Antimerina, BRUNKE, ZYLA & SOLODOVNIKOV, 2019

Brunke, Adam James, Żyła, Dagmara, Yamamoto, Shûhei & Solodovnikov, Alexey, 2019, Baltic amber Staphylinini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae): a rove beetle fauna on the eve of our modern climate, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 187, pp. 166-197 : 191

publication ID

052F372-FFB9-42C6-BAC9-0FF6360B5867

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:052F372-FFB9-42C6-BAC9-0FF6360B5867

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE9B3B-2E1C-E67C-FF21-F670FB52B550

treatment provided by

Plazi (2025-02-06 23:44:28, last updated by GgImagineBatch 2025-02-07 00:37:11)

scientific name

Antimerina
status

 

Antimerina View in CoL

The sister of Antimerus has never been recovered consistently in previous analyses ( Solodovnikov, 2006; Brunke & Solodovnikov, 2013; Brunke et al., 2016; Chani-Posse et al., 2018; Schillhammer & Brunke, 2018), although this genus was always outside the major Northern Hemisphere clade. For the first time, based on morphological and molecular data, Schillhammer & Brunke (2018) resolved a sister group for the genus with high support. Their topology suggested a sistergroup relationship with the Northern Hemisphere clade, which was supported morphologically by the presence of peg setae on the paramere in both clades. In the present analysis, the HAT clade + Northern Hemisphere clade or the Northern Hemisphere clade alone cannot be rejected as potential sister groups, because the node in question is weakly supported (PP = 0.70). Molecular data were available thus far for only one species of Antimerus , and the addition of further species might resolve its sister group, which is important for reconstructing the biogeographical history of Staphylinini . Regardless of the true sister of Antimerus , this taxon is consistently isolated in all previously recovered topologies and is morphologically incongruent with all existing higher taxa. Therefore, we suggest that a separate subtribe is needed for this distinct lineage of Staphylinini (see Systematic Palaeontology). We also confirm the results of Brunke & Solodovnikov (2013), who recovered a monophyletic Antimerus , albeit with different taxa.

Brunke AJ, Solodovnikov A. 2013. Alesiella gen. n. and a newly discovered relict lineage of Staphylinini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Systematic Entomology 38: 689-707.

Brunke AJ, Chatzimanolis S, Schillhammer H, Solodovnikov A. 2016. Early evolution of the hyperdiverse rove beetle tribe Staphylinini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae) and a revision of its higher classification. Cladistics 32: 427-451.

Chani-Posse M, Brunke A, Chatzimanolis S, Schillhammer H, Solodovnikov A. 2018. Phylogeny of the hyper-diverse rove beetle subtribe Philonthina with implications for classification of the tribe Staphylinini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Cladistics 34: 1-40.

Schillhammer H, Brunke AJ. 2018. Eureka: discovery of male Turgiditarsus Schillhammer reveals its placement in Acylophorina and resolves phylogenetic relationships within the subtribe (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae). Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 76: 303-322.

Solodovnikov AY. 2006. Revision and phylogenetic assessment of Afroquedius gen. nov. from South Africa: toward new concepts of the genus Quedius, subtribe Quediina and reclassification of the tribe Staphylinini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99: 1065-1084.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Carabidae