Neoheegeria gigantea (Priesner)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.12 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F0D2DB07-30D5-4880-BEFA-11800E4DFAD8 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5983958 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C0F87CC-FFD8-171F-FF53-6605D79804D8 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Neoheegeria gigantea (Priesner) |
| status |
|
Neoheegeria gigantea (Priesner) View in CoL
Haplothrips giganteus Priesner, 1934: 279 View in CoL .
Described from Egypt on Cistanche lutea [ Scrophulariaceae ], a series of both sexes has also been collected from the same plant in Morocco (see Minaei et al. 2007). Minaei and Behmanesh (2012) reported N. gigantea View in CoL from Iran on the basis of 37 females collected from dead leaves of oak, Quercus View in CoL sp. These authors considered that these specimens represented an aestivation phase of N. gigantea View in CoL in leaf litter. Recent collections show that gigantea View in CoL sometimes has been collected on Astragalus View in CoL sp. [ Fabaceae View in CoL ] around Fars province (southern Iran). At one site near Shiraz both Stachys View in CoL sp. and Astragalus View in CoL sp. were growing close to each other, and sampling from those plants revealed that dalmatica View in CoL was on the first, but gigantea View in CoL on the second.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Neoheegeria gigantea (Priesner)
| Minaei, Kambiz, Fekrat, Lida & Mound, Laurence 2018 |
Haplothrips giganteus
| Priesner, 1934 : 279 |