Andrena (incertae sedis) tenebricorpus Wood, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.974.54794 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B888866-0F07-4DEC-AE7B-88DFB0A4621C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C1EA635-A7DD-418E-BC59-CF97AB02F508 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:6C1EA635-A7DD-418E-BC59-CF97AB02F508 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Andrena (incertae sedis) tenebricorpus Wood |
status |
sp. nov. |
Andrena (incertae sedis) tenebricorpus Wood sp. nov. Figures 63-66 View Figures 63–66
Material.
Holotype: Morocco: Guelmim-Oued Noun, 10 km E Guelmim, 15.iv.1995, 1♀, leg. Ma. Halada. Deposited in the OÖLM.
Diagnosis.
Andrena tenebricorpus is very similar to A. gafsensis and faces the same problems of subgeneric classification, and is therefore also not currently placed in one until molecular data are available. Both species have a flattened and shiny clypeus (Fig. 64 View Figures 63–66 ) and a short propodeum (Fig. 65 View Figures 63–66 ), but differ most obviously in colour, with A. tenebricorpus having dark brown terga (Fig. 66 View Figures 63–66 ) in strong contrast to the red terga of A. gafsensis . In terms of structural difference, in A. tenebricorpus the foveae are slightly wider, the hairs on the scutum and scutellum are relatively much shorter (compare Figs 57 View Figures 55–62 , 65 View Figures 63–66 ) at the same time that the hair bands on the apical margins of the tergites are relatively much thicker (compare Figs 58 View Figures 55–62 , 66 View Figures 63–66 ), suggesting that this is not as a result of abrasion, and the scopa are a dirty brown (Fig. 63 View Figures 63–66 ) rather than white (Fig. 55 View Figures 55–62 ).
In terms of overall colouration and appearance A. tenebricorpus is extremely similar to A. guichardi Warncke, 1980 (also found only in south-western Morocco) with the same dark to dark brownish tergal colouration with contrasting white hair bands (see Fig. 104 View Figures 99–104 ). However, A. tenebricorpus can be clearly separated by the flattened clypeus (domed in A. guichardi ), more densely punctate scutum (punctures separated by 1-2 puncture diameters, by 2-4 puncture diameters in A. guichardi , see Fig. 103 View Figures 99–104 ), and by the propodeal triangle which is weakly differentiated only by sculpturing (clearly marked by a small raised carina in A. guichardi ).
Description.
Female: Body length 10 mm (Fig. 63 View Figures 63–66 ). Head: Dark, as wide as long. Clypeus slightly arched laterally, broadly flattened on the disc, underlying surface laterally with shagreenation, the majority of disc shiny (Fig. 64 View Figures 63–66 ). Moderately punctured, punctures separated by 1-2 puncture diameters, with generally impunctate line in centre of clypeus. Process of labrum trapezoidal with faint lateral striations, fore margin weakly emarginate, slightly bulging. Gena equal to width of compound eye. Gena, face, and scape with white hairs, longest not exceeding length of the scape. Vertex with mixture of whitish and yellowish hairs of same length as on rest of face. Foveae of average width, occupying slightly more than half of distance between top of compound eye and lateral ocellus. Antennae dark, A4 apically and A5-12 lightened orange below, A3 equalling A4+5. Ocelloccipital distance equalling width of lateral ocellus. Mesosoma: Scutum and scutellum densely punctured, punctures separated by 1-1.5 puncture diameters, underlying surface of the scutum shagreened anteriorly, elsewhere and on the scutellum shiny. Episternum microreticulate, dull. Lateral faces of the propodeum shagreened, weakly shining. Hind face of propodeum microreticulate and weakly rugose, rugosity outlining the propodeal triangle which is itself rugose and therefore defined by the change in texture between rugosities (Fig. 65 View Figures 63–66 ). Scutum and scutellum with very short and fine hairs, scarcely longer than width of lateral ocellus. Episternum and propodeum with longer white hair, never exceeding length of the scape. Legs dark, tarsi brown, pubescence brown. Femoral scopa white, tibial scopa dirty brown. Wings hyaline, venation brown, stigma dark brown. Nervulus slightly antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergites dark brown throughout with exception of two lateral black spots on T2 (Fig. 66 View Figures 63–66 ). Tergites densely, finely, and evenly punctured, punctures separated by one puncture diameter. T2-4 with dense white hair bands that obscure underlying surface, on T2 interrupted medially, on T3-4 complete. T5-6 with thick brown hairs flanking pygidial plate, with a few white hairs laterally. Pygidial plate with slightly raised margin, centrally flat.
Male. Unknown.
Distribution.
South-western Morocco (Fig. 145b View Figure 145 ).
Floral preferences.
None recorded.
Remarks.
Whilst A. tenebricorpus is structurally very similar to A. gafsensis , the subtle morphological differences suggest that A. tenebricorpus is distinct. Moreover, the Souss valley to the Guelmim region is bio-climatically quite distinct to the deserts of southern Tunisia and hosts many unique bee species within Morocco itself, further suggesting a distinct specific identity.
Etymology.
The name tenebricorpus from tenebris (dark) + corpus (body) was chosen because of the structural similarities between A. tenebricorpus and A. gafsensis , but without the same reddish colouration.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |