Biphallapodema oligodentata, Papp, László, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3764.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:707FAA19-12B5-4870-A22C-0859A058A73A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6125149 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/061487A2-FFDD-D14B-FF58-FA8BFCF5FDCB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Biphallapodema oligodentata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Biphallapodema oligodentata View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 17–27 View FIGURES 13 – 20 View FIGURES 21 – 27 )
Type material. Holotype male ( HNHM, body in a canada balsam preparation, abdomen with synsternite as well as genitalia with a part of S8 separated, and kept in a plastic microvial with glycerol): CONGO: Brazzaville, ORSTOM park, soil traps in forest, 2. I. 1964.—14 days, leg. J. Balogh & A. Zicsi—Hung. Soil-Zool. Exp., Congo No. 572.
Paratypes ( HNHM): 2 males 1 female (in a canada balsam preparation, males’ abdomen and genitalia in a plastic microvial with glycerol): ibid., 21. XI. 1963 - soil traps in forest, 3 days, No. 219. 1 male 2 females, 1 male 1 female (in 2 canada balsam preparations, abdomen and genitalia of the latter male in a plastic microvial with glycerol): ibid., soil traps around leaf-compost, No. 219, 16. XI. 1963, 20 days.
Description. Measurements in mm: body length 1.50 (holotype), 1.42–1.60 (paratypes); wing length 1.20 (holotype), 1.14–1.28 (paratypes); wing width 0.58 (holotype), 0.57–0.60 (paratypes). The two species of the genus differ in details of the male and female genitalia. Thus, only those characteristics are described below.
Male. Sternite 5 ( Figs. 21–22 View FIGURES 21 – 27 ) with a not divided broad medio-caudal emargination, which bears a pair of processes of 5–6 long flat pegs each. Surstylus ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 21 – 27 ) with anterior part narrower than in B. polydentata . Basiphallus ( Figs 23, 26 View FIGURES 21 – 27 ) larger but epiphallus thinner than in B. polydentata . Distiphallus ( Figs 26–27 View FIGURES 21 – 27 ) with a large ventrally curved apical process, which is dentate on margins; an additional dorsal process also present.
Postgonite ( Figs 23–24 View FIGURES 21 – 27 ) seems more strongly connected to the lower branch of connecting sclerite than in B. polydentata . Postgonite with a blunt caudal, as well as a very broad apical lobe each.
Female sternite 8 ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13 – 20 ) weakly sclerotised, covered by small hairs, except anterior margin, sternite 8 bears some very short setulae only. Hypoproct ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 20 ) strongly sclerotised on a broad caudal rim, medial part membranous, its strong caudal part bears 2–3 upcurved setae in ventral view. Epiproct ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 13 – 20 ) comparatively large with minute hairs, except antero-lateral parts; its setal pair thin but long. Cercus ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 13 – 20 ) normal in shape, each with a pair of very long apical and medial pair of setae. Spermathecae ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 13 – 20 ) peculiar in shape: proximodistally flattened with a subcylindrical, more sclerotised inner part, sclerotised parts of ducts short with a bulbous distal end each. That is, common duct of paired spermathecae very short, its bulb occupies more than half of it.
Etymology. The specific epithet of this new species (‘oligodentata’ = a few teeth) refers to the low-numbered (5 each) pegs on the pair of processes on male sternite 5.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |