Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007

Ohtsuchi, Naoya & Kawamura, Tomohiko, 2016, Redescription of Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Leucosiidae) new to Japan; with notes on the male characters of A. latusoides (Sakai, 1937), Zootaxa 4111 (1), pp. 41-52 : 42-49

Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007

[New Japanese name: Fuka-mizo-karuishi-kobushi] ( Figs. 1–4 )

Alox somphos— Marumura & Kosaka, 2003: 26 [not A. somphos Tan & Ng, 1995 ]

Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007: 80 –81, figs. 1B, 5H, I [type locality: Momo Beach, Panglao, Philippines].

Material examined. Holotype: NMCR No. 29900, male (CL 6.8 mm), station M7, Mono Beach, Panglao, 09°36.1’N 123°45.2’E, 0–3 m, reef platform with seagrass, 1 June 2004 (photographs).

Additional material: WMNH-Na-Cr 0 163, 1 female (8.9 × 12.1 mm), Nakagusuku Bay, Okinawa Island, 9 April 1993, coll. S. Nagai (examined by Marumura & Kosaka 2003).—RUMF-ZC-2942, 1 male (6.6 × 8.6 mm), 2 females (11.3 × 15.4, 10.6 × 14.1 mm), Minatogawa, Urasoe City, Okinawa I., 9 September 2010, coll. T. Maenosono.—RUMF-ZC-2946, 1 male (5.9 × 7.8 mm), same locality, 22 January 2011, coll. T. Maenosono.—RUMF-ZC-2943, 1 male (5.9 × 7.5 mm), Kaichu Doro, Uruma City, Okinawa I., 4 March 2011, coll. T. Maenosono.—RUMF-ZC-2945, 3 females (6.2 × 7.9–9.4 × 12.7 mm), same locality, 13 December 2008, coll. T. Maenosono.—RUMF-ZC-2944, 1 male (8.1 × 10.3 mm), Awase, Okinawa City, Okinawa I., 15 March 2010, coll. T. Maenosono.—NSMT-Cr 24069, 1 male (8.2 × 11.0 mm), 1 ovigerous female (8.1 × 11.2 mm), Nagura Bay, Ishigaki I., 0.5 m, coral gravels, 5 July 2011, by hand, coll. N. Ohtsuchi.—CBM-ZC 13077, 1 male (7.8 × 9.9 mm), 1 female (7.4 × 9.8 mm), same locality, 10 April 2013, by hand, coll. K. Nakamoto.—RUMF-ZC- 3745, 2 females (9.4 × 12.6, 9.2 × 12.4 mm), same data.—NSMT-Cr 24070, 3 females (7.6 × 10.0–8.6 × 11.0 mm), 11 April 2013, same locality, by hand, coll. K. Nakamoto.—RUMF-ZC-3746, 1 male (3.1 × 3.8 mm), same locality, 23 July 2013, by hand, coll. K. Nakamoto.—NSMT-Cr 24071, 1 male (3.3 × 4.4 mm), 1 female (2.3 × 3.0 mm), 1 ovigerous female (9.2 × 12.5 mm), same data.—NSMT-Cr 24072, 1 male (5.3 × 6.8 mm), 1 female (10.9 × 14.1 mm), same locality, 18 October 2013, by hand, coll. K. Nakamoto.—NSMT-Cr 24073, 1 male (7.2 × 8.9 mm), same data.—NSMT-Cr 24074, 1 female (5.5 × 7.3 mm), same data.—CBM-ZC 13078, 1 female (14.3 × 15.6 mm), same data.—NSMT-Cr 24075, 1 male (3.8 × 4.9 mm), 31 October 2013, same locality, by hand, coll. K. Nakamoto.—CBM-ZC 13079, 1 male (10.0 × 13.5 mm), 16 April 2014, same locality, by hand, coll. J. Hayakawa.—CBM-ZC 7080, 1 male (8.3 × 10.8 mm), grass beds, subtidal, Uehara Beach, Iriomote I., Yaeyama Is., 8 July 2001, dip net, coll. T. Komai.

Comparative material. Alox rugosum (Stimpson, 1858) : WMNH-Na-Cr 0 161, 1 female (8.1 × 11.6 mm), Nakagusuku Bay, Okinawa I., 10 m, 27 March 1991, coll. Kubo (dried specimen).—RUMF-ZC-3743, 1 male (6.4 × 9.2 mm), Sunabe, Chatan-cho, Nakagami-gun, Okinawa I., 3 m, 24 May 2014, SCUBA, coll. R. Yoshoda.—RUMF-ZC-3744, 1 female (4.8 × 6.7 mm), same data.—CBM-ZC 3999, 1 male (7.2 × 10.2 mm), coral sand, 15–20 m, south of Philippines, 9 May 1997, dredge, coll. T. Komai.— Alox uru Naruse & Ng, 2006 : CBM-ZC 8906, holotype male (4.4 × 5.8 mm), off Minami-Ukibaru I., Nakagusuku Bay, Ryukyu Is., 26°18.966’N, 127°58.460’E, 3 m, coll. T. Naruse & Y. Matsuno, SCUBA and dredging, 20 December 2005.

Redescription on basis of specimens from Japan. Carapace (Figs. 2A, D, 3A) subpentagonal, divergent posteriorly, expanded laterally, 1.3 broader than length (mean CL/CW = 1.3±0.0, N = 31); surface densely covered with mushroom-like tubercles, irregularly pitted. Frontal region produced anteriorly, divided into 2 rounded lobes, with elongate cavity apically, upturned in frontal view (Figs. 2C, F, 3A). Postfrontal protuberance wide, sometimes demarcated from median keel (Figs. 2A, D, 3A). Median keel distinct, generally Y-shaped, weakly broadened posteriorly, forming straight longitudinal ridge which reaches midway to cardiac region, not demarcated from cardiac region, with pair of nostril-like postfrontal cavity aside (Figs. 2A, C, 3A). Anterolateral region moderately eroded, with distinct groove on surface; groove parallel to anterolateral carapace borders, deep, granule-lined generally on floor, sigmoid in dorsal view; anterior half continuous to postfrontal cavity, distinctly narrowed near hepatic region; posterior half deep, moderately broad (Figs. 2A, D, 3A). Hepatic region convex due to median protuberance (Fig. 2A, D). Subhepatic margin with low, broad protuberance (triangular facet), barely visible in dorsal view (Figs. 2B, E, 3A). Hepatic, anterolateral margins divided by shallow convcavity. Anterolateral margin slightly sinuous, indistinctly rimmed, separated from posterolateral margin with shallow indentation. Branchiostegal region densely covered with small flattened tubercles (Fig. 2B, E). Branchial regions moderately inflated, with 2 low nodules obliquely from anterior slope to summit, separated from posterior posterolateral margin by narrow or nearly closed groove (Figs. 2A, D, 3A). Posterolateral margin right-angled, rounded apically, nearly straight in anterior half, horizontal, bilobed in posterior half. Cardiac region low, covered with flattened tubercles indistinctly, separated from branchial, intestinal regions by deep, granule-lined groove of variable prominence (Figs. 2A, D, 3A, 4A). Intestinal region moderately elevated, granulate on surface. Posterior margin slightly convex, moderately rounded (Fig. 2A, B).

Basal antennular segment ( Fig. 3 B) opeculiform, occupying antennular fossa when closed; anterior margin of fossa raised, forming rim. Basal antennal segment narrow, occupying hiatus between rim of antennular cavity, orbital submargin. Orbits small, not inflated, lateral margin bisutured. Ocular peduncles sealed by orbit when retracted.

Third maxillipeds ( Fig. 3 C) densely covered with flattened granules; ischium trapezoidal, with blunt ridge diagonally, irregularly pitted mediolaterally; meri subtriangular, with deep median depression (Figs. 2C, F, 3C).

FIGURE. 2. Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007 . Male (A–C, 8.1 × 10.3 mm, RUMF-ZC-2944), Awase, Okinawa City, Okinawa Island, and female (D–F, 8.1 × 11.2 mm, NSMT-Cr 24069), Nagura Bay, Ishigaki Island; G, H, medium-sized specimens of male (G, 5.9 × 7.5 mm, RUMF-ZC-2943) and female (H, 6.2 × 7.9 mm, RUMF-ZC-2945), Kaichu Doro, Uruma City, Okinawa Island. A, D, dorsal view; B, E, G, H, ventral view; C, F, frontal view.

Chelipeds (Figs. 2, 3D, E, 4) stout, subequal in length and shape. Merus trigonal in cross section, densely covered with indistinct flattened tubercles; upper flexor margin irregularly tuberculate in distal half, dilated distally to form rounded lobe; upper extensor margin with 4 or 5 tubercles on distal half, distal two fused at base; lower flexor margin lined with low tubercles; flexor surface with large proximal tubercle, on crossing point of upper, lower flexor margins. Carpus densely granulate. Chela (Figs. 2B, E, 3D, E) stout, scoop-like when both fingers closed; palm eroded proximally, covered with indistinct flattened tubercles, irregularly pitted, distinct median depression on upper surface; dactylus longer than palm (DL/PL = 1.4±0.1, N = 12); immovable finger stout, overlapping dactylus at tip, inner surface with median cavity proximally, outer surface with two parallel transverse rows of small granules in between, upper row reaching half way to tip from proximal end, lower row reaching tip from proximal end, with median cavity proximally, ventrolateral margin with row of relatively distinct granules. Dactylus with broad median keels fringed with relatively distinct granules on both inner, outer surface.

Ambulatory legs (Figs. 2, 3F, 4) short; meri stout, densely covered with flattened granules, with row of large tubercles on proximal half to four-fifths of extensor margin, on upper, lower angle of flexor surface; carpi, propodi, dactyli densely covered with low, sometimes indistinct granules; granules on surface of dactyli, microscopic, subacute.

Male thoracic sternum ( Fig. 3 B) densely covered by mushroom-like tubercles of irregular sizes, moderately sunk medially, horizontal ridges interspaced with 3 deep, granule-lined grooves. In adult females with expanded abdomen, thoracic sternum densely covered by indistinct flattened tubercles on surface ( Figs. 3 E, 4B). Sternoabdominal cavity deep, reaching buccal cavity in both sexes ( Figs. 3 B, E, G, H, 4B).

Male abdomen (Figs. 2B, 3G) hastate, densely covered with mushroom-like tubercles of irregular sizes; first, second somites short; third to fifth somites fused; third, fourth somites eroded medially, elevated laterally; fifth somite eroded laterally, several mushroom-like tubercles on floors of eroded parts; sixth somite trapezoid, with small distinct concavity laterally; telson distinctly narrow, elongate, almost 3 times longer than basal width (TL/ TW = 3.1±0.2, N = 4), 3 times longer than sixth somite (TL/ SSL = 3.1±0.1, N = 4). In females, abdomen prominently domed, densely covered with large, rounded granules on surface, with broad median keel defined by shallow but distinct submedian furrows (Fig. 2E); telson relatively elongate, shorter than in male, with broad, shallow median depression (Figs. 2E, 4B).

G1 ( Fig. 3 J, K) stocky, slightly twisted in distal half, tapering; lateral surface with long setae subdistally; mesial surface without setae; tips obtuse, directing dorsally, without setae. G2 ( Fig. 3 L, M) slender, bent dorsally, one-third length of G1; tips dilated, spoon-like.

Ontogenetic morphological changes. Male telson is elongate, almost 3 times longer than its basal width and sixth somite length (TL/TW = 3.1±0.2, TL/ SSL = 3.1±0.1, N = 4) in larger specimens (CL = 7.2–8.2 mm, Figs. 2C, 3G); in medium-sized specimens (CL = 3.8–6.6 mm), it is less elongate, 2.5 times longer than the basal width (TL/ TW = 2.5±0.0, N = 5, Figs. 2G, 3H), and more than twice the length of the sixth somites (TL/ SSL = 2.1±0.1, N = 5); whereas it is short, 1.5 times longer than its basal width and sixth somite length in smaller ones (CL = 3.1, 3.3 mm, Fig. 3 I). In females, abdomen is prominently domed, and with short telson (TL/TW = 1.7±0.1, TL/ SSL = 0.8±0.1, N = 6, Figs. 2E, 4B) in larger specimens (CL 9.2–11.3 mm); in medium-sized specimens (CL 5.5–7.6 mm), it is flattened, and with elongate telson (TL/TW = 1.8±0.0, TL/ SSL = 1.3±0.0, N = 3, Fig. 2H); whereas it is generally subtriangular with triangular telson (TL/TW = 1.4, TL/ SSL = 1.2, N = 1) in a small specimen (CL 2.3 mm).

Variations. The numerous small pits on the dorsal carapace surface vary in prominence among individuals ( Figs. 1 A, 2A, D, 3A, 4A), but generally, are more coalesced in smaller specimens. Granule-lined grooves separating cardiac, branchial, and intestinal regions also vary in prominence ( Figs. 1 A, 2A, D, 3A, 4A).

Size. The largest male is 8.2 × 11.0 mm; the largest female is 14.3 × 15.6 mm; the smallest ovigerous female is 8.1 × 11.2 mm.

Color in life. Eggs dark purple or reddish brown in fresh samples ( Fig. 4 ) (see also Galil & Ng 2007: 81, figs. 1B).

Distribution. Okinawa, Ishigaki, and Iriomote Islands, Ryukyus, southwestern Japan; Panglao Island, Philippines ( Marumura & Kosaka 2003; Galil & Ng 2007; this study). The present records extend the distribution of this species northwards.

Habitat. Found on reef platforms or sandy bottoms mixed with dead coral gravel in seagrass meadows ( Cymodocea rotundata , C. serrulata , and Thalassia hemprichii in Ishigaki Island), or under dead corals at 0–3 m deep ( Galil & Ng 2007; this study).

Remarks. Male specimens from the Ryukyu Islands agree well with the original description and figures ( Galil & Ng 2007) and the re-examined holotype of Alox chaunos ( Fig. 1 : NMCR No. 29900). The male abdomen with the elongate telson in the specimens at hand are very similar to the shape of the sterno-abdominal cavity of the holotype male from Panglao, Philippines ( Fig. 1 B), warranting our treating them conspecific. With the series of adult males on hand, we can confirm Galil & Ng’s (2007) observation that the elongate male telson distinguishes A. chaunos from all other congeners for which the male telson had been described or illustrated (cf. Tan & Ng 1995; Naruse & Ng 2006; Galil & Ng 2007, 2009). However, the proportions of the telson do change ontogenetically as noted above, and cannot be used as a distinguishing character when specimens are subadult or small. Other distinguishing characters of A. chaunos from congeners are discussed below.

According to Galil & Ng (2007), Alox chaunos is close to A. rugosum and A. uru . Alox chaunos and A. rugosum share the moderately broad (CW/CL = 1.3), well-eroded carapace with indistinct frontal, anterolateral, and posterolateral rims, the deep cavity on the frontal summit, the distinct frontal and median keels forming Yshaped ridge, and the ambulatory legs bearing tubercles on flexor margin. However, these two species can be distinguished by the following characters: (1) carapace is divergent posteriorly in the large specimen of A. chaunos (Fig. 2A, D) but it is divergent anteriorly only in large specimens of A. rugosum ( Fig. 5 A, cf. Tan & Ng 1995: pls. 6D–F, 7); (2) grooves parallel to anterolateral carapace margins are deep in A. chaunos (Figs. 2A, 3A) whereas in A. rugosum , they are shallow in anterior half, and deep but nearly occupied by mushroom-like tubercles in posterior half ( Fig. 5 A, D, E); (3) anterior posterolateral margins are unarmed in A. chaunos (Figs. 2A, D, 3A), whereas they bear three triangular teeth on the anterolateral angle ( Fig. 5 A, D, cf. Tan & Ng 1995: fig. 12B); (4) subhepatic protuberance is broad, apically obtuse in A. chaunos (Fig. 2B, E, C, G), while in A. rugosum , it is narrow, acuminate and produced downwards (cf. Fig. 5 B, C, F; Tan & Ng 1995: fig. 12B); (5) immovable finger is distinctly broader than the movable finger even in large specimens of A. chaunos (PL/ChH 1.4±0.1, Figs. 3 D, 4B), but both fingers are slender in large specimens of A. rugosum (PL/ChH 1.6–1.7, Fig. 5 A, D, E; Tan & Ng 1995: fig. 12C, pls. 6D–F, 7). This character should be used with caution, however, because the proportional length of fingers change ontogenetically in the latter species ( Fig. 5 D, E); (6) G1 is relatively stouter, shorter, and more tapering in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 J, K) than in A. rugosum (cf. Tan & Ng 1995: fig. 12I); and (7) distal part of the G2 is spoon-like in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 L, M) whereas it is elongated and petaloid in A. rugosum (cf. Tan & Ng 1995: fig. 12J). The relatively more eroded lateral carapace region and more strongly produced intestinal region, cited as differences by Galil & Ng (2007), is not noticeable or too variable to be useful, and cannot effectively distinguish A. chaunos (Figs. 2A, 3A, D, 5A) from A. rugosum ( Fig. 6 ).

Alox chaunos and A. uru share the following characters: the posteriorly divergent carapace with indistinct anterolateral rims, and the broad, non-demarcated median keels forming Y-shaped ridge, the distinct median depression on the ischium of the third maxillipeds, and the scoop-like chelae with stout, immovable fingers. The following characters nevertheless distinguish them: (1) hepatic regions are more produced in A. chaunos (Figs. 2A, D, 3A) than in A. uru (cf. Naruse & Ng 2006: fig. 2b); (2) ischium of the third maxilliped has a distinct median depression on its surface in A. chaunos (Figs. 2B, E, 3C) but this is absent in A. uru (cf. Naruse & Ng 2006: fig. 2b); (3) merus of the ambulatory leg has a tuberculate posterior margin in A. chaunos ( Figs. 1 , 2, 3F, 4, cf. Galil & Ng 2007: fig. 1B) while in A. uru , they are densely covered with granules on upper surface (cf. Naruse & Ng 2006: figs. 1b, 2e); and (4) G1 is slender, tapering in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 J, K, cf. Galil & Ng 2007: fig. 5H, I) whereas it is subdistally dilated in A. uru (cf. Naruse & Ng 2006: fig. 2g, h). Direct comparisons on the basis of the present material shows that less protruded front and lower gastric region cited by Galil & Ng (2007) as distinguishing features cannot distinguish these two species (CW/CL = 1.3±0.0 in A. chaunos versus 1.32 in A. uru ).

Alox liklik Galil & Ng, 2015 , recently described based on an adult female specimen from Papua New Guinea, closely resembles A. chaunos . The original description of A. liklik cannot effectively differentiate these two species. On the basis of the figures and our material, however, we must note that the following characters can be useful to distinguish them: (1) branchial regions of carapace are strongly elevated roundly, with two blunt oblique ridges in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 D), while it is weakly elevated, with only one of the bifurcated ridges obliquely positioned in A. liklik (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: fig. 2C, G); (2) frontal region is entire, with the dorsal surface forming a Y-shaped ridge in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 D), whereas it is medially demarcated and elevated on the anterior part in A. liklik (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: fig. 2C, I); (3) protuberance on the subhepatic region is less produced in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 E) than in A. liklik (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: fig. 2D); (4) third maxilliped has a distinct median depression in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 F) but this is absent in A. liklik (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: figs. 6H, 8C); (5) immovable finger is twice as broad as the movable finger basally, with lower margin moderately concave in A. chaunos ( Figs. 3 F, 5B), while in A. liklik , the immovable finger is as broad as the movable finger, with the lower margin distinctly concave (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: figs. 6G, 8J); (6) merus of the cheliped is covered with subacute tubercles, more granular in A. chaunos ( Figs. 3 E, 5E) than in A. liklik (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: fig. 6G, H); and (7) female abdomen is densely covered by subacute tubercles, with a distinct median ridge defined by deep grooves on each side in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 E), whereas the surface is covered by flattened tubercles, with the median ridge defined by shallow grooves on each side in A. liklik (cf. Galil & Ng 2015: fig. 6G, H).

Re-examination of a female specimen of Alox somphos from Nakagusuku Bay, Okinawa Island, Ryukyus (WMNH-Na-Cr 0163: see Marumura & Kosaka 2003), which was the only record of this species from Japan, revealed that it should be referred to A. chaunos instead. Alox chaunos is distinguishable from A. somphos as follows: (1) carapace is posteriorly divergent, and its frontal region is more produced in A. chaunos (CL/CW = 1.3, Fig. 2A, D) than in A. somphos (CL/CW = 1.5, cf. Tan & Ng 1995: pl. 8A, D), (2) median keel is broad and fused with the cardiac region in A. chaunos (Fig. 2A, B) whereas it is narrow and very distinctly demarcated from the cardiac region in A. somphos (cf. Tan & Ng 1995: pl. 8A, D); (3) chelae are stout, with broad immovable finger as long as palm in A. chaunos ( Figs. 3 D, 4B), but they are slender, with narrow immovable fingers distinctly longer than palm in A. somphos (cf. Tan & Ng 1995: pl. 8A, D); and (4) G1 is straight and bearing setae on the lateral surface at the distal one-third in A. chaunos ( Fig. 3 J, K, cf. Galil & Ng 2007: fig. 5H, I) but it is narrowed in the distal one-third, weakly bent dorsally, and bearing setae dorsoventrally in A. somphos (cf. Galil & Ng 2007: fig. 5C–G). The distribution range of A. somphos otherwise includes Vietnam, Palau, Malacca Strait, Singapore, and Indonesia ( Tan & Ng 1995).

Figures

FIGURE 1. Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007. Holotype, male (CL 6.8 mm, NMCR No. 29900), Panglao, Philippines. A, dorsal view; B, ventral view. Photographs courtesy of M. R. Manuel-Santos (National Museum of the Philippines) and P. K. L. Ng (National University of Singapore).

FIGURE 3. Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007. Males (A – G, J – M, 7.2 × 8.9 mm, NSMT-Cr 24073; H, 3.8 × 4.9 mm, NSMT-Cr 24075; I, 3.3 × 4.4 mm, NSMT-Cr 24071), Nagura Bay, Ishigaki Island. A, carapace (dorsal view); B, anterior part of carapace, frontal view; C, right third maxilliped (outer surface); D, E, right cheliped, outer (D) and inner views (E); F, right fourth ambulatory legs; G – I, abdomens; J, K, left first gonopod in lateral (J) and mesial views (K); L, M, left second gonopods in mesial view (L), and its tip (M). Indistinct flattened tubercles were omitted in A – E. Scales = 2.0 mm for A, 1.0 mm for B – M.

FIGURE 4. Coloration in life of Alox chaunos Galil & Ng, 2007. Ovigerous female, (10.0 × 13.5 mm, CBM-ZC 13079) Nagura Bay, Ishigaki Island. A, dorsal view; B, ventral view.

FIGURE 5. Alox rugossum (Stimpson, 1858). A – C, male (RUMF-ZC- 3743, 6.4 × 9.2 mm), Sunabe, Okinawa Island, in dorsal (A), ventral (B), and frontal view (C); D, female (WMNH-Na-Cr 0 161, 8.1 × 11.6 mm), Nakagusuku Bay, Okinawa Island, in dorsal view; E, F, immature female (RUMF-ZC- 3744, 4.8 × 6.7 mm), Sunabe, Okinawa Island, in dorsal (E) and ventral view (F).

FIGURE 6. Alox latusoides (Sakai, 1937). Male (WMNH-Na-Cr 0 160, 5.5 × 7.2 mm), Kamiura, Kushimoto, Wakayama Prefecture. A, dorsal view; B, ventral view; C, frontal view; D, abdomen; E, F, left first gonopod in lateral (E) and mesial views (F); G, left second gonopods in mesial view. Scales = 1.0 mm.