Entomolepididae Brady, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2715 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40ADB051-FC0A-4688-B722-37D0514BD2B2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14024793 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FEAF55-C72F-FFDA-DAFD-FAFE275E6709 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2024-10-30 16:44:47, last updated 2024-11-29 16:59:23) |
scientific name |
Entomolepididae Brady, 1899 |
status |
|
Key to the species of the family Entomolepididae Brady, 1899 View in CoL (adapted from Borges et al. (2021)
1. Pedigerous somite 3 and 4 fused ...................................................................................................... 2
– Pedigerous somites 3 and 4 not fused ............................................................................................... 8
2. Most of urosome exposed ................................................................................................................. 3
– Most of urosome hidden under body shield ..................................................................................... 4
3. Antennule 18-segmented with aesthetasc on segment 15, L 4 reduced to a knob .............................. ................................................................................................... Parmulella emarginata Stock, 1992
– Antennule 17-segmented with aesthetasc on segment 16, L 4 biramous with 3-segmented rami ........................................................................ Neoparmulella periperiensis Farias et al., 2020
4. P3 biramous ...................................................................................................................................... 5
– P3 uniramous ( Paralepeopsyllus Ummerkutty, 1960 ) ..................................................................... 6
5. P4 reduced to a knob and antennule 17-segmented ................. Parmulodes verrucosa Wilson, 1944
– P4 absent and antennule 16-segmented .................... Parmulopsyllus iamarinoi Borges et al., 2021
6. Antennule 15-segmented ................................................... Paralepeopsylllus leei Lee & Kim, 2017
– Antennule 14-segmented .................................................................................................................. 7
7. Third exopodal segment of P3 with 3 setae ...... Paralepeopsyllus mannarensis Ummerkutty, 1960
– Third exopodal segment of P3 with 4 spines and 3 setae ................................................................... .............................................................................. Paralepeopsyllus dambayensis Lee & Kim, 2017
8. P4 absent ( Entomolepis Brady, 1899 ) ............................................................................................... 9
– P4 present ........................................................................................................................................ 10
9. Caudal ramus 5–6× as long as wide ............................................... Entomolepis ovalis Brady, 1899
– Caudal ramus at least 10 × as long as wide ........................ Entomolepis hamondi McKinnon, 1988
10. P4 endopod reduced to a small segment ( Lepeopsyllus Thompson & Scott, 1903 ) ........................11
– P4 endopod absent .......................................................................................................................... 12
11. Female antennule 15-segmented .............................. Lepeopsyllus typicus Thompson & Scott, 1903
– Female antennule 13-segmented ................................ Lepeopsyllus ovalis Thompson & Scott, 1903
12. Three postgenital somites in female and four in male ( Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000 ) .............. 13
– Two postgenital somites in female and three in male ( Entomopsyllus McKinnon, 1988 ) ............. 19
13. Female antennule 14-segmented ................................. Spongiopsyllus atypicus Canário et al., 2019
– Female antennule with 15 or more segments ................................................................................. 14
14. Female antennule 15-segmente .................................. Spongiopsyllus redactus Canário et al., 2012
– Female antennule with 16 or more segments ................................................................................. 15
15. Female antennule 16-segmented ..................................................................................................... 16
– Female antennule 17-segmented ................................... Spongiopsyllus adventicius Johnsson, 2000
16. Maxillule inner lobe with 4 setae .................................................................................................... 17
– Maxillule inner lobe with at least 3 setae ....................................................................................... 18
17. Maxilliped endopod formula (2,1,1+claw) ..................................... Spongiopsyllus aramisi sp. nov.
– Maxilliped endopod formula (2,2,0+claw) .................................... Spongiopsyllus porthosi sp. nov.
18. Maxilliped endopod formula (2,1,1+claw), maxillule inner lobe with 3 setae ................................... ............................................................................................................ Spongiopsyllus athosi sp. nov.
– Maxilliped endopod formula (1,1,1+claw), maxillule inner lobe with 2 setae ................................... ................................................................................. Spongiopsyllus intermedius Borges et al. 2021
19. Endopod of P1 shorter than exopod ................................ Entomopsyllus nichollsi McKinnon, 1988
– Endopod of P1 shorter than exopod ................................................................................................ 20
20. Female antennule 15-segmented; third exopodal segment of P4 showing 2 setae ............................. ........................................................................................................ Entomopsyllus stocki Kim, 2004
– Female antennule with more than 16-segments; third exopodal segment of P4 showing 3 or more setae ................................................................................................................................................ 21
21. Female antennule 16-segmented; third exopodal segment of P4 showing 3 setae ............................. .................................................................................................. Entomopsyllus adriae (Eiselt, 1959)
– Female antennule 17-segmented; third exopodal segment of P4 showing 4 setae ............................. ............................................................................... Entomopsyllus brevicaudatus Lee & Kim, 2017
Borges C., Farias A., Macola R., Neves E. G. & Johnsson R. 2021. A new Entomolepididae genus and a new species of Spongiopsyllus associated with sponges in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 4981: 301 - 316. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4981.2.5
Brady G. S. 1899. On the marine Copepoda of New Zealand. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 15 (2): 31 - 54. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1899. tb 00018. x
Canario R., Neves E. G. & Johnsson R. 2012. Spongiopsyllus redactus, a new species of Entomolepididae (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) associated with a scleractinian coral in Brazil. Zoosymposia 8: 49 - 55. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zoosymposia. 8.1.8
Canario R., Hurbath T., Rocha C. E. F., Neves E. G. & Johnsson R. 2019. Redescription of Parmulodes verrucosus Wilson, 1944 with notes of Entomopsyllus stocki Kim, 2004 and description of a new species of Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Entomolepididae. Zootaxa 4612: 247 - 259. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4612.2.7
Farias A., Neves E. G. & Johnsson R. 2020. A new species and genus of Entomolepididae Brady, 1899 (Copepoda Siphonostomatoida) associated with the endemic octocoral Phyllogorgia dilatata (Esper, 1900) (Cnidaria, Octocorallia) from Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 54: 2367 - 2379. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2020.1845407
Johnsson R. 2000. Spongiopsyllus adventicius new species and genus of Entomolepididae (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with sponges in Brazil. Hydrobiologia 417: 115 - 119.
Lee J. M. & Kim I. H. 2017. Siphonostomatoid copepods (Crustacea) associated with sponges from the Philippines and Vietnam. Animal Systematics Evolution and Diversity 33 (2): 73 - 99. https: // doi. org / 10.5635 / ASED. 2017.33.2.007
McKinnon A. D. 1988. A revision of Entomolepididae (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) with descriptions of two new species from Australia, and comments on Entomolepis ovalis Brady. Invertebrate Systematics 2: 995 - 1012. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / IT 9880995
Stock J. H. 1992. Entomolepididae (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) from the Antilles. Studies on the Natural History of the Caribbean Region 71: 53 - 68.
Thompson I. C. & Scott A. 1903. Report on the Copepoda collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. In: Herdman W. A. (ed.) Report to the Government of Ceylon on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar 1, suppl. 7: 227 - 307. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 59334
Ummerkutty A. N. P. 1960. Studies on Indian copepods. 1. Paralepeopsyllus mannarensis, a new genus and species of cyclopoid copepod from the Gulf of Mannar. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 2 (1): 105 - 114.
Wilson C. B. 1944. Parasitic copepods in the United States National Museum. Procceedings of the United States National Museum 94: 529 - 582. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00963801.94 - 3177.529
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Copepoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |