Spermophora falcata, Yao, Zhiyuan & Li, Shuqiang, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3709.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:496843C1-1D75-4B55-BFF2-370ECBAC11BB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6158997 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87D2-FF97-FFC8-FF27-F9B513010D84 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Spermophora falcata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Spermophora falcata View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 38–41 View FIGURE 38 View FIGURE 39 View FIGURE 40 View FIGURE 41
Type material. Holotype: Male ( IZCAS), Sinopoda Cave [17°26.953′N, 104°52.518′E, alt. 150 m], 9.66 km north of Thakhek Town, Ban Kouanphavang Khammouane, Laos, 23 November 2012, leg. Z. Yao (Yao-LA 053– 056). Paratypes: 1 male and 2 females ( IZCAS), same data as holotype.
Etymology. The specific name is from Latin falcatus (sickle-shaped), in reference to the shape of serrated ventral flap of procursus; adjective.
Diagnosis. The species resembles S. kaindi ( Huber 2005b: 69, figs 10 and 69–71), but can be distinguished by presence of a long apophysis accompanying a serrated, sickle-shaped, ventral flap on procursus ( Figs 38 View FIGURE 38 A–D and 40A–B) and different distal elements of procursus ( Figs 38 View FIGURE 38 A–D and 40A–B).
Description. Male (holotype): Total length 1.46 (1.55 with clypeus), prosoma 0.59 long, 0.65 wide, opisthosoma 0.87 long, 0.62 wide. Leg I: – (3.04 + 0.25 + 3.20 + – + –), leg II: 8.54 (2.50 + 0.23 + 2.25 + 2.78 + 0.78), leg III: 6.52 (1.81 + 0.23 + 1.70 + 2.15 + 0.63), leg IV: 9.89 (2.88 + 0.26 + 2.75 + 3.36 + 0.64); tibia I L/d: 58. Habitus as in Fig. View FIGURE 39
39C. Dorsal shield of prosoma and sternum yellowish, without marks. Legs yellowish, without darker rings. Opisthosoma yellowish, without spots. Distance ALE-ALE 0.25, diameter ALE 0.03, AME, PLE and PME absent. Ocular area not elevated. Thoracic furrow absent. Sternum wider than long (0.50/0.43). Chelicerae as in Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 C, with a pair of small apophyses proximally and a pair of short apophyses distally (distance between tips: 0.12). Pedipalpi as in Figs 38 View FIGURE 38 A–B and 40A–B; trochanter with a short retrolatero-ventral apophysis; procursus simple proximally but complex distally, with a long apophysis accompanying a serrated, sickle-shaped, ventral flap; bulb with a large serrated apophysis provided with a hooked tip and a small apophysis, with a simple embolus. Retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia I at 8%; legs with short vertical hairs on tibiae and metatarsi, without spines and curved hairs.
Variation: Tibia I in another male: 2.72.
Female: Similar to male, habitus as in Figs 39 View FIGURE 39 D–E. Tibia I (n=2): 2.63, 2.80 (mean: 2.72). One of the specimens measured: Total length 1.66 (1.75 with clypeus), prosoma 0.59 long, 0.63 wide, opisthosoma 1.07 long, 0.75 wide; tibia I: 2.63. Distance ALE-ALE 0.17, diameter ALE 0.04, AME, PLE and PME absent. Epigynum ( Figs 39 View FIGURE 39 A and 40D) simple and flat externally, with dark internal shade, a pair of pockets 0.12 apart, and a posterior median pocket. Vulva ( Figs 39 View FIGURE 39 B and 40E) with a wavy arch anteriorly and a pair of bent pore plates. Tarsus I with about 6 distinct pseudosegments.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).
IZCAS |
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |