Coryphasia, Simon, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2017.12.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D95FCAB4-DD25-40CF-90EF-420988CD8A1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12725441 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/070387A0-5966-D45A-5B99-FBB3FE9BFA77 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Coryphasia |
status |
|
Coryphasia View in CoL , Asaphobelis and Siloca
Type species of the above genera differ strikingly in internal structure of epigyne and also in palps, compare diagnostic drawings of Coryphasia albibarbis Simon, 1902 ( Fig. 38J) with these of Asaphobelis physonychus ( Fig. 38K) and Siloca campestrata ( Fig. 38L). Merging of them is totally unacceptable and reflects on merging of their congeners. Misinterpretation of placement was assisted by excessive diagrammatizing of drawings of internal structures of epigyne. Therefore:
Coryphasia physonycha (Simon, 1902) = Asaphobelis physonychus Simon, 1902 (reinstated
combination, do not agree with morphological characters of type species of Coryphasia compare
Figs 38J with 38K)
Coryphasia campestrata (Simon, 1902) = Siloca campestrata Simon, 1902 (reinstated combination,
do not agree with morphological characters of type species of Coryphasia - compare Figs 38J with
38L).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.