Maraplia chico, Shear & Marek, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5205.6.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9D1DEC25-5FA2-4D64-807E-F103C3FCB5CA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7318641 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F89303-FFB4-FFBB-9AF9-2861E1B6FC15 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Maraplia chico, Shear & Marek |
status |
sp. nov. |
Maraplia chico, Shear & Marek , n. sp.
Figs 12–15 View FIGURES 10–15 , 58–60 View FIGURES 56–62
Types: Male holotype from West Branch of Feather River , Butte Co., California, 39.8290°N, 121.7734°W, 1600’ asl, sift in goak and grape litter(sample#81-291),collected 13April1981 byD. S.Chandler; GoogleMaps Male paratype (SEMstubWS35-7) from same locality, but collected sifting laurel litter; GoogleMaps two male paratypes from 4 mi SE of Chico, Butte Co. , California, sifting elderberry and oak litter (sample 79-12), 39.6877°N, - 121.7734°W, 200’ asl, collected 24 February 1979 by D. S. Chandler. All specimens deposited in FMNH GoogleMaps .
Etymology: The species epithet is a noun in apposition, after one of the paratype localities near the town of Chico, California.
Diagnosis: Differs from M. napa n. sp., in having males with 30 rings and from M. schusteri , n. sp., in the much shorter, sharply deflexed anterior angiocoxites of the gonopods ( Figs 58, 59 View FIGURES 56–62 , aac).
Description: Male paratype. Length, about 3.5 mm, width 0.35 mm. Thirty postcephalic rings including telson. Two black ommatidia on each side of head. Color white. Telson lobes obscure ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 10–15 , tel). Other characters as described for the genus. Third coxae flasks ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 10–15 , cf) short, reaching only to fourth coxae when reflexed posteriorly.
Gonopods ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 10–15 , 58, 59 View FIGURES 56–62 ) small, compact. In lateral view, coxa ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56–62 , cx) with about 6 or 7 setae. Coxal process broad, with deep, semicircular apical notch separating a curved, narrow anterior part from more broad, less curved posterior part. Anterior angiocoxite sharply deflexed ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 10–15 , 58, 59 View FIGURES 56–62 , aac), with two branches. Posterior angiocoxite in lateral view ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56–62 , pac) with two branches, one of which sheaths a thick, blunt, short, gently curved flagellocoxite ( Fig 58 View FIGURES 56–62 , fc). Colpocoxite ( Figs 58, 59 View FIGURES 56–62 , cc) shifted anteriomesally, with anterior branch densely fimbriate, posterior part swollen, with a few small, fine triangular fimbriae. Ninth legs ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 56–62 ) with lateral coxosternal processes ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 56–62 , cp) broad at bases, with two branches, mesal branch hamate, lateral branch slightly curved, acute; sternal part with median knob, telopodite fungiform ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 10–15 , 60 View FIGURES 56–62 , t 9 View FIGURES 7–9 ), bearing mesal process set with 6 or 7 ensiform setae (these setae appear socketed in SEM view.
Tenth leg coxae slightly enlarged, with glandular openings.
Females not collected.
Distribution: Presently known only from Butte County, California.
FMNH |
Field Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Striarioidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Striariinae |
Genus |