Diostracus Loew, 1861
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2013.61 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C47F5484-764A-41E9-8913-3CCB0092B0DF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3843921 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0705B36D-FFDF-1C0C-F23E-A7E002DF4F86 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Diostracus Loew, 1861 |
status |
|
Subgenus Diostracus Loew, 1861 View in CoL View at ENA
Diostracus Loew, 1861a: 43 View in CoL ; Takagi 1968: 35 (diagnosis), 51 (redescription of type species). — Grichanov et al. 2011b: 22 (diagnosis).
Asphyrotarsus Oldenberg, 1916: 193 . — Negrobov 1978: 406 (synonym of Diostracus Loew, 1861 View in CoL ). — Type species: Liancalus leucostomus Loew, 1861 View in CoL (original designation).
Diagnosis
At present the nominotypical subgenus differs from other subgenera in having a dorsally setose antennal scape. It is worth noting that many Asian Diostracus species were described with a glabrous scape (e.g., Saigusa 1984, 1995; Saigusa et al. 1997; Yang et al. 2011).
Type species
Diostracus prasinus Loew, 1861 View in CoL (by monotypy).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Diostracus Loew, 1861
Grichanov, Igor Ya. 2013 |
Asphyrotarsus
Oldenberg L. 1916: 193 |
Negrobov 1978: 406 |
Diostracus
Grichanov I. Ya. & Selivanova O. V. & Negrobov O. P. 2011: 22 |
Takagi S. 1968: 35 |
Loew H. 1861: 43 |