Vulda cangalica, Assing, Volker, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.176738 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6244404 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D308E1E-FF81-FFB9-FF39-FAB7FCA3FE6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Vulda cangalica |
status |
sp. nov. |
Vulda cangalica View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs. 7–13 View FIGURES 7 – 12 View FIGURE 13 )
Type material. Holotype: ɗ, "Cangaldagh, Anat. bor. 16.–26.V.57, leg. F. Schubert / Xantholinus spec.? det. F. Schubert / Holotypus ɗ Vulda cangalica sp. n. det. V. Assing 2006" ( NHMW). Paratypes: 1ɗ, same data as holotype ( NHMW); 1ɗ, "Anat. b. Cangal Dagh, 7.– 15.6.60, leg. F. Schubert" ( NHMW); 1ɗ, "Cangal/ Ayancik, 5.62, Anat., leg. F. Schubert" (cAss).
Description. Measurements (in mm) and ratios (range, arithmetic mean; n=4): AL: 2.32–2.44, 2.39; HL: 1.59–1.68, 1.62; HW: 1.10–1.21, 1.16; PW: 0.95–1.01, 0.97; PL: 1.51–1.59, 1.53; EL: 0.95–1.06, 1.01; EW: 1.15–1.28, 1.22; AW: 1.10–1.25, 1.17; TiL: 0.95–1.01, 0.99; TaL: 0.77–0.83, 0.79; ML: 1.30–1.39, 1.33; TL: 8.6–9.4, 9.9; HL/HW: 1.36–1.45, 1.39; PW/HW: 0.81–0.86, 0.83; PL/PW: 1.57–1.60, 1.59; EL/PL: 0.64– 0.67, 0.66; EW/PW: 1.21–1.30, 1.26; AW/EW: 0.95–0.98, 0.96; TiL/TaL: 1.22–1.27, 1.25.
Habitus as in Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 12 . Coloration: blackish brown to black; pronotum reddish brown to castaneous; elytra yellowish to yellowish brown; abdomen reddish to dark brown, with the posterior margins of the anterior segments and the abdominal apex reddish; legs reddish to brown; antennae reddish brown to brown.
Head distinctly oblong (see measurements and ratio HL/HW); lateral margins weakly convex in dorsal view ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); eyes small ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ), not projecting from lateral outline of head, 1/7–1/5 the length of postocular region in dorsal view; dorsal surface with well-defined and moderately coarse puncturation, at most with very scattered micropunctures; microsculpture absent. Antenna with antennomere I approximately as long as the combined length of antennomeres II–V; II and III oblong and of subequal length; IV weakly transverse; V–X weakly to moderately transverse; X less than 1.5 times as wide as long.
Pronotum slender, distinctly narrower than head (see ratio PW/HW), moderately tapering posteriad; lateral margins almost straight in dorsal view; dorsal series somewhat irregular, composed of 10–13 punctures; whole surface with very sparse micropunctures, lateral areas with sparse coarse punctures; microsculpture absent ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ).
Elytra distinctly shorter and wider than pronotum (see ratios EL/PL and EW/PW); puncturation welldefined and of variable density ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ). Hind wings completely reduced. Legs moderately slender (see measurements and ratio TiL/TaL).
Abdomen approximately as wide as elytra, widest at segments VI/VII; puncturation fine, much sparser on posterior than on anterior tergites; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
ɗ: aedeagus with internal structures of distinctive shape ( Figs. 11–12 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ).
Comparative notes. The species is distinguished from all its congeners by the distinctive morphology of the aedeagus. From other species occurring in Turkey, it is additionally separated as follows: from V. o t t o m a n a by larger size; from V. brignolii by the bicoloured body, as well as by the more slender head and pronotum; and from V. vignai by distinctly smaller size and by larger eyes.
For illustrations of the habitus and genitalia of these species see Figs. 5–6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 and 14–15 View FIGURES 14 – 21 , as well as Bordoni (1973a).
Etymology. The name refers to the mountain range where the type specimens were discovered.
Distribution and bionomics. The known distribution is confined to the Çangal Daġı, Sinop province, northern Anatolia. Additional bionomic data are not available.
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |