Stethusa klimschi ( Bernhauer, 1909 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.156493 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510546 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0846107D-832A-6D59-FEFE-FAC3FCA1FC24 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stethusa klimschi ( Bernhauer, 1909 ) |
status |
|
Stethusa klimschi ( Bernhauer, 1909) View in CoL
( Figs. 21 View FIGURES 18 21 , 4357 View FIGURES 43 47 View FIGURES 48 52 View FIGURES 53 57 )
Atheta View in CoL (s. str.) klimschi Bernhauer, 1909: 523 View in CoL .
Atheta (Stethusa) klimschi: Casey, 1910: 5 View in CoL (as valid species).
Atheta sulcata Blatchley, 1910: 355 View in CoL .
Atheta (Hypatheta) klimschi: Fenyes, 1920: 207 View in CoL (as valid species). Atheta sulcata: Fenyes, 1920: 227 View in CoL (as valid species of doubtful systematic position). Atheta (Hypatheta) klimschi: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 653 View in CoL (as valid species). Atheta (Earota) sulcata: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 655 View in CoL (as valid species). Atheta (Stethusa) klimschi: Moore & Legner, 1975: 364 View in CoL (as valid species). Atheta (Earota) sulcata: Moore & Legner, 1975: 375 View in CoL (as valid species). Stethusa klimschi: Seevers, 1978: 267 View in CoL (as valid species).
Earota sulcata: Seevers, 1978: 271 (as valid species).
Atheta klimschi: Gusarov, 2002b: 14 View in CoL View Cited Treatment (as valid species).
Atheta sulcata: Gusarov, 2002b: 14 View in CoL (as synonym of At. klimschi View in CoL ).
Type material. Lectotype of Atheta klimschi (designated by Gusarov (2002b)), UNITED STATES: Louisiana: St. Landry Parish: ɗ, Opelousas, vi; paralectotype of Atheta klimschi , UNITED STATES: Louisiana: ɗ, Opelousas, vi ( FMNH).
Lectotype of Atheta sulcata (designated by Gusarov (2002b)), UNITED STATES: Indiana: Posey Co.: ɗ, 22.iv.1909 ( PURC).
Additional material. United States: Louisiana: St. Landry Parish: 2ɗɗ, Opelousas, v (Klimsch) ( FMNH); Mississippi: Warren Co.: 2ɗɗ, 3ΨΨ, "·Miss." [Vicksburg (according to Casey locality Code (FitzGerald 1962))] ( NMNH (Casey collection)).
Diagnosis. Stethusa klimschi differs from S. dichroa in the following characters: the lack of subbasal impressions of the terminal antennal article; the apex of median lobe is narrower in ventral view ( Figs. 4849 View FIGURES 48 52 ; 2930) and straight in lateral view ( Figs. 5051 View FIGURES 48 52 ; 31 32); the lack of the distal spines of the internal sac ( Figs. 54 View FIGURES 53 57 ; 3839); the shape of the spermatheca ( Figs. 57 View FIGURES 53 57 ; 4142); and the lack of a female accessory sclerite.
Stethusa klimschi differs from S. spuriella in having a larger body size; straight apex of the median lobe (in lateral view; Figs. 5051 View FIGURES 48 52 ; 6566); and a longer spermatheca ( Figs. 57 View FIGURES 53 57 ; 70).
Description. Length 3.23.5 mm. Head dark brown, pronotum and abdomen reddish brown to brown, segments 56 darker than the rest of the abdomen; elytra brownish yellow with darker area around scutellum and epipleura, legs brownish yellow, mouthparts and antennae brown, two basal antennal segments yellowish.
Head surface glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture, with fine punctation, distance between punctures equals 2 times their diameter. Eyes very large, 3.55 times as long as temples. Antennal article 2 is 1.1 times as long as article 3, articles 46 subquadrate, 710 slightly transverse, article 11 as long as articles 9 and 10 combined.
Pronotum transverse, 1.3 times as wide as head, width 0.690.77 mm, length 0.540.61 mm, width to length ratio 1.3; glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture; punctation as fine as on head but denser, distance between punctures equal to 12 times their diameter. Elytra much wider (0.860.96 mm) and longer (0.670.74 mm; measured from humeral angle) than pronotum (elytral length to pronotal length ratio 1.2), 1.3 times wider than long, surface glossy, with poorly visible microsculpture; punctation fine and slightly asperate, distance between punctures equals 12 times their diameter.
Abdominal terga glossy, with weak microsculpture consisting of transverse waves; with fine punctation, distance between punctures equals 13 times their diameter on terga 35 and 36 times on terga 67. Apical margin of tergum 7 with white palisade fringe.
Male tergum 7 with elongate medial tubercle in front of posterior margin. Posterior margin of male tergum 8 with two blunt medial projections and two lateral denticles ( Figs. 43, 45 View FIGURES 43 47 ).
Aedeagus as in Figs. 4856 View FIGURES 48 52 View FIGURES 53 57 , internal sac without distal spines ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 53 57 ).
Female without accessory sclerite. Spermatheca as in Fig. 57 View FIGURES 53 57 .
Discussion. In my earlier paper ( Gusarov 2002b) I argued that S. klimschi did not belong to Earota because of the narrower mesosternal process, and tentatively placed this species in Atheta . Although in S. klimschi the mesosternal process is indeed narrower than in Earota it is still broader than in Atheta . Stethusa klimschi can be distinguished from Atheta based on additional characters listed in the diagnosis of Stethusa .
Distribution. Stethusa klimschi is known from Louisiana, Mississippi and southern Indiana ( Fig. 111 View FIGURE 111 ).
Natural History. No information is available.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stethusa klimschi ( Bernhauer, 1909 )
Gusarov, Vladimir I. 2003 |
Atheta sulcata:
Gusarov 2002: 14 |
Earota sulcata:
Seevers 1978: 271 |
Atheta (Hypatheta) klimschi:
Seevers 1978: 267 |
Moore 1975: 364 |
Moore 1975: 375 |
Bernhauer 1926: 653 |
Bernhauer 1926: 655 |
Fenyes 1920: 207 |
Fenyes 1920: 227 |
Atheta (Stethusa) klimschi:
Casey 1910: 5 |
Atheta sulcata
Blatchley 1910: 355 |
Atheta
Bernhauer 1909: 523 |