Paralasianthus brevipes (H. Zhu) H.Zhu, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.202.4.5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13639940 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/063387C5-236D-7F0D-FF78-5E25FB513E66 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Paralasianthus brevipes (H. Zhu) H.Zhu |
status |
comb. nov. |
3. Paralasianthus brevipes (H. Zhu) H.Zhu View in CoL , comb. nov.
Lasianthus brevipes Craib (1933: 20) View in CoL , nom. illeg., non Valeton (1927). Saprosma brevipes H. Zhu (2001: 148) View in CoL . Type:— THAILAND. Nakawn Sritamarat, s.d., A.F.G. Kerr 15641 (holotype K! (K 000777001), isotypes, BK!, BM!).
Distribution — Thailand.
Note:— Lasianthus brevipes Craib is an illegitimate name (homonym of Lasianthus brevipes Valeton ). Zhu (2001: 148) attempted to make the new combination Saprosma brevipes based on L. brevipes Craib , which was also an invalid name. Zhu (2001: 148) inadvertently published the name Saprosma brevipes with a direct reference to Craib’s (1933: 20) diagnosis and Latin description of L. brevipes Craib , and cited holotype and isotypes of the new taxon. Therefore, the correct name for this species is P. brevipes (H. Zhu) H. Zhu , which is based on S. brevipes H. Zhu.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paralasianthus brevipes (H. Zhu) H.Zhu
Zhu, Hua 2015 |
Lasianthus brevipes
Zhu, H. 2001: ) |
Craib, W. G. 1933: ) |