Berinda hoerwegi, Zamani & Chatzaki & Esyunin & Marusik, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.751.1381 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D27EA41-2396-463A-B1B2-0CCF79C9F3D2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4906454 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C322064D-4C9C-4FE5-A6AE-1403E560CA55 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C322064D-4C9C-4FE5-A6AE-1403E560CA55 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Berinda hoerwegi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Berinda hoerwegi View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C322064D-4C9C-4FE5-A6AE-1403E560CA55
Fig. 2 View Fig
Diagnosis
Males of this species differ from all congeners by the tibial apophysis being rectangular with a blunt end (vs with tapering tip) and by the distinct form of the median apophysis (= conductor sensu Panayiotou et al. 2010), with the sclerotized part directed terminally (vs laterally in B. aegilia Chatzaki, 2002 and B. amabilis Roewer, 1928 or hook-like in B. ensigera (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1874) , B. cooki Logunov, 2012 , B. cypria Chatzaki & Panayiotou, 2010 and B. hakani Chatzaki & Seyyar, 2010 ). Females of B. hoerwegi sp. nov. are mostly similar to those of B. aegilia but can be distinguished by the smaller conical anterior hood (Ah) (vs rectangular) and longer copulatory ducts.
Etymology
This species is named after Mr Christoph Hörweg, the curator of Arachnology at NHMW, for helping the first author during his visit to Vienna.
Type material
Holotype
IRAN • ♂; Ilam Province, Abdanan ; 32°53′ N, 47°30′ E; Jul. 2015; A. Zamani leg.; MHNG. GoogleMaps
Paratypes
IRAN • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; MHNG GoogleMaps • 8 ♂♂; Kermanshah Province, Zarrin Joob Vil. ; Apr. 2017; M. Amiri leg.; MHNG • 1 ♀; Kurdistan Province, Marivan ; May 2017; A. Zamani leg.; MHNG • 1 ♂; Fars Province, 5 km N of Persepolis; 1970; K. Bilek leg.; NHMW .
Description
Male (holotype) Habitus as in Fig. 2A View Fig . Total length 4.50. Carapace 1.92 long, 1.50 wide. Eye sizes and interdistance of PMEs: AME = 0.09, ALE = 0.12, PME = 0.12, PLE = 0.12, PME–PME = 0.03. Carapace, chelicerae, sternum, maxillae and labium light reddish brown. Chelicera with 2 pro- and 5 retromarginal teeth. Legs slightly lighter than carapace, without annulations, and with numerous spines (III and IV).Abdomen light brown, without any markings and with a small scutum anteriorly. Spinnerets light gray. Measurements of legs: I: 7.29 (1.77, 1.33, 1.66, 1.50, 1.03), II: 5.35 (1.41, 0.87, 1.13, 1.08, 0.86), III: 4.41 (1.19, 0.68, 0.82, 1.01, 0.71), IV: 7.07 (1.81, 1.06, 1.67, 1.71, 0.82).
Palp as in Fig. 2B–G View Fig . Femur unmodified; patella slightly longer than tibia (not including apophysis); tibial apophysis as long as tibia, with swollen base and flat anterior part, margins parallel; cymbium 2 times as long as wide, its width as long as tibia; spermophor coiled; median apophysis (= conductor sensu Panayiotou at al. 2010) large, sharply pointed; filamentous embolus originates almost from the center of the bulb, makes 360° loop.
Female (paratype from Ilam Province)
Carapace 3.05 long, 2.28 wide (abdomen missing). Eye sizes and interdistance of PMEs: AME = 0.13, ALE = 0.15, PME = 0.13, PLE = 0.12, PME–PME = 0.05. Coloration and habitus features as in male. Measurements of legs: I: 8.79 (2.30, 1.73, 1.86, 1.69, 1.21), II: 6.99 (1.92, 1.26, 1.55, 1.34, 0.92), III: 4.41 (1.19, 0.68, 0.82, 1.01, 0.71), IV: 6.04 (1.65, 1.00, 1.12, 1.39, 0.88).
Epigyne as in Fig. 2H–L View Fig . Epigyne with small, conical anterior hood, and lateral plates with copulatory openings located posteriorly in relation to the hood; copulatory ducts long, extending to the edges of the epigynal plate with two full coils, continuing posteriorly to two small, oval spermathecae.
Distribution
Known from the listed localities in Ilam, Kermanshah, Kurdistan and Fars Provinces, western and southcentral Iran.
NHMW |
Austria, Wien, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien |
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |