Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3875.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66613335-DA8E-4EE7-A0A4-5FE405B15437 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5130861 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/11038800-FFCF-FFBE-FF41-309368460A75 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford) |
status |
|
54. Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford) View in CoL
Xyleborus mutilatus Blandford, 1894a: 103 View in CoL .
Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford) View in CoL : Dole & Cognato, 2010: 530.
Thai distribution: N: Chiang Mai ( Schedl 1971 as Xyleborus mutilatus View in CoL ). No later records from Thailand.
Other distribution: Throughout the Oriental region from India to Indonesia and New Guinea, extending North to China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan. Introduced to and invasive in southern U.S.A. ( Haack 2006, Rabaglia et al. 2006). (4)
Biology: The biology of the species has been studied in Japan by Kajimura and Hijii (1992, 1994), in China by Tang (2000), and in U.S.A. by Stone and colleagues (Stone & Nebeker 2007, Stone et al. 2007). The associated ambrosia fungus has been described by Six et al. (2009). It is a pest of young Castanea mollissima (Fagaceae) trees in China (Zhejiang) ( Tang 2000), but in USA appears to favour stressed host plants (Stone et al. 2007).
Illustrations: P (Hulcr 2013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford)
Beaver, R. A., Sittichaya, W. & Liu, L-Y. 2014 |
Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford)
Dole, S. A. & Cognato, A. I. 2010: 530 |
Xyleborus mutilatus
Blandford, W. F. H. 1894: 103 |