Actinopus argenteus Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018

Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), Megataxa 2 (1), pp. 1-256 : 176

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655651
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF22-CEF2-FF77-F8C2DF143B48
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Actinopus argenteus Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
status

Treatment

Actinopus argenteus Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL

Actinopus argenteus Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 26 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 10 A–I, 11 A–D, 44 (holotype ♂, [31º 20’ S 65º 27’ W], Reserva Natural Chancaní, Córdoba, Argentina, 15–30.i.2004, M. Izquierdo leg., MACN-Ar 31204; and paratype ♀, same data as the male holotype, iii.1992, P. Goloboff and C. Szumik, MACN-Ar 36576; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.

Diagnosis. Males of Actinopus argenteus share with A. tutu ( Fig. 143 View FIGURE 143 A–C), A. azaghal ( Fig. 148 View FIGURE 148 A–C) and A. pindapoy ( Fig. 159 View FIGURE 159 A–C) the PA continuous to PAc. They differ from A. azaghal , A. longipalpis ( Fig. 156 View FIGURE 156 A–C), A. pampa ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 27 G–H), and A. pindapoy by BTA inserted dorsally on the tegulum, and from A. tutu¸A. azaghal , A. itacolomi ( Fig. 153 View FIGURE 153 A–C) and A. pindapoy by PS reaching less than the width of embolus. Females of A. argenteus share with A. tutu ( Fig. 143 D View FIGURE 143 ) the similar subquadrate shape of receptacles. Males differ from those of the trilobate receptacles bearing a conspicouous lateral constriction.