Pterostichus (Orientostichus) makarovi Fedorenko, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.32.2.05 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C7D87AF-FFE9-3147-FCC3-FA68FEEEFD11 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pterostichus (Orientostichus) makarovi Fedorenko |
status |
|
2. Pterostichus (Orientostichus) makarovi Fedorenko , sp.n.
Figs 1 View Figs 1–3 , 18 View Figs 10–18 , 28 View Figs 19–30 , 44–45 View Figs 40–45 , 50 View Figs 46–51 .
MATERIAL. Holotype ♂ ( ZMMU) labelled: ‘N-Vietnam, 40 km W of/ Cao Bang, Phia Oac Mt. / 22°36´25´´N 105°52´08´´E, h~ 1650-1700 m,/ deciduous forest, 3-11.X./ leg. D. Fedorenko GoogleMaps 2018’. Paratype ♀ ( SIEE), same label, except for ‘…/ 22°36´50´´N 105°52´0´´E, h~ 1800 m, deciduous/ ba[m]boo forest, 3-11.X.2018 / leg. D. Fedorenko’ GoogleMaps .
DIAGNOSIS.Distinctive from the previous species chiefly in having the elytra sexually dimorphic, rather shiny in male vs. dull in female due to microsculpture being superficial and transversely meshed or granulate, respectively. Furthermore, reflexed lateral margin of elytra in apical half has a distinct blunt carina. For other differences see the key and ‘Description’ below.
DESCRIPTION. Very similar to P. matalini sp.n., except for the following differences. BL 21.2–24.2 mm. Body ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ) black, shiny in male, dull in female. Microsculpture distinct, consisting of moderately transverse meshes on pronotum and of moderately to very transverse meshes on elytra in male and of very coarse, isodiametric to barely longitudinal, meshes on elytra in female; reflexed lateral margins of elytra with microsculpture isodiametric, coarse or very coarse.
Frontal sulci shallow and shorter.AR (1.58: 0.70: 0.99, n = 2).
Pronotum broadest just in front of middle, PLw/ PL 0.45 (♂) or 0.47 (♀), sides straight in front of sharp basal angles. Basolateral sulci deeper, finely and densely punctate at bottom and on each side, with sparser punctures between inner and outer sulcus and almost reaching median line; inner sulci slightly shorter, running on basal third and almost reaching basal margin; outer sulci slightly shorter than inner ones .
Elytral basal ridge transverse and straight. Striae impunctate and very deep, more so toward apex. Intervals very convex. Parascutellar striole missing. Discal seta d3 adjoining stria 2, D3/EL 0.25–0.35 (0.28, n = 2×2). Stria 7 bisetose at apex, with intermediate, right unilateral, seta in the male. USS: 27–31.
Ventral side similar, except for sides densely and more coarsely punctate. Male abdominal sternite VII similar ( Fig. 18 View Figs 10–18 ).
Legs: ti 1 with single postero-apical spinule.
Aedeagus ( Figs 28 View Figs 19–30 , 44–45 View Figs 40–45 , 50 View Figs 46–51 ) with its everted and inflated internal sac similar except chiefly that Λ- shaped sclerite is distinctive (other differences are not described as they may have come from not maximally inflated internal sac).
DISTRIBUTION. The species is known from the type locality only.
NAME. Patronymic, given after my good friend, specialist in Carabidae, Dr. Kirill Makarov (The Moscow Pedagogical State University).
HABITATS AND HABITS. Both specimens were taken in cloudy forests.
ZMMU |
Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University |
PL |
Západoceské muzeum v Plzni |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |