Indoscelimena india (Hancock, 1907) Muhammad & Tan & Abdullah & Azirun & Bhaskar & Skejo, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4485.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EDC89718-2F45-494A-80F1-A187DA926CC4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5959544 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0636885F-FF93-7259-FF74-57F9FBFB8222 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Indoscelimena india (Hancock, 1907) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Indoscelimena india (Hancock, 1907) View in CoL , comb. nov.
Scelimena india: Hancock 1907b View in CoL , Kirby 1910, Kirby 1914, Günther 1938a, Steinmann 1970, Otte 1979, Shishodia & Hazra 1985, Blackith 1992, Shishodia 1995, Shishodia et al. 2010, Storozhenko & Dawwrueng 2015, Zha et al. 2017.
Eugavialidium indicum: Hancock 1915 View in CoL .
Type material not examined. Hancock (1907b) wrote about two specimens of S. india , but without mentioning their sex. However, according to measurements provided (length of body entire, male 19.5 mm, pronotum 18 mm, posterior femora 7 mm) it is probable that those are two male syntypes. The type (or types?) are deposited in Philadelphia and according to OSF, there is a male holotype.
Type locality: India: Assam: Cherrapunjee [ Cherapunji in Hancock (1907b)].
Notes. In original description Hancock (1907b) wrote that the species is like S. producta [tentative comparison] but stouter, pronotal carinae have yellow markings, vertex is almost equal in width to one eye, anterior margin of the pronotum is somewhat angular, pronotum is extended beyond the knees almost to tibial apices, dorsum granulated, depressed and uneven, humeral angles unarmed (no ML), behind the shoulders bifossulate, with a pair of rounded slightly nodules, posterior process stout at the base and acuminate toward the apex, anterior margin of the pronotum little protuberant and subtuberculate (present FM), lateral lobes' anterior margin armed with small tubercles, while the posterior laminate outwards, and armed with a distinct, acute spine directed transversely but little curved forward. Hind femora without teeth. Hind tibiae and the first segment of the posterior tarsi less dilated than in S. producta . According to this description, it is clear that the species is closer to Indoscelimena species than to Scelimena , and is thus transferred to the genus Indoscelimena . We have examined a male specimen from Assam that fits Hancock's description (from Khasi Hills, examined in MNCN Madrid), and a male collected in India recently (by H. Song, Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ), and assigned them to this species.
MNCN |
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Scelimeninae |
Tribe |
Scelimenini |
Genus |
Indoscelimena india (Hancock, 1907)
Muhammad, Amira Aqilah, Tan, Ming Kai, Abdullah, Nurul Ashikin, Azirun, Mohammad Sofian, Bhaskar, Dhaneesh & Skejo, Josip 2018 |
Eugavialidium indicum
: Hancock 1915 |
Scelimena india
: Hancock 1907 |