Brueelia pofadderensis, Gustafsson & Zou & Oslejskova & Najer & Sychra, 2019
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.507 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:39A9499C-7551-4821-9C1D-4FA3BA0AD533 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5628138 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/374AAEBC-FB7D-455F-86A9-D3BC2360AD78 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:374AAEBC-FB7D-455F-86A9-D3BC2360AD78 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Brueelia pofadderensis |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Brueelia pofadderensis sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:374AAEBC-FB7D-455F-86A9-D3BC2360AD78
Figs 2–8 View Figs 2–3 View Figs 4–8 , 37–38 View Figs 37–44
Type host
Passer melanurus damarensis Reichenow, 1902 – Cape sparrow ( Passeridae ).
Type locality
Pofadder, Cape Province, South Africa.
Other hosts
Passer melanurus vicinus Clancey, 1958 .
Diagnosis
Brueelia pofadderensis sp. nov. is a fairly typical species of Brueelia from hosts in the genus Passer Brisson, 1760 . This informal group of Brueelia parasitizing Passer spp. is characterized by long, slender heads with convex lateral margins of the preantennal area, elongated parameres and the presence of aps but not psps on the male tergopleurite V. We have seen several undescribed species of this group (D.R. Gustafsson and S.E. Bush, in prep.), but the only described species in this group is Brueelia cyclothorax (Burmeister, 1838) (including N. subtilis Nitzsch in Giebel, 1874 and B. obligata Eichler, 1954 ). No adequate illustrations or descriptions of B. cyclothorax have been published, but partial illustrations were published by Eichler (1954) and Złotorzycka (1964, 1977). Note that the illustration in Eichler (1954) of the female abdomen mixes dorsal and ventral setae and characters on the same side. The frons in his illustrations are also incorrectly illustrated, as the hyaline margin has collapsed in his specimens.
Brueelia pofadderensis sp. nov. can be separated from B. cyclothorax by the following characters: abdominal segment III in both sexes without ps in B. pofadderensis sp. nov. ( Figs 2–3 View Figs 2–3 ), but with 1 ps on each side in B. cyclothorax ; male tergopleurite IV without aps in B. pofadderensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 2 View Figs 2–3 ), but with aps in B cyclothorax ; antero-lateral corners of mesosomal lobes blunt in B. pofadderensis sp. nov. ( Figs 5–6 View Figs 4–8 ), but acute in B. cyclothorax ; distal section of mesosome almost square-shaped in B. pofadderensis sp. nov. ( Figs 5–6 View Figs 4–8 ), but with more convergent lateral margins in B. cyclothorax ; parameres more elongated in B. cyclothorax than in B. pofadderensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 7 View Figs 4–8 ).
Etymology
The specific epithet is derived from the type locality.
Material examined
Holotype SOUTH AFRICA • ♂, ex Passer melanurus damarensis ; Cape Province, Pofadder ; May 1949; R. Meinertzhagen leg.; NHML 19050 View Materials .
Paratypes
SOUTH AFRICA • 3 ♂♂; same data as for holotype; NHML 19050 View Materials .
UNKNOWN COUNTRY • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, ex Passer melanurus demarensis ; locality unknown; Mar. 1913; J. Waterston Collection, formerly South Africa Museum; British Museum; NHML 1930-232 View Materials .
Other material
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, ex Passer melanurus vicinus ; West Transvaal , Potchefstroom; May 1953; British Museum; NHML 1955-660 View Materials • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, ex Passer melanurus vicinus ; Transvaal , Ventersdorf; 12 Jul. 1954; H.E. Paterson leg.; British Museum; NHML 1955-660 View Materials .
Description
Head slenderly rounded, dome-shaped ( Fig. 4 View Figs 4–8 ), lateral margins of preantennal area convex, frons slightly convex. Marginal carina narrow, with shallowly undulating median margins, displaced and widened at osculum. Ventral anterior plate large, with flat to shallowly concave anterior margin. Head chaetotaxy and pigmentation patterns as in Fig. 4 View Figs 4–8 ; head sensilla and pts not visible in examined specimens. Pre- and postocular nodi of similar size. Marginal temporal carina slender, with undulating median margin. Gular plate broad, lanceolate. Thoracic and abdominal segments and pigmentation patterns as in Figs 2–3 View Figs 2–3 , 37–38 View Figs 37–44 .
Male
Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 2; 1–2 View Figs 2–3 View Fig tps on tergopleurite VI. Basal apodeme broad, with shallowly concave lateral margins ( Fig. 5 View Figs 4–8 ). Proximal mesosome broadly trapezoidal, widening slightly distally ( Fig. 6 View Figs 4–8 ). Mesosomal lobes wide, angular, with extensive rugose area along distal margin. Gonopore oval, slightly longer than wide. Penile arms reach beyond distal margin of mesosome. Parameres slender, elongated distally ( Fig. 7 View Figs 4–8 ); pst1–2 as in Fig. 7 View Figs 4–8 . Measurements ex P. m. damarensis (n = 5): TL = 1.30–1.40; HL = 0.34–0.35; HW = 0.26–0.27; PRW = 0.16–0.18; PTW = 0.27; AW = 0.35–0.38. Measurements ex P. m. vicinus (n = 3): TL = 1.39–1.51; HL = 0.34–0.36; HW = 0.26–0.30; PRW = 0.16–0.19; PTW = 0.27–0.31; AW = 0.36–0.41.
Female
Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 3 View Figs 2–3 . Subgenital plate rounded trapezoidal, with moderately wide connection to cross piece ( Fig. 8 View Figs 4–8 ). Vulval margin convergent to rounded median point, in specimen from type host subspecies with 2–3 short, slender vms and 3 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 3 short, slender vos on each side of subgenital plate; distal 1 vos median to vss. In material from P. m. vicinus, with 4 short, slender vms and 3–5 short, thorn-like vss on each side of vulval margin, and 2–3 short, slender vos on each side of subgenital plate, with distal 1 vos situated median to vss. Measurements ex P. m. damarensis (n = 1): TL = 1.66; HL = 0.40; HW = 0.30; PRW = 0.20; PTW = 0.31; AW = 0.46. Measurements ex P. m. vicinus (n = 2): TL = 1.69–1.81; HL = 0.37–0.40; HW = 0.29–0.34; PRW = 0.17–0.21; PTW = 0.29–0.33; AW = 0.40–0.47.
Remarks
Specimens from the Transvaal host subspecies, Passer melanurus vicinus , differ from the specimens from the type host subspecies by having proportionately shorter and more rounded preantennal heads, in size and in the female genital chaetotaxy; the latter character may be different only due to the small number of specimens examined. The male genitalia and abdominal chaetotaxy are essentially similar between the two populations. We presently do not consider these differences substantial enough to warrant the erection of a new taxon for the specimens from Transvaal, but note that in some other cases, different host subspecies are parasitized by different species of Brueelia (D.R. Gustafsson and S.E. Bush, in prep.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.