Chrysis indigotea, Dufour & Perris, 1840
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3758372 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3806111 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0A687E00-A574-415A-8CBE-F725FD114136 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Chrysis indigotea |
status |
|
Chrysis indigotea DUFOUR & PERRIS, 1840
Chrysis indigotea DUFOUR & PERRIS, 1840: 38. Syntypes; France (Lund, Paris).
Chrysis indica SCHRANK, 1802: KIMSEY & BOHART 1991: 422.
Chrysis indica : TARBINSKY 2000: 193 (key), 197 (cat., distr., Kyrgyzstan: Kyrgyzskiy crest, ur. Ala-Archa river).
R e m a r k s: identification by TARBINSKY (2000) to be confirmed.
In KIMSEY & BOHART (1991) and TARBINSKY (2000) under the name Chrysis indica SCHRANK, 1802. This name was not in use after 1899. In particular, before KIMSEY & BOHART (1991) it was listed only by two authors as a possible synonym of C. indigotea DUFOUR & PERRIS, 1840 ( MOCSÁRY 1889; BISCHOFF 1913). After DUFOUR & PERRIS (1840) the name currently in use for the identification of this species was C. indigotea , which is still the name in current use (ICZN 1999: Article 23.9). Moreover, the type of C. indica is lost and its description could be also related to other species of this group, e.g. a small specimen of C. iris CHRIST. For these reasons I consider Chrysis indigotea as the valid name, and C. indica as nomen dubium and species inquirenda.
D i s t r i b u t i o n: Kyrgyzstan. West Palaearctic: central and southern Europe, northern Africa, Asia Minor ( LINSENMAIER 1959).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chrysis indigotea
Rosa, Paolo 2019 |
Chrysis indica
TARBINSKY Yu 2000: 193 |
Chrysis indigotea
DUFOUR & PERRIS, 1840: 38 |
Chrysis indica
KIMSEY & BOHART 1991: 422 |