Brachysandalus Stål, 1867
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5490.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E939D165-05C8-4557-BF13-751B26188C39 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13309825 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0A0987BA-FFF3-FFF3-D69C-FE55B2A0D811 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Brachysandalus Stål, 1867 |
status |
|
Genus Brachysandalus Stål, 1867 View in CoL
Brachysandalus Stål, 1867: 260 ; Maldonado Capriles (1990: 345).
Type species: Brachysandalus lurco Stål, 1867 , by subsequent designation ( Jeannel, 1919: 253).
Brachysandalus : Stål (1874: 59), as subgenus of Pirates .
Brachysandalus : Villiers (1968: 1175), reinstated as genus.
Brachysandalus : Cassis & Gross (1995: 339) and ABRS (accessed August 2023), as subgenus of Peirates .
Diagnosis. Hemelytron usually with a pale (variants of yellow / white / orange) oval or variable shaped spot involving apical area of clavus and adjoining area of corium between veins Pcu+1A and Cu (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ) (note, only rarely this pale spot is indistinguishable), and an inconspicuous yellowish, thin, curved stripe near base of costal margin on membrane (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ).
Head with postocular region ellipsoidal, almost rounded to neck, neck with lateral tubercles tiny (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ). Pronotum with collar lateral process distinct and rounded apically, lateral margins of anterior pronotal lobe arcuate (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ); ventral surface of fore femur with bristly setae and / or tubercles of varying size and shape, or teeth; fore and mid tibiae gradually thickened and expanded to apex, fore tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying over 1/3 but no more than 1/2 tibial length, mid tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying about 1/3 tibial length (e.g., Figs.1B&C View FIGURE 1 ). Brachypterous form with anterior pronotal lobe spherical, posterior lobe distinctly abbreviated; hemelytron rarely surpassing second abdominal tergite (e.g., Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Males with sternum VII on left side with (e.g., Figs. 55 View FIGURE 55 , 56 View FIGURE 56 ) or less commonly without an extragenital process. Pygophore oval in ventral view (e.g., Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), paramere curved and usually subtriangular (e.g., 2D&E), dorsal phallothecal sclerite, strongly sclerotized and broad, apex obtuse or rounded (e.g., Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ); base of venter of phallosoma with a pair of slender sclerites (e.g., Fig. 2G View FIGURE 2 ).
Redescription. Head: Sub-fusiform in dorsal view, anteocular region elongate triangular, postocular region ellipsoidal, anteocular region distinctly longer than postocular, frontoclypeal sulcus distinct; postocular region almost rounded to neck, neck with lateral tubercles not developed; ventral surface of head tumid before eyes; maxillary plate developed. Antennae with all segments cylindrical, scape thickest and shortest, apical three segments slender and of subequal length. Eye reniform, usually not reaching ventral margin in lateral view, width of eye usually shorter than width of interocular space in dorsal view, sometimes wider than width of interocular space in males. Ocelli well developed and located on tubercles in macropterous form, reduced, obsolete and not raised or slightly raised in brachypterous form. Labium with second visible segment longest, tumid on ventral side.
Thorax: Pronotum with collar lateral process distinct, apex rounded, anterior pronotal lobe subtrapezoidal with lateral margins arcuate, posterior pronotal lobe arcuately quadrate, humeri rounded, length of anterior pronotal lobe less than twice length of posterior lobe in macropterous form; anterior pronotal lobe nearly spherical, posterior lobe distinctly shortened, much shorter than anterior lobe in brachypterous form; integument of stripes on anterior lobe pilose and rough. Propleuron with integument often finely granulate, set off from dorsal surface by a carina, stridulitrum long total-striate type. Scutellum triangular, slightly wider than long, disc flat, “Y” shaped ridges distinct. Pleural and sternal integument finely granulate, metapleural sulcus curved with median part often nearly straight in macropterous form and entirely arcuate in brachypterous form; mesosternum with disc raised, metasternum raised with disc mostly flat. Hemelytra fully developed in macropterous or reduced in brachypterous forms.
Legs: Fore coxa elongate, mid and hind coxae globular, mid coxae separated from each other by less than width of one coxa. Fore femur highly thickened, much thicker than mid and hind femora, ventral surface of fore femur usually with tubercles or teeth of varying size and shape, usually arranged in inner and outer rows separated by a shallow median furrow along length of femur, in addition with bristly setae, ventral surface of mid femur also often armed with tubercles or teeth in addition to bristly setae. Fore and mid tibiae gradually thickened to apex, apex expanded, fore tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying over 1/3 but no more than 1/2 tibial length, mid tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying about 1/3 tibial length, hind tibia slender and straight, slightly incrassate at apex. Tarsi three-segmented.
Abdomen: Elongate parallel sided in male and nearly fusiform in female; venter of abdomen in male usually with a median ridge running from posterior portion of second abdominal sternite to posterior portion of seventh abdominal sternite and curved slightly to right side of body. Male sternum VII on left side with, or less commonly without, a visible extragenital process. Pygophore oval in ventral view with median pygophore process oblique to right side; paramere curved and usually subtriangular; dorsal, and lateral phallothecal sclerites strongly sclerotized, dorsal phallothecal sclerite broad, apex obtuse or rounded; base of venter of phallosoma with a pair of slender sclerites.
Comparative notes. In addition to Brachysandalus , there are three peiratine genera distributed in Australia, viz., Ectomocoris Mayr, 1865 , Microsandalus Stål, 1867 and Sirthenea Spinola, 1837 . Brachysandalus can be easily separated from Sirthenea by anteocular part of head less than three times as long as postocular part and antennal insertion near anterior margin of eye (vs. anteocular part of head more than three times as long as postocular part and antennal insertion approximately at middle of anteocular part of head in Sirthenea ). Brachysandalus is more similar in general body shape with Ectomocoris and Microsandalus , and most Australian species of these three genera have wing dimorphism. But Brachysandalus differs from the other two in fore tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying over 1/3 but no more than 1/2 tibial length (vs. fore tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying more than 1/2 of tibial length in Ectomocoris and fore tibia with fossula spongiosa occupying slightly less than 1/3 of tibial length in Microsandalus ). Also, in Brachysandalus , ventral surface of fore femur with bristly setae and / or tubercles of varying size and shape, or teeth, but in Ectomocoris , ventral surface of fore femur with bristly setae only, without any tubercle or tooth, and in Brachysandalus , anterior pronotal lobe subtrapezoidal with collar lateral process distinct, while in Microsandalus , anterior pronotal lobe subspherical and plump with collar process not developed.
Brachysandalus was treated as subgenus of Peirates by Stål (1874), but it could be distinguished from Peirates by the armature on ventral surface of fore femur mentioned above and the common colour pattern that hemelytron usually with a pale spot involving apical area of clavus and adjoining area of corium between veins Pcu+1A and Cu (vs. ventral surface of fore femur without any tubercle or tooth and colour pattern of hemelytron varies among different species in Peirates ).
Key to species of Australian Brachysandalus
1. Macropterous—submacropterous......................................................................... 2
-. Brachypterous....................................................................................... 21
2. Hemelytron with pale (variants of yellow / orange / white), usually oval shaped patch involving only parts of clavus and adjoining area of corium between veins Pcu+1A and Cu (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ) (except this patch almost indistinguishable on corium in B. fuliginosus ( Erichson, 1842) ( Figs. 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ))......................................................... 3
-. Hemelytron with pale (variants of yellow / orange / white) area involving parts of clavus and adjoining area of corium between veins Pcu+1A and Cu as well as an extensive area of most of corium and basal area of membrane (e.g., Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ); (male extragenital process absent or only weakly developed, no males of B. erythromelas ( Walker, 1873) examined)........... 17
3. Membrane with broad subapical pale brownish yellow area contrasting with dark brown remainder area ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 )............................................................................... B. flavidus Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Membrane without such subapical brownish yellow area (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ).......................................... 4
4. Scape long, subequal to head length ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ); hemelytron very narrow, width of both hemelytra in situ covering about 1/2 abdominal width ( Fig. 28A View FIGURE 28 ); (cave dwelling species)............................ B. howarthi Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Scape short, usually much shorter than head length (e.g., Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); hemelytron not narrow as above (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 )......... 5
5. Fore femora long and slender, about 4X as long as maximum width ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 ).... B. longifemoratus Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Fore femora short and robust, about 3X as long as maximum width (e.g., Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 )................................... 6
6. Body large, ca 20 mm or larger.......................................................................... 7
-. Body small to medium, much shorter than 18 mm ........................................................... 9
7. Legs and antennae coloured pale / yellow in contrast to dark brown to black pronotum and hemelytron ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ).......................................................................................... B. ephippiger (White, 1843)
-. Legs and antennae similarly coloured dark as pronotum and hemelytron ( Figs. 26 View FIGURE 26 , 46 View FIGURE 46 )............................... 8
8. Male extragenital process flat and broad triangular shaped ( Figs. 55A View FIGURE 55 , 56A View FIGURE 56 ); tip of scutellum bluntly upturned as seen in lateral view ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ); body usually jet black, particularly pronotum, abdomen and legs smooth ( Fig. 46 View FIGURE 46 )................................................................................................. B. sepulchralis ( Distant, 1902)
-. Male extragenital process long, flat spine-like ( Figs. 55D View FIGURE 55 , 56D View FIGURE 56 ); tip of scutellum bluntly projected backwards as seen in lateral view; body dark brown, pronotum, abdomen and legs not smooth, distinctly covered with hairs of varying lengths ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 )...................................................................................... B. helluo Stål, 1867
9. Legs yellowish like connexivum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 )............................................ B. crassifemur ( Reuter, 1881)
-. Legs brown, dark brown or black like connexivum (e.g., Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 )............................................... 10
10. Body <10 mm; pronotum black and shiny................................................................ 11
-. Body much more than 10 mm; pronotum dark brown to black and not shiny...................................... 12
11. Venter of abdomen mostly black or dark brown ( Fig. 44B View FIGURE 44 )................................... B. punctorius Stål, 1867
-. Venter of abdomen orangish brown except sternite VII and posterior end dark brown ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ).............................................................................................. B. ayyammae Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
12. Body from above almost uniformly black or brownish black, pale area involving clavus and corium indistinct or almost absent ( Figs. 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ); (southern Australian distribution).................................. B. fuliginosus ( Erichson, 1842)
-. Body from above brown or dark brown, pale area involving clavus and corium large and conspicuous (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 )..... 13
13. Membrane with a vague yellow patch near confluence of veins Cu and M ( Fig. 38A View FIGURE 38 )...................................................................................................... B. maculatus Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Membrane without vague yellow patch near confluence of veins Cu and M (e.g., Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 )........................... 14
14. Posterior pronotal lobe narrow, less than 1.5X as wide as anterior lobe width ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 )......... B. alutaceus ( Reuter, 1881)
-. Posterior pronotal lobe broad, about or more than 1.5X as wide as anterior lobe width (e.g., Fig. 24A View FIGURE 24 )................. 15
15. Legs dark brown except apex of fore femur and basal portion of fore tibia yellowish brown ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 ); male extragenital process well developed, in the form of a minute tooth ( Figs. 55L View FIGURE 55 , 56L View FIGURE 56 )................. B. gunbalanyae Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Legs generally unicolor ( Figs. 36 View FIGURE 36 , 53 View FIGURE 53 ); male extragenital process absent ( Fig. 36C View FIGURE 36 ), or rarely present as a greatly reduced remnant process ( Figs. 55M–P View FIGURE 55 , 56M–P View FIGURE 56 ); (females brachypterous).............................................. 16
16. Eyes large, eye width subequal to interocular space ( Fig. 36A View FIGURE 36 ); widely distributed except in Western Australia ................................................................................................. B. lurco Stål, 1867
-. Eyes small, eye width about 2/3 interocular space ( Fig. 53A View FIGURE 53 ); distributed only in Western Australia ........................................................................................ B. westraliensis Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
17. Legs dark or black coloured contrasting with pale (yellow/ white) corium (e.g., Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 )............................ 18
-. Legs pale coloured like most of corium (e.g., Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 )....................................................... 19
18. Abdominal venter generally pale, except sternite VII dark ( Fig. 11B View FIGURE 11 ).................... B. erythromelas ( Walker, 1873)
-. Abdominal venter uniformly dark brown or black like legs ( Figs. 17B View FIGURE 17 , 18B View FIGURE 18 )................ B. fulvipennis ( Walker, 1873)
19. Body size 12–14 mm; fore and mid femora ventrally with two or three conspicuous forwardly directed spinelike teeth in addition to minute tubercles ( Fig. 32B&C View FIGURE 32 )............................................. B. limbatus ( Reuter, 1881)
-. Body size <10 mm; fore and mid femora ventrally with only minute tubercles ( Figs. 21 View FIGURE 21 , 40 View FIGURE 40 )........................ 20
20. Posterior pronotal lobe integument densely and finely pitted or punctured ( Fig. 40A View FIGURE 40 ); hemelytron with apical 2/3 of clavus and adjoining area of corium between veins PCu+1A and Cu yellowish white ( Fig. 40A View FIGURE 40 )........................................................................................................ B. pallidus Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Posterior pronotal lobe integument not densely and finely pitted or punctured ( Fig. 21A View FIGURE 21 ); hemelytron with apical 2/3 of clavus and adjoining area of corium between veins PCu+1A and Cu yellow ( Fig. 21A View FIGURE 21 )........ B. fulvipes Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
21. Body including wing pads uniformly dark / black, wing pads with posterior margin truncate ( Fig. 14D View FIGURE 14 )............................................................................................. B. fuliginosus ( Erichson, 1842)
-. Body including wing pads dark and pale, wing pads with posterior margin gradually rounded (e.g., Figs. 19A&B View FIGURE 19 )....... 22
22. Legs and connexivum similarly uniformly coloured orange-yellow ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 ).................. B. limbatus ( Reuter, 1881)
-. Legs and connexivum coloured otherwise (e.g., Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 )...................................................... 23
23. Legs contrastingly coloured lighter than abdomen ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 ); (wing pads with basal 1/3 dark brown, apical 2/3 yellow with lateral areas yellowish brown)............................................... B. fulvipes Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Legs similarly coloured dark or black like most of abdomen (e.g., Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 )........................................ 24
24. Body particularly pronotum and legs shiny smooth black (e.g., Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ); body <10 mm .............................. 25
-. Body particularly pronotum and legs dark brown to black, not shiny and smooth (e.g., Fig. 19A&B View FIGURE 19 ); body> 10 mm ...... 26
25. Venter of abdomen uniformly black or dark brown ( Fig. 43C&F View FIGURE 43 )............................. B. punctorius Stål, 1867
-. Venter of abdomen with connexivum and medial areas of sternites with orangish brown or pale markings ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ).............................................................................. B. ayyammae Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
26. Abdominal tergites VI and VII densely covered with golden setae in addition to dark setae but not on other tergites (better seen in posterior slanting view of specimen) (e.g., Fig. 48 View FIGURE 48 )........................................ B. setosus ( Stål, 1874)
-. Abdominal tergites VI and VII not densely covered with golden setae but only dark setae like other tergites ( Fig. 19A&B View FIGURE 19 ). 27
27. Wing pad almost entirely yellow except dark extreme basal area ( Fig. 19A&B View FIGURE 19 ).............. B. fulvipennis ( Walker, 1873)
-. Wing pad basal 1/2–2/3 including narrow costal band on corium black or dark, other area pale coloured................ 28
28. Distribution in Western Australia only; male extragenital process absent or occasionally present as a greatly reduced structure ( Figs. 55M–P View FIGURE 55 , 56M–P View FIGURE 56 )................................................. B. westraliensis Malipatil & Liu , sp. nov.
-. Distribution in Australia except Western Australia; male extragenital process absent.................. B. lurco Stål, 1867
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Brachysandalus Stål, 1867
Liu, Yingqi & Cai, Wanzhi 2024 |
Brachysandalus Stål, 1867: 260
Stal 1867: 260 |
Brachysandalus
Stal 1867 |
Brachysandalus
Stal 1867 |