Hoplistomerus caliginosus Wulp, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7667859 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B0-FFAF-FFCB-FE73-FF0DFD3BFB8B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hoplistomerus caliginosus Wulp, 1899 |
status |
|
Hoplistomerus caliginosus Wulp, 1899 View in CoL
Figs 5–7 View Figs 5–13
Hoplistomera caliginosa: Wulp 1899: 90 .
Hoplistomerus caliginosa: Hull 1962: 96 .
Hoplistomerus caliginosus: Oldroyd 1940: 314–315 View in CoL (fig. 5c ơ clasper); 1980: 350 (catalogue).
Diagnosis: Size: Moderate (wing length from humeral cross-vein to tip 8–11 mm). Head: Eye wider than face (in anterior view measured at level of greatest head width). Relative proportions of antennal segments (scape, pedicel and postpedicel) 1.0:0.7:? (i.e. scape somewhat longer than pedicel; postpedicel missing). Thorax: Presutural macroseta(e) absent. Anepisternal macroseta absent. Prosternal ventromedial setation short to absent. Male metatibial spur small. Scutellum with a transverse groove at midlength. Wing cell m 3 with microtrichia covering posterodistal half. Prothoracic coxa and prosternum both dark red-brown. Abdomen: T3 setulae entirely white (no golden setae evident). ơ genitalia as in Figs 5–7 View Figs 5–13 .
Type specimens studied: YEMEN: 1ơ lectotype, ‘Type. / v.d. Wulp, / Trans. Ent. Soc., / 1899, page 90, / pl. iii, fig. 2.’ [white with red border], ‘S.W. Arabia, / 15 miles N.W. of / Aden [12°50'N: 45°00'E], Lahej [Lahij, 13°03'N: 44°53'E] / Capt. Mar. 28.95 / & pres. 1899 by / J. W. Yerbury.’, ‘1899 / 7712’, ‘ Hoplistomera / caliginosa n.s.’, ‘Type Dip: 213 2/2 / Hoplistomera / caliginosa / v.d. Wulp / Hope Dept. Oxford’ (OXUM); 1ơ paralectotype, ‘Type. / v.d. Wulp, / Trans. Ent. Soc., / 1899, page 90, / pl. iii, fig. 2.’ [white with red border], ‘S.W. Arabia, / 19m. fr. Aden. / Haithalhim. [?] / Capt. Mar. 26.95 / & pres. 1899 by / J. W. Yerbury.’, ‘1899 / 7711’, ‘Type Dip: 2131/ 2 / Hoplistomera / caliginosa / v.d. Wulp / Hope Dept. Oxford’ (OXUM).
Notes: Wulp (1899) stated that his specimens were female, but Oldroyd (1940) reported that they were in fact males, a fact I can confirm.A holotype has never been designated and so Wulp’s specimens are considered syntypes. I here designate the ơ from ‘Lahej’ as lectotype, the other specimen being a paralectotype. Lahej [? Lahij] is therefore the type locality. While Oldroyd (1940) reports the presence of another male from Lahej in the BMNH, no other material is known.
Distribution and biology: Known only from Yemen. Both types were collected at the end of March (Table 1) more than a century ago.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hoplistomerus caliginosus Wulp, 1899
Londt, Jason G. H. 2007 |
Hoplistomerus caliginosa: Hull 1962: 96
HULL, F. M. 1962: 96 |
Hoplistomerus caliginosus:
OLDROYD, H. 1940: 315 |
Hoplistomera caliginosa:
WULP, F. M. VAN DER 1899: 90 |