Pheropsophus sobrinus (Dejean, 1826)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4608.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3540218C-34FA-4D91-925A-3E89C6C3A7C1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4335063 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB8782-FFE8-774C-4AFE-FEDC30FCFF55 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pheropsophus sobrinus |
status |
|
Pheropsophus sobrinus View in CoL ( DEJEAN, 1826)
( Fig. 3 F, 3 G, 3 H View FIGURE 3 , 5 G View FIGURE 5 )
= Pheropsophus desbordesi MAINDRON, 1899 View in CoL
Brachinus sobrinus Dejean, 1826: 462 View in CoL ; Chaudoir, 1876: 25; Arrow, 1901: 202; Andrewes, 1930: 273; Felix et al. 2012: 77; Hrdlička, 2017: 480; Ullah et al. 2017: 180.
Pheropsophus desbordesi Maindron, 1899: 16 View in CoL ; 1905: 95; Arrow, 1901: 202; Bedel, 1914: 310; Andrewes, 1930: 273.
Specimens examined (n= 83): Holotype (by monotypy). labelled “in India Orient, Ex. Musaeo Chaudoir D. Dupont, sobrinus” in MNHN.
Other specimens examined: 3 exs., India: Bengal , Coll. Lamarc Piqot ; 1 ex., India: Pondicherry ; 2 exs. India: Madras ; 1 ex. India: Calcutta , Coll. Thieme ; 2 exs. India: Calcutta ; 1 ex., India: S. Indien: Coimbatore , 1400 ft. XII.69, Coll. P.S. Nathan ; 1 ex. India: Pondicherry ; 22 exs. India: South India: Pondicherry: Karikal, Coll. P.S. Nathan ; 2 exs. India: South India: Tamil Nadu: Coimbatore , 1400 Ft., coll. P.S. Nathan ; 1 ex., India: South India: Anamalai Hills: Cinchona , 3500 Ft., Coll. P.S. Nathan ; 2 exs. India: S. Indien: Coimbatore , 1400 ft., IV.68, Coll. P.S. Nathan ; 1 ex., India: Tamil Nadu: Tranquebar (now Tharangambadi), V.1951, Coll. H. Korge ; 44 exs. India: Coimbatore: TNAU ; 1 ex., India: Kerala: Palakkad, Hand picking, 27.XII.2016, coll. M.Divya ; 2 exs., India: Kerala: Palakkad, Hand picking, 26.XI.2017, coll. M. Divya.
Description. Length: 15.8 mm; TW: 6.8 mm
Colour: Head, pronotum, humeral spots, elytral median transverse bands, elytral apical band, femur, tibia, reddish yellow; antennal segments 1, 3, 4 with middle reddish yellow and anterior and posterior margin reddish brown, segments 2, 5–11 entirely reddish brown; elytra black; legs with apex of femur with small black spot; underside of head and thorax (including prosternum) entirely reddish yellow; mesosternum and metasternum reddish brown.
Head: Small, stout, smooth, pentagonal; eyes protruding.
Pronotum: Square shaped, anterior and posterior margins straight, lateral margin with apical 2/3 rd convex, basal 1/3 rd straight; disc glabrous with deep puncture marks in basal part, median furrow shallow; lateral beads present, but not prominent.
Elytra: Rectangular, lateral margins subparallel, basal margin straight, humerus pronounced, apical margin straight truncate; humeral spot small, median transverse band broad and rounded with serrated edges, reddish yellow apical band wide, broad, a reddish yellow line running along the lateral sides of the elytra connecting the median transverse band and apical band; striations narrow, intervals flat, broad.
Geographical distribution. INDIA: Tamil Nadu: Coimbatore, Tharangambadi, Anaimalai hills ( Andrewes 1930); Pondicherry: Karaikal ( Andrewes 1930); Kerala: Palakkad (New record); Bengal: Kolkata ( Andrewes 1930); Arunachal Pradesh ( Hrdlička 2017); Himachal Pradesh ( Hrdlička 2017); Kashmir ( Hrdlička 2017); Bengal: Darjil- ing ( Hrdlička 2017); Uttarakhand ( Hrdlička 2017); PAKISTAN: Rawalpindi. Chakwal. Poonch ( Ullah et al. 2017); NEPAL ( Felix et al. 2012); SRI LANKA ( Felix et al. 2012); TAIWAN ( Felix et al. 2012); BHUTAN ( Felix et al. 2012); YEMEN ( Andrewes 1930).
Remarks. Pheropsophus sobrinus is closely related to P. bimaculatus but differs by its smaller size, narrower elytra and pronotum, head without black spot, humeral spot very small and wide elytral apical spot.
The specimen based on which Pheropsophus sobrinus was described by Dejean (1826) has pronotum completely reddish yellow ( Fig. 3 F View FIGURE 3 ). Specimens with middle of pronotum reddish yellow and anterior and posterior margin black ( Fig. 3 H View FIGURE 3 ) are also frequent among P. sobrinus ( Felix et al. 2012) . However, the variants of P. sobrinus could be misidentified as P. hilaris when the brief type description of Fabricius (1798) alone is considered without comparing with the type specimen of P. hilaris (refer the remarks of P.hilaris and misplacement of type specimens). This error might have lead Chaudoir (1876) to synonymise P. sobrinus with P. hilaris . It is this variant character seen in P. sobrinus along with the non-availability and misplacement of the type series of P. hilaris that caused subsequent workers ( Arrow 1901, Andrewes 1921a, Felix et al. 2012, Ullah et al. 2017) to misidentify P. sobrinus as a variant subspecies of P. hilaris ( Fabricius 1798) . Comparison of the tracked down type series of P.hilaris at ZMUK (in Fabricius Collection) with the type of P. sobrinus showed that P. sobrinus is entirely different from P. hilaris in having completely reddish yellow head, rectangular, reddish yellow pronontal marking covering the lateral margins, convex pronotal disc, narrower and subparallel elytra with prominent squared humerus, very minute humeral spot (absent in many cases) and broad, yellow elytral apical band. Hence the species status of P. sobrinus ( Dejean 1826) is reinstated.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pheropsophus sobrinus
Venugopal, Akhil S. & Thomas, Sabu K. 2019 |
Pheropsophus desbordesi Maindron, 1899: 16
Andrewes, H. E. 1930: 273 |
Bedel, L. 1914: 310 |
Maindron, M. 1905: 95 |
Arrow, G. J. 1901: 202 |
Maindron, M. 1899: 16 |
Brachinus sobrinus
Hrdlicka, J. 2017: 480 |
Ullah, M. & Naeem, M. & Mahmood, K. & Rafi, M. A. 2017: 180 |
Felix, R. F. F. L. & Farkac, J. & Suleiman, A. S. 2012: 77 |
Andrewes, H. E. 1930: 273 |
Arrow, G. J. 1901: 202 |
Chaudoir, M. 1876: 25 |
Dejean, P. F. M. A. 1826: 462 |