Agriopodes geminata (Smith)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.421.7424 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B69FD062-806F-4AE7-8C68-1F8FD650D2A7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/07DDEA33-065F-2F76-D523-0A50752EE2B9 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Agriopodes geminata (Smith) |
status |
|
Taxon classification Animalia Lepidoptera Noctuidae
Agriopodes geminata (Smith) View in CoL
Moma geminata Smith, 1903
Remarks.
Acronicta fallax exhibits a moderate range of geographic variation (Fig. 2), with a gradual increase in size and extent of forewing black markings with increasing latitude. The northwestern-most populations from Manitoba, Saskatchewan and eastern Alberta mark the extreme end of this cline, and have been treated as a separate species, Agriopodes geminata . We can find no consistent differences in genitalic structure between Acronicta fallax and Acronicta geminata , and differences in COI barcodes fall well within the range of variation of Acronicta fallax , as discussed above. We therefore consider geminata to be a geographic form of Acronicta fallax (syn. n.). Acronicta geminata Draudt, 1950 of China is a junior secondary homonym of Acronicta geminata (Smith), but since we treat the latter as a junior subjective synonym of Acronicta fallax , no replacement name for Acronicta geminata Draudt is necessary.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |