Fustigeropsis Raffray, 1890
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7667945 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7668141 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B652D1E-FFAC-D905-FE6C-B007FBBF6F70 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fustigeropsis Raffray, 1890 |
status |
|
Genus Fustigeropsis Raffray, 1890 View in CoL
Fustigeropsis: Raffray 1890: 164 View in CoL , 167; 1897: 116; 1908: 438 (redescription, list of species); Jeannel 1964: 211 (redescription).
Diagnosis:Head almost twice as long as wide, maximum width across eyes, rostrum slightly expanded anteriorly and rounded, temples behind eyes parallel, antennae 4-segmented, antennomere I minuscule, not visible dorsally, antennomeres II and III subequal in size, slightly longer than wide, terminal antennomere very long, more than 7 times as long as III, apex of terminal antennomere truncate, covered with dense, erect setae; pronotum slightly wider than long, rugose, with small antebasal fovea, lateral foveae well-defined, lacking any sulcus; elytra shorter than abdomen, bearing weakly defined trichomes on posterior part, pair of trichomes also present on composite tergum and first visible paratergites, basal impression of composite tergum well-defined, simple in male; all femora simple, lacking spines in both sexes, mesotibiae in male with sharp preapical spines.
Sexual dimorphism: In female, mesotibiae are simple and lacking spines, the composite tergum with three basal lobes that are created by a short but stout median carina.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Fustigeropsis Raffray, 1890
Hlavác, Peter 2007 |
Fustigeropsis
: Raffray 1890: 164 |