Endressistemon sp. 3
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.016 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7535337 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD87F2-FFD7-FFC4-FBBB-FF08C7CBFC57 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Endressistemon sp. 3 |
status |
|
Text-fig. 29e–g View Text-fig
Description and remarks. The material comprises a single stamen from which the stamen base is missing. The anthers are basifixed, tetrasporangiate and dithecate ( Text-fig. 29e View Text-fig ). The stamens are up to about 0.7 mm long, including the apical projection, and about 0.3 mm broad over the anther. Apically the stamen has a prominent, coriaceous projection that is peltate to wing-like ( Text-fig. 29e View Text-fig ). Dehiscence is longitudinal and the anther wall is rolled back indicating valvate dehiscence ( Text-fig. 29e View Text-fig ).
Pollen grains in situ are monocolpate, semitectatereticulate, circular in equatorial view, 13 µm in diameter, with a homobrochate reticulum ( Text-fig. 29f, g View Text-fig ). The grains are folded and the extent of the aperture is not fully exposed.
Affinity and other occurrences. The stamen is similar to stamens of some extant Annonaceae (see comments on Endressistemon above), but also to the individual stamens of Endressistemon cateficensis and it is possible that it was originally part of a similar staminate structure. The pollen grains in situ are also similar to those of Endressistemon cateficensis , but are larger and the two taxa are probably not conspecific.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |