopod with distal part straight, rounded and setose apex. Pleopod 2 ( Figure 25D View Figure 25 ) exopod triangular and slightly shorter than endopod. Pleopod 3–5 exopods as in Figure 25E–G View Figure 25 .
Etymology
From the stem of the Greek ‘Pseudes’ = false, erroneous + ornatus . The species name refers to the similarity with Porcellio ornatus Milne-Edwards , from south-eastern Spain.
Remarks
According to Vandel (1958a), four species of the Rif-Betic group of Porcellio occur in the Rif region: P. ornatus Milne-Edwards ; P. wagneri Brandt, 1841 ; P. hoffmannseggii Brandt, 1833 ; and P. echinatus Lucas, 1849 . The specimens here examined do not seem to belong to any of these four species, nor to any other species in this group, even if they are strictly related to P. ornatus and P. wagneri . Specimens of P. ornatus collected from the type locality in south-eastern Spain (many ♂♂ and ♀♀, Cartagena, Murcia, leg. M. Rizzotti Vlach, 4 August 1981, MZUF 9594) have been examined and are here illustrated ( Figures 26 View Figure 26 and 27 View Figure 27 ) for comparison with our specimens from the Oued Laou basin. Porcellio pseudornatus differs from P. ornatus in the dorsal body surface more granulated, wider dorsal scale-setae, posterior margin of pereonites 1–3 more concave at the sides, thinner antennae, much longer male uropodal exopods and more pronounced rounded lobe on the male pereopod 7 carpus. According to the figures provided by Lucas (1849, plate 6, Figures 6A–C View Figure 6 ); for P. wagneri originally described from Algeria, the new species differs in having the male uropodal exopods much wider (4 times as long as wide vs. 7.5 times in P. wagneri ). The material of P. ornatus and P. wagneri from the Rif studied by Vandel (1958a) needs to be re-examined to confirm that also these two species are present in the area.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.