Belisana gigantea, Yao, Zhiyuan & Li, Shuqiang, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3709.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:496843C1-1D75-4B55-BFF2-370ECBAC11BB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6158969 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87D2-FFB5-FFF2-FF27-FCDF13010877 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Belisana gigantea |
status |
sp. nov. |
Belisana gigantea View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 7–9 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 , 41 View FIGURE 41
Type material. Holotype: Male ( IZCAS), underside of leaves [15°11.639′N, 106°06.222′E, alt. 909 m], Tad Etu, Champasak, Laos, 19 November 2012, leg. Z. Yao (Yao-LA 026–028). Paratype: 1 female ( IZCAS), same data as holotype.
Etymology. The specific name is from Latin giganteus (of giants, large), in reference to the large membranous flap of procursus; adjective.
Diagnosis. The species can be easily distinguished from all known congeners by large membranous flap ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 B, D and 9B) and different shape of vulva ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 B and 9E).
Description. Male (holotype): Total length 1.58 (1.72 with clypeus), prosoma 0.56 long, 0.60 wide, opisthosoma 1.02 long, 0.62 wide. Leg I: 13.39 (3.25 + 0.29 + 3.36 + 5.32 + 1.17), leg II: 8.96 (2.45 + 0.23 + 2.17 + 3.30 + 0.81), leg III: 5.53 (1.63 + 0.22 + 1.25 + 1.91 + 0.52), leg IV: – (2.27 + 0.23 + 1.81 + 2.66 + –); tibia I L/ d: 54. Habitus as in Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 E. Dorsal shield of prosoma and sternum whitish, without marks; clypeus with an apophysis forward. Legs yellowish, but dark brown on patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints, without darker rings. Opisthosoma yellowish, with spots dorsally. Distance PME-PME 0.13, diameter PME 0.08, distance PME-ALE 0.02, AME absent. Ocular area not elevated. Thoracic furrow absent. Sternum wider than long (0.45/0.41). Chelicerae as in Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 D and 9C, with a pair of thumb-shaped apophyses proximally provided with a small, round apophysis, and a pair of short, pointed apophyses distally (distance between tips: 0.06). Pedipalpi as in Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A–B and 9A–B; trochanter with a short retrolatero-ventral apophysis; femur with a dorsal apophysis; procursus simple proximally but complex distally, with a large membranous flap retrolaterally; bulb with a simple embolus. Retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia I at 13%; legs with short vertical hairs on metatarsi, without spines and curved hairs; tarsus I with about 10 distinct pseudosegments.
Variation: Unknown.
Female: Similar to male, habitus as in Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 F–G. Total length 1.75 (1.84 with clypeus), prosoma 0.60 long, 0.63 wide, opisthosoma 1.15 long, 0.78 wide; leg I lost. Distance PME-PME 0.13, diameter PME 0.07, distance PME-ALE 0.02, AME absent. Epigynum ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 A and 9D) simple and flat externally, protrudent posteriorly, with dark internal shade and a pair of pockets 4 Μm apart. Vulva ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 B and 9E) with a ridge-shaped arch anteriorly and a pair of elliptic pore plates.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).
IZCAS |
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.