Carex eremitica Paine
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.219.2.8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/103187FB-6A7F-B719-FF06-F96FFAAD84A3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Carex eremitica Paine |
status |
|
Carex eremitica Paine View in CoL
Carex eremitica Paine (1875: 126) View in CoL is currently an accepted species presumably distributed in the southeastern Mediterranean basin (Israel-Palestine and Jordan; Govaerts 2014, Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño 2011a). Its taxonomic circumscription and sectional placement have been obscure, and the actual taxonomic status of this species has not been revised to date. It was described in the Natural History section of the Identification of Mount Pisgah ( Paine 1875), based on materials probably collected by Paine himself in Balqa (“Belqa”) plain, today northwestern Jordan.
Paine provided a detailed description of the species, remarking its androgynous spikes congested in a broadly capitate inflorescence (“ spicis in capitulum lato-ovatum spice masculum confertis ”), which allows identifying it as a member of the subgenus Vignea (P. Beauv. ex Lestib) Petermann (1849: 602) . Among other critical characters, linear leaves, dark (“dusky”) purple glumes with hyaline margins, and utricles “almost smooth”, “rhomboidal”, and “cuspidate beaked” were specified. The species was later recorded by Post (1986) in his Flora of Syria, Palestine and Sinai, including a vague description that probably just reproduced Paine’s record, as it was reported only from Balqa. Paine considered this plant to be allied to C. praecox Schreber (1771: 63) View in CoL , a species included in section Ammoglochin Dumortier (1827: 146) . However, no species from this group is currently known from Jordan. According to checklists ( Govaerts 2014, Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño 2011a) and floristic treatments of neighboring regions ( Egorova 1999, Kukkonen 1998, Nilsson 1986), there are only two Carex species that could potentially match Paine’s description: C. stenophylla Wahlenberg (1803: 24) View in CoL (section Boernerae V. Krecz. ex Egorova (1965: 70)) or C. pachystylis J. Gay (1838: 101) View in CoL (section Physodeae Meinshausen (1901: 280 , 312)). This possibility was already considered by Feinbrun-Dothan (1986) in Flora Palaestina View in CoL , who considered C. stenophylla View in CoL to be conspecific with C. pachystylis View in CoL , and listed “? C. eremitica Paine View in CoL ” under the synonyms list.
We have requested or in situ studied materials assignable to C. eremitica Paine (including materials classified as C. stenophylla and C. pachystylis ) from all herbaria where Paine’s collections have been reported to be deposited (G, GH, K, MICH, NYS, PH; cf. Stafleu & Cowan 1976 –1988). However, all searches of C. eremitica type material were unsuccessful.
Carex pachystylis View in CoL and C. stenophylla View in CoL can be difficult to distinguish from each other when ripe fruits are not available, as the main feature that allow discriminating between them are the coriaceous utricles, not easily detachable from the spike in C. stenophylla View in CoL , while papyraceous and deciduous in C. pachystylis View in CoL ( Egorova 1999, Kukkonen 1998). Despite Paine (1875) did not give any information about this character, he provided a key clue that allows us to figure out the identity of his species: “almost smooth appressed perigynia”, a character that contrasts with the regularly serrulate beak of C. praecox Schreb. View in CoL (cf. Luceño et al. 2008), to which Paine compared its C. eremitica View in CoL . It implies that the utricle beak of C. eremitica View in CoL was not totally smooth but, at least, very sparsely scabrid. We have studied the scarce available materials of both C. stenophylla View in CoL and C. pachystylis View in CoL from Israel-Palestine and Jordan from K and E herbaria (Appendix I). In all the studied samples, C. pachystylis View in CoL displayed completely smooth utricles, whereas C. stenophylla View in CoL sometimes had utricles somewhat scabrid at apex. Both characters have been previously recorded for each species in other treatments ( Kukkonen 1998, Nilsson 1986). Thus, we conclude that Paine’s C. eremitica View in CoL is probably a heterotypic synonym of C. stenophylla View in CoL , so it should be removed from checklists as an accepted species name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Carex eremitica Paine
Jiménez-Mejías, Pedro, Rodríguez-Palacios, Giovanni E. & Martín-Bravo, Santiago 2015 |
Carex eremitica
Paine, J. A. 1875: ) |