Maevia C.L. Koch, 1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2017.12.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D95FCAB4-DD25-40CF-90EF-420988CD8A1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12725419 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/070387A0-590F-D434-5B99-F8A3FB7EFE24 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Maevia C.L. Koch, 1846 |
status |
|
Maevia C.L. Koch, 1846 View in CoL and Paramaevia F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1901
Edwards' (1977: 22) opinion: " Paramaevia Barnes. ... should not have been erected and all species in it should revert back into Maevia , since Maevia (Paramaevia) michelsoni Barnes is intermediate between the two" is not supported by any diagnostic documentation, so he probably refers to external appearance of these spiders. There are, however, striking differences in palps and epigyne of these genera (see drawings of their respective type species Fig. 14M and Fig. 10J View Figure 10 , see also files http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/q18- Maevia .html and http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/q28-Paramaev.html respectively), suggesting
classification not only in different genera but in different groups of genera. Such difference in the most important and useful diagnostic characters exclude possibility that these forms may be congeneric. Therefore:
Maevia hobbsae Barnes, 1958 = Paramaevia hobbsae Barnes, 1958 (reinstatement of the previous
combination, documentation as above).
Maevia michelsoni Barnes, 1958 = Paramaevia michelsoni (Barnes, 1958) (reinstatement of the
previous combination, documentation as above).
Maevia poultoni Peckham & Peckham, 1909 = Paramaevia poultoni (Peckham & Peckham, 1901)
(type species) (reinstatement of the previous combination, documentation as above).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.