Ecnomina gippslandica, Cartwright, 2008
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1774.1.1 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5124241 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0749822F-FFA8-607D-6AE7-CDD8CA26AEC2 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Ecnomina gippslandica |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Ecnomina gippslandica sp. nov.
Figs 162–164 View FIGURES 162–167 , 193 View FIGURES 184–195
Diagnosis. Ecnomina gippslandica most closely resembles E. serrata and E. sheldoni from which it is distinguished because the superior appendages are not tapered in distal half and also have a small excision apically.
Description. Head, body and wings brown; wings similar to E. merki ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 168–174 ). Forewing length about 2.9–3.2 times width: male 3.3–3.6 mm, female 3.8 mm. Forewing fork 2 relatively long, sessile, length about 1.4–1.5 times length of fork 3; fork 3 relatively short, with long footstalk, length fork about 2.5–4.6 times length footstalk, footstalk length about 1.2–1.6 times length cross-vein m, r-m and m nearly contiguous at footstalk fork 3, r-m and m separated by about 0.4–0.8 times length of cross-vein m; fork 4 slightly shorter than fork 3; fork 5 long, length about twice length of fork 4. Hindwing length about 3.3 times width, fork 2 sessile, length about 1.6–1.7 times length of fork 3.
Male Tergum X membranous, with one pair of robust dorsal processes, relatively widely separated, slightly crenulated meso-distally, about two thirds length of superior appendages ( Fig. 164 View FIGURES 162–167 ). Superior appendages in lateral view, length about 4 times width, not tapered distally, with small apical excision ( Fig. 162 View FIGURES 162–167 ); in dorsal view, length about 5 times width, with one pair of long mesal spines and several pairs of shorter spines distally ( Fig. 164 View FIGURES 162–167 ). Phallus simple, tube-like, robust ( Fig. 162 View FIGURES 162–167 ). Inferior appendages short; in ventral view, length about half width, fused in basal half, dilated and truncated distally, with small oval excision meso-distally ( Fig. 163 View FIGURES 162–167 ); in lateral view, slender, slightly curved, length about 5 times width ( Fig. 162 View FIGURES 162–167 ).
Female. Genitalia with a single, elongate, slender mesal process on sternite VIII, with a pair of small semicircular structures at base; segment IX relatively long, tapered slightly distally, segment X relatively short and segments IX and X relatively slender ( Fig. 193 View FIGURES 184–195 ).
Holotype male: Victoria, Back Ck, trib. Cann R., Noorinbee North (about 37°26'S, 149°13'E), UV lt, 10 Dec 2003, D. Cartwright ( NMV, T-19870). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: Victoria. 5 males, 5 females (specimen CT-541 figured), collected with holotype GoogleMaps ; 1 male (specimen CT-461 figured), Betka R. pumping station, 27 Mar 1974 , A.N.; 1 male, Noorinbee North nr Cann R., 30 Dec 1975 , M.S. Moulds; 1 male, Tennyson Ck, 5 km NW of Buldah , 37°14'S, 149°07'E, 1–7 Jan 1982 GoogleMaps , Anzses exped.; 1 male, Buffalo R. at Nug Nug, 15 km S of Myrtleford , 13 Jan 1982 , A.W.
Other material examined: Victoria. 1 pharate male, 2 females, Back Ck, trib. Cann R ., Noorinbee North, UV lt, 10 Dec 2003, D. Cartwright; 1 male, 1 female, Thomson R ., Bells Clearing, 2 Dec 1977, NMV Survey ( NMV) .
Etymology. Gippslandica - named for the type locality (East Gippsland, Victoria).
Remarks. Ecnomina gippslandica has been collected from six localities in the eastern half of Victoria (latitudinal range 36°42'- 37°40'S).
| R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
| UV |
Departamento de Biologia de la Universidad del Valle |
| NMV |
Museum Victoria |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |