Endressistemon sp. 1

Friis, Else Marie, Crane, Peter R., Pedersen, Kaj Raunsgaard, Mendes, Mário Miguel & Kvaček, Jiří, 2022, The Early Cretaceous Mesofossil Flora Of Catefica, Portugal: Angiosperms, Fossil Imprint 78 (2), pp. 341-424 : 383

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.016

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7535333

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD87F2-FFD7-FFC4-FE85-FD72C148FA0B

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Endressistemon sp. 1
status

 

cf. Endressistemon sp. 1

Text-fig. 29a, b View Text-fig

D e s c r i p t i o n a n d r e m a r k s. The material includes a pair of compressed stamens resembling the staminate structures of Endressistemon cateficensis described above.The stamens are up to 0.8 mm long including the apical projection, and about 0.3 mm broad. The apical projection is longer than the thecae, about 0.45 mm long, and tapers to a long, pointed tip ( Text-fig. 29a View Text-fig ). The two stamens adhere together closely, but their bases are missing, and whether the stamens had separate distinct bases or a shared base, or whether the base was lost during fossilization, is not known. Anther dehiscence is longitudinal.

Pollen grains observed in situ ( Text-fig. 29b View Text-fig ) are monocolpate, semitectate-reticulate, circular in equatorial view, about 9 µm in diameter. The aperture is long, reaching almost to the equator, and the aperture margin is distinct. The reticulum is homobrochate ( Text-fig. 29b View Text-fig ).

A f f i n i t y a n d o t h e r o c c u r r e n c e s. The stamens and in situ pollen are closely similar to those of Endressistemon cateficensis described above, but the pollen sacs are more rounded and the apical projection is much longer. Because of the missing stamen base it is uncertain whether the two taxa are closely related.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF