Grandigallia M.E. Barr et al.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.147.2.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F887AF-3D35-FFFA-F9E5-34BBFBC7FD5E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Grandigallia M.E. Barr et al. |
status |
|
Grandigallia M.E. Barr et al. View in CoL , Mycotaxon 29: 196. 1987.
MycoBank MB12090
Parasitic on Polylepis cericea (Rosaceae) Ascostromata scattered, tissues composed of large thick-walled, with two to numerous locules. Locules base embedded and upper region becoming erumpent, globose to subglobose or obpyriform, coriaceous, rough, ostiolate. Ostiole broadly papillate, ostiolar canal filled with periphyses. Peridium comprising several layers of thick-walled, brown to dark brown. Hamathecium composed of dense cellular, septate, anastomosing and branched pseudoparaphyses. Asci 8-spored, fissitunicate, clavate to sub-cylindrical with a minute ocular chamber. Ascospores uniseriate or distichously arranged, partially overlapping, ellipsoidal to fusoid, but becoming narrowed towards the poles, brown to chestnut brown, multi-septate. Asexual state: unknown.
Type species: Grandigallia dictyospora M.E. Barr et al. View in CoL , Mycotaxon 29: 196 (1987), MycoBank: MB 130504. FIG. 3 A–N View FIGURE 3 .
Parasitic on Polylepis cericea (Rosaceae) . Ascostromata scattered, tissues composed of large thick-walled, dark brown to black cells, with two to numerous locules. Locules 610–700× 450–600 µm (x = 650× 500 µm, n = 10), base embedded and upper region becoming erumpent, globose to subglobose or obpyriform, wall dark brown to black, coriaceous, rough, ostiolate. Ostiole broadly papillate, ostiolar canal filled with a tissue of hyaline cells. Peridium 60–70 µm (x = 65 µm, n = 10) wide, comprising several layers of thick-walled, brown to dark brown, heavily pigmented small cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium composed of dense 2– 3 µm diam (x = 2.5 µm, n = 20), broad, numerous, cellular, septate, anastomosing and branched pseudoparaphyses, embedded in gelatinous matrix between and above the asci. Asci 100–250× 25–50 µm (x = 160× 30 µm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate to sub-cylindrical, thickened and rounded at the apex and minute ocular chamber with a short, broad, pedicel. Ascospores 60–80× 15–20 µm (x = 70× 17 µm, n = 40), wide uniseriate or distichously arranged, partially overlapping, ellipsoidal to fusoid, but becoming narrowed towards the poles, brown to chestnut brown, multi-septate, thick, smooth-walled, without a sheath. Asexual state: unknown.
Notes: Grandigallia View in CoL was introduced by Barr (1987) and is monotypic, represented by Grandigallia dictyospora View in CoL . The fungus was collected on branches of Polylepis sericea in Venezuela where it forms large stromatic tissues on the host ( Barr 1987) A similar fungus was observed by Lewis [Ludwig] David von Schweinitz in 1822 on branches of Prunus sp. in north America, but these are clearly differentiated from Grandigallia View in CoL in the shape of the ascomata, septation and colour of the ascospores ( Barr 1987) Grandigallia View in CoL is somewhat similar to Shiraia bambusicola ( Hennings 1900) View in CoL . Grandigallia View in CoL shares similar characters to Shiraia View in CoL in producing conspicuous stromatic tissues on the host, with papillate ostioles and muriform ascospores. Grandigallia View in CoL differs in having black (as compared to orange) ascostromata, the thickness of the locule peridium (60–70 µm versus 30–40 µm)and in having asci with eight (versus six) ascospores. Barr (1987) suggested that Teichospora View in CoL also shares some common features with Grandigallia View in CoL in possessing muriform ascospores and obpyriform ascomata with a thick, layered peridium, but species of Teichospora View in CoL do not form stromatic tissues on the host.
Based on the above morphological characters we suggest that Grandigallia View in CoL can be referred to Pleosporales View in CoL where it may be related to Shiraiacaeae. Therefore we place Grandigallia View in CoL in Shiraiaceae View in CoL . Molecular studies are needed to confirm this placement.
Material examined: Venezuela, Merida, parasitic on Polylepis sericea , December 1984, L. Cedeno, J. Parra, R. Hernandez (NY, isotype)
Schizothyriaceae Höhn. ex Trotter, Sacc., D. Sacc. & Traverso [as 'Schizothyrieae'], in Saccardo, Syll. fung. (Abellini) 24(2): 1254. 1928.
MycoBank: MB 81266
= Microthyriellaceae Luttr., Univ. Mo. Stud. 24(3): 79. 1951.
The family Schizothyriaceae was introduced by Höhn. ex Trotter, Sacc., D. Sacc. & Traverso (1928), and typified with Schizothyrium acerinum ( Hyde et al. 2013) Initially Clypeolum, Mycrothyriella , Polyclypeolum , Phragmothyriella and Schizothyrium were accepted to the family ( Hyde et al. 2013) The family is characterized by superficial, scutate or dimidiate, subcuticular ascomata or hysterothecia opening via a longitudinal slit, clavate, spherical or obovoid asci surrounded by a slimy mass or paraphyses-like filaments and uni to multi septate, hyaline or brownish ascospores ( Hyde et al. 2013)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
Grandigallia M.E. Barr et al.
Ariyawansa, Hiran A., Kang, Ji-Chuan, Alias, Siti A., Chukeatirote, Ekachai & Hyde, Kevin D. 2013 |
Grandigallia M.E. Barr et al.
M. E. Barr et al. 1987: 196 |